Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP13-0077
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/15/2013 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/15/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | see letter in SIRE |
| 05/15/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | |
| 05/15/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | This project is approved for City of Tucson for Residential solid waste and recycle collection services. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 05/15/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/15/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | MICHELENE NOWAK ADDRESSING REVIEW-Development Services PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP13-0077/HACIENDAS AT WRIGHTSTOWN II LOTS 13-25 DATE: MAY 15, 2013 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Label Project #DP13-0077 on plat 2. Remove Tax Parcel #’s on Lots 17 & 18 (parcel numbers are already shown below title block area) 3. Label “Ohana Place” as a Public Street 4. Include Note: Access to this subdivision will be thru Haciendas At Wrightstown Lots 1-13 (S13-007) 5. Label area north of Lot 13 –is this common area? 6. Label Natural Area west of Lots 20 & 21-is this common area? |
| 05/15/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in Sire |
| 05/17/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Here are my comments - DATE: 5/17/2013 CASE: DP13-0077 THE HACIENDAS AT WRIGHTSTOWN II COMMENT: No objections or adverse comments Daily PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation: 124 13 Thanks, -Eric Additional notes: |
| 05/20/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ada Griffin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: 05/20/13 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding DP13-0077 TENTATIVE PLAT FOR HACIENDAS AT WRIGHTSTOWN II * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: THERE MUST BE BEARINGS AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES ALL STREETS MUST HAVE DIMENTIONS, BEARINGS AND CURVE DATA OWNERSHIP MISSING FROM PLAT NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 05/24/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/28/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The rezoning must be approved before the development package can be approved. The rezoning conditions must be included in the development package. Additional comments and requirements may be imposed through the rezoning process. 2. General note 4 indicates the project is designed in conformance with the UDC. Revise note 24 to reference the correct "Technical Standard." 3. Changes shown to phase I are not approved by approval of this plat. Changes to phase I will require revision of the plans and documents for phase I. 4. Provide sufficient existing spot elevations or label the existing contours more fully to demonstrate the differential grading standard is being met. |
| 05/31/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Hacienda at Wrightstown II Development Package/Rezoning (1st Review) DP13-0077 & C9-13-02 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 31 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 06, 2014. 2. Provide copies of the approved tentative plat (DP12-0141) and final plat (S13-007) for Hacienda at Wrightstown I 3. It appears that there are changes being made to Hacienda at Wrightstown I. These changes may require a revision to approved tentative plat (DP12-0141) and final plat (S13-007). Contact Patricia Gehlen, phone 520-837-4919 or email Patricia.Gehlen@tucsonaz.gov. The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0. Development package review comments; 4. A.M. 2-06.3.9 The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. That said orient the drawings with north to the left. 5. A.M. 2-06.4.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP13-0077, C9-13-02, DP12-0141 & C9-12-11 6. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.3 Once available list the rezoning conditions on the plan. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 7. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per 8. the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. That said revise General Note 3 to include the proposed use of " SINGLE FAMILY, DETACHED, SUBJECT TO: USE SPECIFIC STANDARD 4.9.7.B.5 - 9". 9. A.M. 2-06.4.8.C It appears that the right-of-way width for Brown Avenue shown on the plan is not correct. At the location of the "30' R.O.W." dimension should this not be 10' wider due to the dedication required by the previous rezoning. 10. A.M. 2-06.4.9.G There is a reference to "PHASE I" on the plan. If phasing is proposed provide all applicable phasing calculations on the plan. 11. A.M. 2-06.4.9.U Once the rezoning conditions are available indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 12. A.M. 2-06.4.9.V For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If proposed show the location of the mailbox on the plan. 13. A.M. 2-06.4.9.V There is a "CLUSTER MAIL BOX UNIT" called out under Keynote 15, located at the eastern most end of "COMMON AREA "A"". Clarify who this mail box unit serves. If this unit is not for the proposed subdivision home owners either an access easement is required or some type of access provisions will be needed in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) 14. Provide a copy of the proposed CC&Rs with you next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0077 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & copy of the proposed CC&Rs. |
| 05/31/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Hacienda at Wrightstown II Development Package/Rezoning (1st Review) DP13-0077 & C9-13-02 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 31 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 06, 2014. 2. Provide copies of the approved tentative plat (DP12-0141) and final plat (S13-007) for Hacienda at Wrightstown I 3. It appears that there are changes being made to Hacienda at Wrightstown I. These changes may require a revision to approved tentative plat (DP12-0141) and final plat (S13-007). Contact Patricia Gehlen, phone 520-837-4919 or email Patricia.Gehlen@tucsonaz.gov. The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0. Development package review comments; 4. A.M. 2-06.3.9 The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. That said orient the drawings with north to the left. 5. A.M. 2-06.4.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP13-0077, C9-13-02, DP12-0141 & C9-12-11 6. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.3 Once available list the rezoning conditions on the plan. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 7. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per 8. the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. That said revise General Note 3 to include the proposed use of " SINGLE FAMILY, DETACHED, SUBJECT TO: USE SPECIFIC STANDARD 4.9.7.B.5 - 9". 9. A.M. 2-06.4.8.C It appears that the right-of-way width for Brown Avenue shown on the plan is not correct. At the location of the "30' R.O.W." dimension should this not be 10' wider due to the dedication required by the previous rezoning. 10. A.M. 2-06.4.9.G There is a reference to "PHASE I" on the plan. If phasing is proposed provide all applicable phasing calculations on the plan. 11. A.M. 2-06.4.9.U Once the rezoning conditions are available indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 12. A.M. 2-06.4.9.V For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If proposed show the location of the mailbox on the plan. 13. A.M. 2-06.4.9.V There is a "CLUSTER MAIL BOX UNIT" called out under Keynote 15, located at the eastern most end of "COMMON AREA "A"". Clarify who this mail box unit serves. If this unit is not for the proposed subdivision home owners either an access easement is required or some type of access provisions will be needed in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) 14. Provide a copy of the proposed CC&Rs with you next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0077 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & copy of the proposed CC&Rs. |
| 06/03/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Zelin Canchola TDOTTraffic Engineering PROJECT: The Hacienda at Wrightstown II Development Package/Rezoning (1st Review) DP13-0077 & C9-13-02 1. A left turn lane will be required on Wrightstown with proper storage and taper length to entrance of phase one Haciendas. Demonstrate offsite improvements entering phase one on next submittal. 2. ADD NOTE: A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact Permits and Codes for additional PIA information at 791-5100. 3. Ensure that the dimensions for the 'CUL-DE-SAC' are per the city's Development Standards 3-01 Figure 21. No parking within cul de sac. 4. Ensure that the dimensions for the 'CURB KNUCKLE DESIGN' are per the city's Development Standards 3-01 Figure 22. 5. ADD NOTE: Erection of all traffic control and street name signs is the responsibility of the developer. Maintenance of all traffic control and street name signs is the responsibility of the property owners' association. |
| 06/03/2013 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Insure Compliance with the Inclusive Home Design Ordinance, City of Tucson Ordinance No. 10463I. Provide a new general note referencing to that effect. 2. For reference only, do not add these notes to drawing THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING: a. As per Section 1003.2, Provide at least one accessible entrance on an accessible route from public…areas. b. Reference Section 103.1, Wavier of Provisions in this Standard. END OF COMMENTS |
| 06/04/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. For lot 20, the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (#4, 83.44') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (84.2'). Provide a backwater valve (BWV) per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Correct the manhole numbers on sheet C3; there are three manholes labeled as SMH #3. |
| 06/04/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP13-0077 Haciendas at Wrightstown II - Brown Avenue (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-13-02 Mahalo Properties - Brown Avenue NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan and Wrightstown Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: June 5, 2013 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 06/05/13 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section DP13 0077 - Mahalo Properties - Brown Avenue June 05, 2013 Based on the applicant's request; a concurrent review is under way for both Development Plan 13-0077, a residential project and Rezoning Case C9-13-02, a request to change the land use zone from RX-1 to R-1, to allow Haciendas at Wrightstown to add 13 lots (phase II) to expand the subdivision. Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan DP13-0077; rezoning case C9-13-02 must be approved by Mayor and Council. Development plan DP13-0077 shall be required to be in full compliance with all of C9-13-02 rezoning conditions. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with rezoning case C9-13-02, as approved by Mayor and Council. 2. Prior to development plan approval, add to the general notes all rezoning conditions, verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council. |
| 06/05/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: Haciendas at Wrightstown II - Tentative PLAT DP13-0077 Tucson Electric Power (TEP) has reviewed the Tentative Plat submitted May 9, 2013. TEP is unable to approve the plat at this time. TEP requests the following items be added to the plat: Show 10' TEP easement in Docket 77 at Page 303 located at south end of subdivision Show surveyed location of TEP poles at south end of subdivision Show 10' TEP easement in the southern portion of Phase I that was granted by plat for Haciendas at Wrightstown Label Common Area on west side of subdivision If you have any questions, please contact me at 917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQW603 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 06/05/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 06/05/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) All tentative plats, site plans, plot plans or other plans providing for approval of development within property that includes any regulated area as defined in Section 4-02.2.2. shall identify and delineate the regulated areas and the protected riparian area on the property and shall comply with this standard. The boundary of the regulated area and the protected riparian area should be clearly depicted on applicable submittal documents. TSM 4-02.2.4 2) For projects where there will be no encroachment within the regulated areas, development is not restricted …except that the regulated areas shall be identified on the site plan, plat or development plan in a surveyable manner. This plan, or a separate plan, shall also indicate the proposed location of the temporary fencing which is required to protect the protected riparian areas during construction. TSM 4-02.2.5.A 3) Revise Note 5 on sheet N1 to reference PDSD rather than the Parks and Recreation Department. UDC 7.7.5.C.5. 4) Revise the plans as necessary to comply with all conditions of rezoning. C9-13-02 5) Revise sheet C1 to use current code references from the UDC and TSM. 6) Revise the native plant preservation plans (and landscape) to show the limits of grading. AM 2-11.4.4.A.1 |
| 06/06/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 06/06/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 06/06/2013 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | |
| 06/06/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 06/06/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/06/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed. Resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two copies of the rolled plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan. |
| 06/06/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 06/06/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/15/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |