Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0083
Parcel: 13316003C

Address:
6675 E GRANT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0083
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/02/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/02/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
07/02/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The invert and rim elevations of the downstream manhole and the upstream cleanout; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference numbers.
b. The proposed point of connection to the existing public sewer.
c. The first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
07/05/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: July 16, 2013
SUBJECT: Chick-Fil-A Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Bob Hatch
LOCATION: 6675 E Grant Road; T14S R15E Sec06
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0083

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Report (Zell Company, LLC, 01JUL13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/UDC_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Technical_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Admin_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN: Due to the full code expansion requirement per the Zoning Section make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within the UDC, AM and TSM and are reflected on the site plan sheets.

1) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development plan document to provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.E: Revise the development plan document to provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e sheet 1 of 8, 2 of 8 etc). The total number of sheets needs to include the landscape plans.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0083) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.4: Revise the project location map to meet the minimum requirements within the referenced section; show the property approximately centered within 1 square mile, label sections, township and ranges, section corners, north arrow and scale (3"=1 mile).

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.5: Revise the development plan document to provide a sheet index that includes all sheets of the development package on the cover sheet.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan document to provide a general note stating "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria Sec.5.4, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone."

7) DS Sec.2-06.4.7.B.1: Revise the development plan document to include a Drainage Note per the referenced standard specifically; "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall."

8) DS Sec.2-06.4.7.B.3: Revise the development plan document to include a Drainage Note per the referenced standard specifically; "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan."

9) DS Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development plan document to include a General Note per the referenced section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

10) DS Sec.2-06.4.7.D: Revise the development plan document to include a General Note per the referenced section; "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Revise the development plan document to provide the recordation information (Book and Page or SEQ#) for the 25' INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITY ESMT as shown along the north side of the property. Clarify what "12-1230404" is and provide the recordation information on the plan.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan document to dimension the existing width of right-of-way, paving, curbs and sidewalks for both streets adjacent to the site. Label both streets as "Public" and "MS&R."

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan document to label the existing drainage infrastructure located within the public right-of-way of Tanque Verde Road, include the infrastructure improvement plan number in plan view.

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the required 25-foot radii at both driveway location on Grant Road and Tanque Verde Road (MS&R Streets) per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to TSM Sec.10-01 for street development standards. If the existing standard driveway entrances are proposed written approval from TDOT will be required.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label all existing driveway entrances that are to be closed off. All entrance must be clearly labeled and provide a Keynote to label the curbing and sidewalk dimensions along with a reference to the Standard Detail for Public Improvements to match existing.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to correctly dimension the SVT's for both driveway entrances. The near side SVT should be dimensioned at 20'x345' and the far side dimension for a roadway with a median is 20'x30', revise.

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.4: Revise the development plan document to dimension the sidewalk width for the new portion of sidewalk within the right-of-way at all closed curb cut locations.

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide a Keynote call out or construction detail for the new surface material for the proposed vehicular use area per UDC.7.4.6.I.1.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide a Keynote call out for the proposed 6-inch curbing. Either provide a reference to a PC/COT Standard Detail or provide a separate detail for construction purposes.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. As wheel stops are proposed for the accessible vehicle parking spaces provide a wheel stop location dimension per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Per the proposed development plan document it appears that some proposed grading and construction of the vehicular use area for the landscape planters will take place on the adjacent property, provide written notarized approval along with a temporary construction easement for any and all work that is offsite.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Provide the cut and fill quantities in the General Note Section to verify if a grading plan and permit will be required.

23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan document to clarify the total parcel area and the total disturbed area to verify if a grading/SWPPP plan and permit will be required.

24) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension the proposed curb cuts into the landscape areas. Provide a detail for construction purposes.

25) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document to clearly label that the new water harvesting areas are to be depressed a minimum 6-inches

26) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

27) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to label all existing and proposed handicap access ramps. Offsite ramps within the right-of-way must be constructed per PC/COT Standard Detail 207 and all onsite ramps must meet the minimum ANSI requirements.

28) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document and/or provide an associated Keynote to reference the PC/COT Standard Detail #200 for Public Improvement for all proposed concrete sidewalks, or provide a separate detail for construction purposes.

29) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to provide a pedestrian access path from the building to all streets on which the project has frontage. Specifically provide a sidewalk from the building to the street sidewalk along Tanque Verde Road.

30) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan document to provide a construction detail for the refuse enclosures. The detail must match TSM Sec.8-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc.

DRAINAGE REPORT:

31) Revise the Drainage Report Section 1.2.4 to correctly label the Pantano Wash and Chick-Fil-A store. Currently the section references the Santa Cruz River and a McDonalds, revise.
32) Revise the Drainage Report Section 1.2.4 to provide the correct FEMA FIRM Panel. The discussion states the correct panel (04019C2301L); however the figure provided is for FIRM Panel 04019C2270L, revise.

33) Revise the Drainage Report to either provide the Appendix as referenced on Page 7 or remove this page if there are no Appendices attached to the report.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
07/12/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Chick Fil A @ Tanque Verde & Grant.
Development Package (1st Review)
DP13-0083

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 12, 2013

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed.

1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site.

The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0. Development package review comments;

1. A.M. 2-06.4.1 Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet.

2. A.M. 2-06.4.2.D Zoning acknowledges that A.M. 2-06.4.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block.

3. A.M. 2-06.4.2.E The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e sheet 1 of 8, 2 of 8 etc). The total number of sheets includes landscape plans.

4. A.M. 2-06.4.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP13-0083.

5. A.M. 2-06.4.4 The location map will be drawn at 3" = 1 mile scale.

6. A.M. 2-06.4.4.C Provide the section, township, and range & label the section corners on the location map.

7. A.M. 2-06.4.5 Provide a sheet index that includes all sheets of the development package on the cover sheet.

8. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 Provide a general not that identifies the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. That said the existing use should be listed as "VEHICLE RENTAL AND SALES SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.9.G.1& .2" and the proposed use should be listed as "FOOD SERVICE SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.4.M.1 AND 4.9.13.P"

9. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.6 Provide a general notes stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA SEC. 5.4, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE

10. A.M. 2-06.4.8.B There is a "25' INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITY ESMT." Shown along the north side of the property. Clarify what "12-1230404" is and provide the recordation information on the plat.

11. A.M. 2-06.4.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

12. A.M. 2-06.4.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. That said provide the zoning for the parcels to the west of Grant Road and south of Tanque Verde Road.

13. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. As wheel stops are proposed for the accessible vehicle parking spaces provide a wheel stop location dimension per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

14. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

15. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Show the required long term bicycle parking location on the site plan.

16. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.d Provide fully dimensioned details for both short & long term bicycle parking.

17. A.M. 2-06.4.9.L As it appears that some proposed work will take place on adjacent property some type of construction easement may be required, see Engineering comments.

18. A.M. 2-06.4.9.Q Provide the height of the proposed building within the footprint on the site plan.

19. A.M. 2-06.4.9.Q There is a storage area adjacent to the proposed refuse enclosure. Clarify if this is an enclosed structure, has a roof, and what type of storage area. Depending on the type of structure and use the square footage may count toward the gross floor area used when calculating vehicle and bicycle parking requirements.

20. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Per TSM 7-01.4.1.A At least one (1) sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. That said provide a sidewalk from the buildings to the street sidewalk along Tanque Verde Road.

21. A.M. 2-06.4.9.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0111

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package.
07/18/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied 1. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout showing all accessible requirements including dimensions, van accessible space, asile, access to accessible route, markings, signage and grade slopes.
a. Provide a large scale accessible signage detail.
2. Provide detecatble warning strips for the most westerly marked crossing as per 2009 ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable.
3. Show compliance with Section 403.3 for all accessible routes to have a maximum running slope of 5% and a maximum cross slope of 2%.
4. Zoning will require a pedestrian access to the Tanque Verde pedestrian way. Reference Zoning comments. This access must meet all accessible route requirements.
5. All ramps are to comply with 2009 ICC A117.1, Sections 405 and/or 406 as applicable. Provide a separate large scale detail of all sidewalk ramps showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, slope, width, detectable warnings and etc.
END OF REVIEW
07/29/2013 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied From Zelin Canchola
TDOT Traffic Engineering

RE: DP13-0083 Chic-Fil-A

A resubmittal is requested:

Dimension proposed driveways. (TDOT will accept the porposed existing driveways with out adding 25 foot curb return radius).

Dimension Right of way

Dimension Sigh Visibility Traingles correctly.

Call out existing curb cuts that will be replaced with curb.

If you have any questions or need confirmation that a PIA or a right of way permit is required, please contact 791-5100 or go to 201 N. Stone Ave., 4th Floor, COT-DOT/Engineering/ Permits & Codes Section. Right of way permits are usually required for Curb cuts and driveways.

Permits and codes will provide a Courtesy Review.
07/30/2013 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved
07/30/2013 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Revise the plans as necessary to incorporate revisions requested by other agencies.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/09/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed