Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0111
Parcel: 11507063A

Address:
215 W LESTER ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP13-0111
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/19/2013 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/19/2013 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Passed
06/19/2013 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Passed Per Addressing form
06/19/2013 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
06/20/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: June 28, 2013
SUBJECT: Temperature Control Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Bruce R Call, PE
LOCATION: 215 W Lester St; T14S R13E Sec01
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0111

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/UDC_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Technical_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Admin_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0111) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: Revise the development plan document to include the relevant rezoning case number (C9-09-06) in the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.3: Revise the development plan document to include the Rezoning Notes and any applicable conditions per the approved rezoning case.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan document to include all information for the existing public right of way, specifically label the curb to property line dimension.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document and Keynote #3 to correctly dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk along the street frontage per TSM.10-01.4.1.A. If a smaller sidewalk is proposed then a TSMR will be required.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to provide a Keynote call out with a reference to a PC/COT Standard Detail for the driveway entrance that is required to be closed off per the rezoning conditions. Currently the site plan calls it out as all existing curb, however per the aerial there is a secondary driveway that must be closed off with vertical curbing to match existing, revise.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the required 18-foot radii at the driveway entrance on Lester Street per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to TSM Sec.10-01 for street development standards. Provide written approval from TDOT that the proposed project does not have to meet the minimum 18-foot radii and a smaller radii or standard driveway apron can be utilized. If a standard driveway apron is proposed provide a Keynote call out for the PC/COT Standard Detail for construction purposes.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to correctly label the near side SVT. Per the Sight Matrix, TSM.10-01.5.3, the Near Side dimension for a PAAL to a Local Street is 20'x185,' revise.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide a Keynote call out for the required surface material for the proposed vehicular use area per UDC.7.4.6.I.1.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document and all applicable Keynotes to provide the correct reference to the Sheet that has the details delineated. Keynotes 6 and 7 call out a Detail of Sheet 4 however the development plan document has only 3 sheets, revise.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document and Keynote #11 to clearly label that the new water harvesting area is to be depressed a minimum 6-inches.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
06/21/2013 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Passed
06/21/2013 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved See letter in SIRE
06/21/2013 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Denied Project is not approved by Environmental Services. Need layout for waste disposal and recycle or details in the notes describing proposed services.




Jeff Drumm, P.E.
Environmental Manager
City of Tucson Environmental Services
520-837-3713
06/25/2013 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) has no comments regarding the CDRC Development Plan DP13-0111/Temperature Control.

We appreciate the opportunity to review the Development Plan/Site Plan for Temperature Control at 215 W. Lester Street, Tucson AZ 85705.

Maria Deal
Transportation Engineering Specialist
Southern Regional Traffic Engineering
ADOT
1221 S. 2nd Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85713
520.388.4235
mdeal@azdot.gov
06/27/2013 KBROUIL1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
07/01/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location and size of public water lines, and fire hydrants.
b. The location and size of sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The point of connection to the existing public sewer.
d. Any existing or proposed utility easements
e. The first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
07/03/2013 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702

WR#265506 June 3, 2013

Bruce Call
4572 E Camp Lowell Dr
Tucson, Arizona 85712

Dear Mr. Call

SUBJECT: Temperature Control
DP13-0111

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 19, 2013. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244.

Sincerely,


Elizabeth Miranda
Office Support Specialist
Design/Build
lm
Enclosures
cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email)
M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power
07/05/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Temperature Control
Development Package (1st Review)
DP13-0111

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 5, 2013

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed.

1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site.

2. Remove all references to the Land Use Code (LUC) from the plan and provide the applicable references to the Unified Development Code (UDC) on the plan.

3. Remove all references to Development Standards (DS) and provide the applicable references to the, Administrative Manual (AM) or Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0. Development package review comments;

1. A.M. 2-06.4.2.D Zoning acknowledges that A.M. 2-06.4.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block.

2. A.M. 2-06.4.2.E The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e sheet 1 of 1).

3. A.M. 2-06.4.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP13-0111.

4. A.M. 2-06.4.4.C The section shown in the southwest section is not correct and should be listed as "11".

5. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.1 & .3 Revise "GENERAL NOTE 1" to read "EXSITNG ZONING IS C-1, PROPOSED ZONING IS C-2."

6. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.1 & .3 List under a separate heading the rezoning conditions on the plan.

7. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 Remove the reference to "DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATOR 30" from GENERAL NOTE 2 as it is not longer applicable.

8. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b Remove the reference to "FLOOR AREA RATIO" from GENERAL NOTE 3 as it is not longer applicable.

9. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b Under "SITE SUMMARY DATA" remove the reference to lot coverage as it is not applicable.

10. A.M. 2-06.4.8.A Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet. That said provide the complete bearings and as this parcel is a combination of several parcels the north and south distance should be a single distance.

11. A.M. 2-06.4.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. That said provide the zoning for the parcels to the north of Lester Street..

12. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.a Key Note 6 & 7 reference sheet 4, no sheet 4 found.

13. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.a The wheel stop location dimension is not correct, see UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

14. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.a The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Under "**" there is a reference to "2,456/250". Per UDC Table 7.4.4-1, COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Construction Service 1 space per 300 sq. ft. GFA is required. Based on 2,456/300 = 8 required.

15. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.a Under "PROJECT SUMMARY DATA", "**" there is a reference to "PROTECTIVE SERVICE" clarify what this is.

16. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.c Under "PROJECT SUMMARY DATA" The loading zones calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.5.5-A COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP no loading space is required.

17. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC 7.4.8-1 COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Construction Service, two (2) Short-Term spaces are required.

18. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Show the location of the required Short-Term bicycle parking on the plan.

19. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Review UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & .C and provide a Short-Term Bicycle parking detail that shows how these UDC sections are met.

20. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Per TSM 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a sidewalk along the west side of the existing office building.

21. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R TSM 7-01.3.3.B Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required as follows: The areas within the development which must be connected include, all buildings. Exceptions: Portions of certain Land Use Classes which by their nature will not be used for public pedestrian access, such as industrial uses, commercial storage uses, wholesale uses, contractor yards, or similar uses, are not
22. required to have sidewalks constructed in conformance with this Standard, provided adequate pedestrian refuge areas are provided. That said provide a striped pedestrian refuge from the office building to the show/storage building and dumpster area.

23. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Per TSM 7-01.4.1.A At least one (1) sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. That said provide a sidewalk from the buildings to the street sidewalk.

24. A.M. 2-06.4.9.U Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0111

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package.
07/08/2013 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied SHEET 1
1. Provide an accessible route and a man gate through the security fence and connect the accessible entrance of the building to the Lester Street pedestrian way.
2. Provide an accessible route (marked crossing) from the accessible parking space to the accessible entrance of the building.
3. The one accessible parking space provided is to be "Van Accessible" with an 8' wide aisle or an 11' wide parking space and a 5' wide aisle.
4. The note 7 reference to detail 1/4 is invalid as there is no sheet 4. Please change the reference to 1/2.
SHEET 2
5. At detail 1:
a. Indicate a 2% maximum grade slope in all directions for the accessible parking space and aisle.
b. Reference the above comment 4 to change the accessible parking space to a "Van Accessible " parking space.
6. At detail 2:
a. The note indicating a wall mounted sign is not valid.
b. Provide a "Van Accessible" sign just below trhe main sign.
END OF REVIEW
07/11/2013 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT Approved I have no issues with this request.

CSO Becky Noel #37968
Tucson Police Dept
837-7428
07/16/2013 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Approv-Cond See letter in SIRE
07/16/2013 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Zelin Canchola
TDOT Traffic Engineering

PROJECT: Temperature Control
Development Package DP13-0111

From Jason Green comments concerning curb return radius:

"7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the required
18-foot radii at the driveway entrance on Lester Street per City of Tucson Transportation
Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to TSM Sec.10-01 for street
development standards. Provide written approval from TDOT that the proposed project
does not have to meet the minimum 18-foot radii and a smaller radii or standard driveway
apron can be utilized. If a standard driveway apron is proposed provide a Keynote
call out for the PC/COT Standard Detail for construction purposes"

Given proposed ADT (average daily traffic), and existing conditions a curb return is not required.

Revise the development plan document to correctly label the
near side SVT. Per the Sight Matrix, TSM.10-01.5.3, the Near Side dimension for a
PAAL to a Local Street is 20'x185,' revise.

Provide note to indicate existing curb opening will be modified and replaced wih vertical curb.

All work within the right of way will require a permit from Permits and Codes TDOT Engineering. Call 791 5100 for additional information.
07/17/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site DS 7.6.2. APPLICABILITY


2. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress DS 7.6.4.C.2.a. Portion of street landscape border does not indicate required coverage.

3. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per

4. A 30" screen is required is screen vehicle use are from Lester St. DS LANDSCAPE BORDER TABLE 7.6.4-1:

5. Note: The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements.

6. Except as otherwise provided by this section, the area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, must be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite DS DS 7.6.4.C.2.d.


7. Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per DS 7.6.4.B.1.a

8. An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each DS 7.6.4.B.1.a.3. Indicate planter area for trees within the parking area.

9. All landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting.

10. Note: The Irrigation Plan is labeled Temperature Plan. Revise as necessary

11. All plans within the development package must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between plans. Ensure that all changes made to other documents are reflected on the landscape plan.

12. Additional comments may apply.
07/17/2013 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved No objections/adverse comments



____________________________

Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP

Senior Land-Use Modeler



PAG40MPOhoriz3.png



177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 792-1093 x506 (tel)

(520) 620-6981 (fax)

www.pagnet.org

<mailto:ekramer@pagnet.org> ekramer@pagnet.org
07/18/2013 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied This review has been completed and resubmittal is required.

Please include:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) a disk containing all items submitted for review
3) all items needed to approved the plans
4) all items requested by review staff.
07/18/2013 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)


FROM: Susan King
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor's Office


DATE:


RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
DP13-0111 Temperature Control


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.

COMMENTS:

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.

Thank you,

Susan King
07/18/2013 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES CENTURYLINK Passed
07/18/2013 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed
07/18/2013 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Passed
07/18/2013 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Passed
07/18/2013 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
07/18/2013 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/02/2013 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
10/02/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed