Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0125
Parcel: 13708021F

Address:
5681 S 12TH AV

Review Status: Active

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0125
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Active
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/11/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
07/11/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location and size of public water lines and fire hydrants.
b. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The locations of any gas lines, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights.
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
2. Verify that permission has been granted to connect to the existing building sewer on the adjacent property parcel. Note that if the combined sewer flow exceeds 3,000 gallons per day (based upon Table 1, Unit Daily Design Flows; Title 18, Chapter 9, Arizona Administrative Code), the resulting private sewer collection system will require review by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality.
07/12/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate location of proposed and/or existing fire hydrants. Refer to 2012 International Fire Code (section 507) for requirements.
Please indicate if fire sprinklers are to be installed.
07/16/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 24, 2013
SUBJECT: Plaza Cornidez IIa Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Arquitecto E.J. Ornelas & Associates; Attn: Eduardo Ornelas, RA
LOCATION: 5681 S 12th Ave; T15S R13E Sec01
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0125

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (JAS Engineering, 03JUL13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/UDC_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Technical_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Admin_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development plan document to provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.E: Revise the development plan document to provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e sheet 1 of 2). The total number of sheets needs to include the landscape plans.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0125) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.4: Revise the project location map to meet the minimum requirements within the referenced section; show the property approximately centered within 1 square mile and provide a brief legal description without the white out.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.3: Revise the development plan document to provide the correct rezoning conditions on the plan. The conditions listed do not match the revised rezoning conditions.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan document to provide a general note stating "This project is designed to meet the overlay zones criteria Sec.5.4, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone and Sec.5.6, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ)."

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan document to label both streets as "Public."

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the existing 25-foot radii at the driveway location on Drexel Road per the last approved Development Plan, D11-0018.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to show all improvements onsite. Per the proposed document it appears that a portion of the landscape island on the northwest corner of the lot is proposed to be constructed within the right-of-way. Provide prior TDOT approval and a right-of-way use permit will be required.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Provide a recorded copy of a cross access agreement for the proposed access points from the existing development. Since this site utilizes the adjacent parcel for access a cross access agreement is required.


11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to and Keynote #17 for the proposed vertical curbing to either provide a reference to a PC/COT Standard Detail or provide a separate detail for construction purposes.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide the minimum 3-foot radii dimension for the required back-up spur at the end of the PAAL per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.4.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. As wheel stops are proposed for the accessible vehicle parking spaces provide a wheel stop location dimension per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the Cut Fill Section to reference the new UDC Standards. Since the Development Standards no longer exists the plan needs to reference the correct UDC or TSM Standards, revise.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan document to clarify the total parcel area and the total disturbed area. DVP General Note #02 conflicts with the Lot Area Calculations under the Zoning information, revise.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document and Keynote #6 to label and dimension the proposed wall openings into the landscape areas. Provide a detail for construction purposes and verify that the openings meet all requirements of the Drainage Report.

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Verify on the development plan document that the new water harvesting areas meet the minimum size for the required detention water volume per the Drainage Report. The Report and water harvesting areas must be sized accordingly and must be clearly dimensioned for length, width and depth.

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to label all existing and proposed handicap access ramps. Offsite ramps within the right-of-way must be constructed per PC/COT Standard Detail 207 and all onsite ramps must meet the minimum ANSI requirements.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document and/or provide an associated Keynote to reference the PC/COT Standard Detail #200 for Public Improvement for all proposed concrete sidewalks, or provide a separate detail for construction purposes.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to provide a pedestrian access path from the building to all streets on which the project has frontage. Specifically provide a sidewalk from the building to the street sidewalk along Drexel Road. Verify the minimum sidewalk width in plan view.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Per the proposed development plan document it appears that some proposed construction of the vehicular use area for the landscape planters and sidewalks will take place on the adjacent property, provide written notarized approval along with a temporary construction easement for any and all work that is offsite

23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan document to provide refuse container onsite for this property. Provide a construction detail for the refuse enclosures. The detail must match TSM Sec.8-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc. The new retail stores can not use the existing dumpsters on the adjacent property unless it can be shown through refuse calculations and prior approval from Environmental Services that the existing dumpster can handle the total volume of refuse for both developments.

DRAINAGE REPORT:

24) Revise the Drainage Report to provide conformance with the required detention requirements for the site per TSM Sec.4-03. The Drainage Report must provide estimated detention storage volumes, outflow hydrographs and all other design criteria to verify that the proposed landscape areas can meet the storage volumes and drain times per the Standard.

25) Revise the Drainage Report to provide specific design criteria for the water harvesting areas. The report must provide minimum dimensions for the water harvesting areas that must match the development plan document to show that the required storage volumes can be held within these areas.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
07/17/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Plaza Cornidez IIa
Development Package (1st Review) Revised
DP13-0125

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 18, 2013

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed.

1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site.

2. Remove all references to the wholesale use group from the plan as it is not an allowed use in the C-1 Zone.

The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0. Development package review comments;

1. A.M. 2-06.4.1 Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet.

2. A.M. 2-06.4.2.C Provide a brief legal description within the title block.

3. A.M. 2-06.4.2.D Zoning acknowledges that A.M. 2-06.4.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said remove the address from the title block and provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block.

4. A.M. 2-06.4.2.E Provide the sheet number 1 of 2 and 2 of 2.

5. A.M. 2-06.4.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP13-0125.

6. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.3 The rezoning conditions listed the plan do not match the revised rezoning conditions. List the correct conditions on the plan.

7. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 Revise General Note 2 to include "SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.9.B.3 and 4.9.13.O".

8. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.6 Provide a general notes stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA SEC. 5.4, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE & Sec. 5.6, AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)."

9. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H Near the northwest corner of this property there is vertical curb shown that appears to be within the right-of-way (ROW). A ROW use permit will be required.

10. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A. Remove the reference to "U.D.C. Table 6.3-4.B" from General Note 2 as it is not applicable.

11. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H Provide the radius dimension for the back-up spur shown at the south end of the parking area.

12. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.a As "WHOLESALE" is not an allowed use in the C-1 Zone remove "WHOLESALE SPACES" from the vehicle parking space calculation and revise the calculation. Once the use is specified for the 2,000 Sq. Ft. shown under the "WHOLESALE SPACES" additional comments may be forth coming.

13. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.a Provide a typical parking space detail for standard parking spaces on the plan.

14. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.a Provide a wheel stop location dimension on the accessible and standard vehicle parking space details, see UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

15. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.c Until the "WHOLESALE" use has been revised the loading space calculation cannot be verified.

16. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Provide a short & long term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan.

17. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Review UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & .C and provide a Short-Term Bicycle parking detail that shows how these UDC sections are met.

18. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Review UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & .D and provide a Long-Term Bicycle parking detail that shows how these UDC sections are met.

19. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Details 2 & 3 sheet 1L_01 reference "CLASS II" bicycle parking & "DS 2-09". Remove the references to "CLASS II" & "DS 2-09" as they are no longer applicable.

20. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Keynote 10 references "DS 2-09". Remove the references to "DS 2-09" as it is no longer applicable.

21. A.M. 2-06.4.9.J Show and dimension the future curb and sidewalk on the plan for 12th Avenue.

22. A.M. 2-06.4.9.L Some type of easement and/or agreement will be required for access to this parcel and access to the existing dumpster enclosure. Provide copies of the recorded document that will allow this access.

23. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O As the future curb was not provided on this plan the front street perimeter yard setback cannot be verified. Per UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1 this setback is measured from the back of future curb.

24. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O As the proposed building is not meeting the required perimeter yard setback to the south property line a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required to eliminate the setback. The variance will need to approved prior to approval of this development package. Per UDC Table 6.3-4.A, C-1 Zone, Nonres Use to Res Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 1 ½ (H) times the height of the proposed exterior building wall. Based on a height of 12'-0" the required setback is 18'-0", proposed setback is 0'-0". Zoning requests building elevations so that perimeter yard setback requirements can be verified.

25. A.M. 2-06.4.9.Q Per UDC Section 5.6.11 Provide the proposed building height based on the mean sea level (MSL) elevation of the northwest end of TIA runway 11L of 2,575

26. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Provide width dimensions for the sidewalks shown along the north side of the proposed building and running from the proposed building to 12th Avenue.

27. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Per TSM section 7-01.3.3.B The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. That said as this site cannot stand alone due to access and solid waste a pedestrian circulation is required to connect to the existing building and provide access to the trash enclosure.

28. A.M. 2-06.4.9.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Add a note stating that all signage will be under a separate permit.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0125

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package.
07/30/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change The following comments pertain to:

TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL
SECTION 4: HYDROLOGY

SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING
TABLE 7.6.4-1: LANDSCAPE BORDER (SECTION 7.6.4.C) AND SCREENING STANDARDS (SECTION 7.6.5)

Applicability: All commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010.

1. A Water Harvesting Implementation Plan shall be submitted with all applications for new commercial developments where landscaping is required. The plan shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50 percent of landscape demand.

2. Provide water budget data, along with the background data and assumptions used to develop it. This water budget format is available to applicants as an Excel spreadsheet @ cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/water_budget_spreadsheet.xls

3. Applicants may use this water budget format to enter site-specific data to develop their Site Water Budget. Alternatively, applicants may develop their own Site Water Budget format. Whichever format is used, the submitted Site Water Budget shall incorporate and provide the following information:

a. Water Demand. Applicants shall use plant water demand categories and data provided in Exhibit A unless alternative assumptions are provided and satisfactorily justified.

b. Water Supply. Applicants shall use the effective monthly rainfall assumptions shown in Exhibit A unless alternative assumptions are provided and satisfactorily justified.

c Output of the Site Water Budget shall include calculations showing how 50 percent of landscape water demand as an average across the site will be met using harvested rainwater, and shall include assumptions and supporting calculations as necessary to document these outputs. Output of the Site Water Budget shall include total water demand and rainwater supply calculations for each Water Harvesting Infiltration Area at the site.

4. A 5' wall to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential zoned property must be provided per TS Table 7.6.4-1.

5. Interior Landscape Border required along site boundary of residential zoned property per TS Table 7.6.4-1. Provide one canopy tree for every 33 linear feet of landscape border.

6. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.

7. Additional comments may apply.
07/31/2013 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
07/31/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied 1. Provide detectable warnings at both ends of the marked crossing as per ICC A117.1, Section 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable.
2. Identify all accessible routes.
a. Maintain grade slopes a sper ICC A117.1, Section 403.3, 5% max running and 2% max cross slopes.
d. Dimension all accessible route widths.
3. Provide large scale details of the following showing all accessible requirements as per the 2012 IBC Chapter 12 and 2009 ICC A117.1:
a. The marked crossing showing all dimensions, ramps, slopes, markings and detectable warnings.
b. The accessible parking layout showing all dimensions, grade slopes, accessible aisles, markings, signage, sidewalk ramp, marked crossing connection and detectable warnings.
c. Accessible parking signage including a "Van Accessible" sign.
END OF REVIEW
08/07/2013 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/07/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF RECEIVED