Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP13-0076
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/09/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/09/2013 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/22/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: May 22, 2013 SUBJECT: Coronado Apartments Patio Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: John Mackey LOCATION: 402 E 9th St; T14S R13E Sec12 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP13-0076 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division recommends conditional approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. The following item needs to be addressed: SITE PLAN: " Engineering will approve the Development Plan Package once the Temporary Revocable Easement is approved through COT Real Estate and Transportation Department. Provide the Sequence # on the development plan document. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comment provided above. For expedite purposes the development plan package can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. Please call to schedule an appointment when ready. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 05/23/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 402 E. Ninth - Patio Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP13-0076 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 29, 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed. 1. As the prior coffee shop was an accessory use to the Travelers Accommodation, Lodging, and the existing use is now, Multi-Family Apartments, the proposed food service is a separate use requiring a separate certificate of occupancy. That said the proposed patio expansion is a greater that 25% expansion of use area therefore requiring full code compliance. 2. Provide copies of the last approved site/building plans that show the restaurant area. If a last approved site plan is not available than this plan needs to show the entire site. The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0. Development package review comments; 3. A.M. 2-06.4.2.E The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e 1 of 1). 4. A.M. 2-06.4.4 Provide a project-location map that meets the requirements of this section 5. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per 6. the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The proposed use should be listed as food service. 7. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a As a general note provide the floor area for the existing café on the plan. 8. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. 9. A.M. 2-06.4.8 Unless a copy of the last approved site plan can be provided this plan needs to show the entire site. 10. A.M. 2-06.4.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way 11. adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Provide this information for both Water & Spring Street 12. A.M. 2-06.4.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 13. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.4 Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 14. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Provide a vehicle parking space calculation for the entire site, see note 2 above. 15. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Provide a Short and Long term bicycle parking space calculation for the entire site, see note 2 above. 16. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Show the location of the required Short & Long Term bicycle parking on the plan. 17. A.M. 2-06.4.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 18. Following discussions with staff it has been determined that if any of the exceptions listed under UDC Section 5.12.4.C are used a Modification of Development Requirements (MDR) must be applied for and approved prior to approval of this development package. If the MDR is approved provide the MDR number, date of approval, and if applicable any conditions of approval on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0076 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/30/2013 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Need to have building permit for fence construction, egress and emergency exiting. Entrance to new restaurant needs to be detrermined and shown |
| 05/31/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Modification of Development Requirements (MDR) must be applied for and approved to continue review UDC 5.12.4.C. Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the MDR case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 2. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape approval. 3. Additional comments may apply |
| 05/31/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/31/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/04/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |