Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0072
Parcel: 10123512A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP13-0072
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/12/2013 CPIERCE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/12/2013 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES CENTURYLINK Approved 1st review comments are informational.
08/12/2013 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved Ist review comments are informational in nature.
08/29/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied For proposed buildings (1) and (2), the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12" below the first floor elevation. Indicate that a backwater valve will be required for each building sewer per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. [Initial comment: Revise the site drawing to include the points of connection to existing public sewers. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]
08/30/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Marana Marketplace Phase III
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP13-0072


TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 03, 2013

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed.

This review includes the development package and scenic corridor review.

1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site.

The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0.
Development package review comments;

2. This comment has not been addressed. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5 & 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Provide a copy of the recorded cross access and parking agreement for this proposed site and for access to Marana Marketplace Phase II.

3. Based on UDC Section 11.4.6 Enclosed & Enclosure - "A structure that confines an area. The term "enclosed building" means a building enclosed with solid walls from floor to ceiling. Any wall penetrations, such as doors and windows, must include door or window fixtures that can solidly enclose the entire opening." the proposed wall does not meet the enclosed definition. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c It does not appear that the proposed loading spaces meet the requirements of Rezoning condition #3

4. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c The proposed loading area shown at the southeast corner of Building 3 does not meet the requirements of Rezoning condition 3. See the definition of enclosed provided above.

5. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d The provided bicycle parking space calculation requires corrections.
Per UDC Section 7.4.3.G Fractional Amounts When the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half is adjusted to the next lower whole number. That said remove all decimals from the Short and Long term bicycle parking calculations.
Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 Retail Trade Use Group the required number of Short Term bicycle parking spaces required for a Retail Trade Use 50,000 sq. ft. GFA to 99,999 sq. ft. GFA is based on 1 space per 6,000 sq. ft. GFA not per 5,000 as shown for the 64,912 sq. ft. building.
Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 Retail Trade Use Group the required number of Long Term bicycle parking spaces required for a Retail Trade Less Than 50,000 sq. ft. GFA is based on 1 space per 12,000 sq. ft. GFA Minimum requirement is 2 spaces not 1 as shown for the 15,514 sq. ft. building.

6. The 2' x 6' space is not shown correctly. The 2' x 6' space is for each bicycle on each side of the rack. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.f show the required 2'x6' parking space on detail G sheet 7.

7. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O It does not appear that the 100' perimeter yard setback is provided from the southeast corner of Building 2 to the south property line.

8. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O It does not appear that the 100' perimeter yard setback is provided from the southeast corner of Building 3 to the south property line.

9. This comment was not completely addressed. Provide a pedestrian circulation from the internal pedestrian sidewalk system to the center driveway access point. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Per rezoning conditions 23 provide the required pedestrian circulation from the internal pedestrian sidewalk system to the external pedestrian sidewalk at the two southern driveway access points.

10. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Per TSM 7-01.4.1.B The required pedestrian circulation, sidewalk, shown along the east side of Building 3 does not connect to any required pedestrian circulation. Demonstrate on the plan how a continuous pedestrian circulation is maintained. See TSM 7-01.3.3.

11. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Provide a sidewalk width dimension for the sidewalk that runs from the southwest corner of Building 1 to the sidewalk within the ROW along River Road.

12. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Demonstrate on the plan that the minimum sidewalk width of four (4) feet is maintained along the southwest side of Building 1 where the wheel stops are shown.

13. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. That said provide a minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk along the south side of Building 3 where the vehicle parking spaces are provide.

14. A.M. 2-06.4.9.T Per Rezoning condition # 3 all Dumpsters shall be within an enclosed facility. Per UDC Section 11.4.6 Enclosed & Enclosure - "A structure that confines an area. The term "enclosed building" means a building enclosed with solid walls from floor to ceiling. Any wall penetrations, such as doors and windows, must include door or window fixtures that can solidly enclose the entire opening.". That said the proposed trash enclosures do not meet this requirement.

15. This comment has not been addressed. A.M. 2-06.4.9.U Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Provide building elevations and wall details.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0072

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & cross access & parking agreements.
09/05/2013 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied ALL RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS ARE PRESENTED IN ALL CAPS

SHEET 1
1. At note 15, please state full compliance for all accessible requirements as per the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and 2009 Edition, ICC A117.1.
AT THE NEW NOTE 14 DELETE "ADA" AND REPLACE WITH "ACCESSIBLE".

SHEET 3
2. Insure all existing marked crossings at the two drive entrances have detectable warnings as per 2009 ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable.
NON-RESPONSIVE TO ADDRESSING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE EXISTING MARKED CROSSINGS AT THE MOST EASTERLY DRIVE ENTRANCE WHERE TWO NEW ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ARE CONNECTED. PLEASE CONFIRM AND PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF CONNECTION AND DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS, EXISTING OR TO BE INSTALLED.

3. Provide an accessible route connection from building 3 to the public right of way and buildings 1 and 2.
OK

4. Reference all the different accessible parking layouts to their respective details shown on sheet 7.
OK

5. Provide a large scale detail of the connection of the existing accessible route to the new accessible route located at the most easterly drive entrance and show how the existing curb ramp works with this connection.
THE PREVIOUS ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS COMMENT. REFERENCE RESUBMUITTAL COMMENT 2 AND RECONCILE.

6. Insure that all slopes of the new accessible route comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3.
ACKNOWLEDGED BUT NOT NOTED. AT NOTE 20 ADD THE FOLLOWING: "ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SLOPES ARE TO COMPLY WITH 2009 ICC A117.1, SECTION 403.3; 5% MAXIMUM RUNNING SLOPE AND 2% MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPES".

7. Insure accessibility of the new dumpsters shown on the circle drive as per zoning requirements.
OK

SHEET 6
8. Provide a reference detail number for each partial plan shown on this sheet and reference this number from the parking layouts shown on sheet 3.
OK

9. Parking Detail North:
a. Provide an accessible route to right of way and to all the buildings on the site.
b. Show slope percentage from north to south.
OK

10. Reference all signage shown on all details to detail C/7.
OK
END OF REVIEW
09/06/2013 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702

WR#262882 September 4, 2013

Cypress Civil Development
2102 N Country Club Rd, Suite 9
Tucson, Arizona 85716

Dear Cypress Civil Development:

SUBJECT: Marana Marketplace Phase III
DP13-0072

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 26, 2013. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.

TEP has UG facilities the northern portion of the property. Please see the highlighted facilities map attached. TEP will require a full set of approved site, electrical/load, and offsite improvement plans. Allow six weeks for Preliminary design once received. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Susie McCann at (520) 917-8741.

Sincerely,


Elizabeth Miranda
Office Support Specialist
Design/Build

Enclosures
cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email)
S. McCann, Tucson Electric Power
09/09/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: September 9, 2013
SUBJECT: Marana Market Place Phase III Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review
TO: Cypress Civil Development; Attn: Jeff Hunt
LOCATION: 6080 N Thornydale Road; T13S R13E Sec08
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0072


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report (Cypress Civil Development, 18APR13, revised 08AUG13), Geotechnical Engineering Report (LMT Engineering, Inc., 27SEP07, addendum dated 14AUG13) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Cypress Civil Development, 18APR13, revised 08AUG13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/unifieddevelopmentcode?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN:

1) Completed.

2) Completed.

3) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.3: It is acknowledged that a letter was submitted specifically describing how each condition of rezoning have been addressed, however not all rezoning comments have been addressed thoroughly. Specifically Rezoning Conditions #3, 7, 19 (provide any responses from adjacent property owners that requested identification of further drainage problems) and 23.

4) Completed.

5) Completed.

6) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan document to label all existing drainage infrastructure located within either the public right-of-way or adjacent to the site within Phase II development, include the infrastructure improvement plan number in plan view. Revise Keynote #10 to correctly detail the improvement.

7) Completed.

8) Completed.

9) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5: Provide a recorded copy of the cross access and cross parking agreement for all proposed access points from the existing Marana Market Place Phase II and the proposed Phase III project. The review of this project is only for the improvements to Phase III that fall within the jurisdiction of the City of Tucson. Approval of the development on Phase III that falls within the Town of Marana requires approval thru their Planning Department. Rezoning Condition #7.

10) Completed.

11) Completed.

12) Completed.

13) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: It is acknowledged that the easements that are to be abandoned have been removed from the plan set however documentation is still required from the Recorders office with SEQ# to verify that indeed these easements no longer exist.

14) Completed.

15) Completed.

16) Completed.

17) New: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document to provide a detail and Keynote for the proposed bleed pipe at the outlet of the new retention basin. Per the Drainage Report the bleed pipe is 12-inches with a 6-inch orifice plate. A detail must be provided for construction purposes.

18) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: It is acknowledged that the development plan document has been revised to include a detail for the proposed pre-cast 8'x3' CBCs under the driveway entrance; however the details/cross sections need to be revised to clearly label the required sidewalks that are shown in plan view for both proposed driveway entrances.

19) Completed.

20) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.5: Revise the development plan document to provide approval from the Town of Marana for all drainage designs and erosion protection that extends into their jurisdiction including all grading and proposed improvements associated with the portion of Phase III that lies within the jurisdiction of the Town of Marana.

21) Completed.

22) Completed.

23) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to include pedestrian access from the right-of-way of all proposed driveway locations to the proposed buildings or internal pedestrian access points per Rezoning Condition #23. Currently only the southern entrance delineates a sidewalk; however both new driveways are required to provide pedestrian circulation from the right-of-way to the buildings, revise.

24) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to provide a pedestrian circulation path along the south side of Building #3. A sidewalk is required adjacent to any building and parking spaces as shown on the development plan document, revise.

25) Completed.

26) Acknowledged.

27) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: It is acknowledged that the development plan document has been revised to provide a construction detail for the refuse enclosures; however per Rezoning Condition # 3 all Dumpsters shall be within an enclosed facility. Per UDC Sec.11.4.6 Enclosed & Enclosure - "A structure that confines an area. The term "enclosed building" means a building enclosed with solid walls from floor to ceiling. Any wall penetrations, such as doors and windows, must include door or window fixtures that can solidly enclose the entire opening." Revise the details to provide for an enclosure per the Rezoning Condition and UDC requirements.

DRAINAGE REPORT:

28) Completed.

29) Completed.


SWPPP: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments:

30) Completed.

31) Restated: Part III.D.1: A copy of AZPDES permit (AZG2013-001) was included with the SWPPP; however the 4th paragraph under the Executive Summary needs to be revised since it still references the 2008 permit, revise.

32) Restated: Part III.D.4: Identify any city or county which received a copy of the authorization certificate. Specifically the Town of Marana; the area of Phase III development that is located within the Town of Marana will require their direct approval and acknowledgement of any required NOIs due to Operator activity. Make sure all certificates and agency contact information sections references the Town of Marana and includes current contact information.

33) Restated: Part III.D.5: Include copies of other agreements with any state, local or federal agencies that would affect the provisions or implementation of the SWPPP, if applicable (404 permits, local grading permits, etc.). Specifically the Town of Marana; the area of Phase III development that is located within the Town of Marana will require their direct approval and acknowledgement of any required NOIs due to Operator activity

34) Completed.

35) Completed.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
09/09/2013 PGEHLEN1 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved Project approved by Environmental Services for Solid Waste and Recycle services.








Jeff Drumm, P.E.
Environmental Manager
City of Tucson Environmental Services
520-837-3713
09/09/2013 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved From Zelin Canchola
TDOT Traffic Engineering

Marana Market Place
DP13-0072

Development plan approved as shown.

Offsite immprovements will require a Private Improvement Agreement (PIA) Contact Permits and Codes at 791-4259 for further information.
09/10/2013 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements.

Revise the landscape plan to include the location and purpose of utility easements and other easements. Include dimensions. DS 2-07.2.2.E.1

Dimension the length and width of landscape borders on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f.

Within the 30' scenic route buffer area, indigenous plant material is to remain. If any disturbance occurs during construction or prior to permit application, the buffer area is to be revegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area reconstructed to look as natural as possible. DS 2-06.7.1.B

Label any proposed screen walls as new. Provide details for compliance with rezoning condition 10 and 11.

Clarify how the site complies with the specifics of rezoning conditions 2 and 24.
09/11/2013 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved CITY PLANNING

FROM:

MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW

SUBJECT:

DP13-0072 MARANA MARKETPLACE PHASE III/DEVELOPMENT PLAN

DATE:

September 11, 2013



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.


1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.




***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when
submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima
County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing
and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's
Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***
09/11/2013 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required.

Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two copies of the rolled plans
2) All items requested by review staff
3) All items needed to approved these plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/24/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed