Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP13-0098
Parcel: 13313005F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0098
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/30/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
06/03/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/11/2013 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP13-0098
7525 E. Speedway Blvd
Development Package

TRANSMITTAL: 06/21/2013

DUE DATE: 06/26/2013

COMMENTS:
1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is 05/28/2014.

2. As of January 2, 2013 The City of Tucson adopted the Unified Development Code (UDC) with the Administrative Manual (AM) and the Technical Standards replacing the LUC and Development Standards. Revise this plan to reflect the changes in the codes. See AM 2-06 for content required.

3. AM 2-06.4.3 In the relevant case numbers the correct previous development plan number indicated as D09-00118 should be D09-0018. Provide case number T12CM01532 (for carport covers) and the assigned case number DP13-0098 near the lower right corner of all sheets.

Provide the location of the previously approved carports on the plan.

4. AM 2-06.4.7.A.4 In the permitting note number 3 revise the subject to sections as follows: subject to: 4.9.3.D and 4.9.13.K

5. AM 2-06.4.7.A.8.b Floor Area Ratios are not required per the UDC. Remove from plans.

UDC does not have a development designator nor perimeter yard indicator (See UDC Table 6.3-3.A for setbacks), Remove from plans.

6. AM 2-06.4.9.H.5 Dimension the width of the PAAL behind the western most handicap parking spaces. Minimum 24'.

7. AM 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Remove the LUC reference from the parking calculations on sheet 1 of 9.

Provide a dimension for the wheel stop locations. Minimum of 2'-6" from the front of the parking space.

8. AM 2-06.4.9.H.5.c Per UDC Table 7.5.5-A the number of required loading zones is zero (0). Revise the number of required loading zones and remove the LUC references.

9. AM 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 the required number of short term bicycle parking spaces is 1 space per 20 students. Revise and rename the indicated number of required (class 2 spaces) to the correct number and name (short term bicycle parking spaces) Remove the LUC references.

The number of required long term bicycle parking spaces will not apply as there is no change in the number of students or the number of employees from the last approved development plan.

10. AM 2-06.4.9.Q Provide on the foot print of the building on 6 of 9 the overall dimensions of the addition as well as the height of the proposed addition.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961
06/14/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Approved
06/19/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location and size of water lines, water meters, and fire hydrants.
b. The location and size of public sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The location and size of private sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts.
d. The proposed point of connection to existing private or public sewers.
e. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights.
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
2. A private sewer appears to be located beneath the existing multi-use building (building # 1); of what material is it constructed?
06/25/2013 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
06/26/2013 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved
06/26/2013 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
06/26/2013 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Add plant names and sizes. Show irrigation connection and lines.

Clarify if tree is being maintained at the west end of the parking row.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/01/2013 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
07/01/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed