Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP13-0072
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/03/2013 | MWYNEKE1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See comments in SIRE. |
| 05/06/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Marana Marketplace Phase III Development Package (1st Review) DP13-0072 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 8, 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed. This review includes the development package and scenic corridor review. 1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site. The following comments are based on the requirements of Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0. Development package review comments; 2. A.M. 2-06.4.3 Provide the development package number, DP13-0072, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. A.M. 2-06.4.4.C Label the sections corners on the location map. 4. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 General Note 16 lists the uses proposed in the C-1 zone. As there are uses proposed in the C-2 zone provide the dimensional standard requirements for the C-2 zone. 5. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 Provide the applicable use specific standards for all proposed uses shown under General Note 3. 6. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a Provide a general notes stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA SEC. 5.3 SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE & SEC. 5.4, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE. 7. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a As there appears to be some discrepancies between the square footage shown on the plan and in the calculations provide a general note that provides the floor area for each building. 8. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a Based on the square footage shown for "PROPOSED BUILDING 2", 100,519, this building meets the definition of UDC Section 11.39.c.2 Retail Establishment, Large. That said per UDC Table 4.8-4: PERMITED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES a Mayor and Council Special Exception Procedure is required per UDC Section 3.4.4. Provide documentation that is process has been completed and approved. 9. A.M. 2-06.4.8.B All existing easements shown to be "RELOCATED" of "ABANDONED" will need to be relocated or abandoned prior to approval of the development package. Show the new location for the easements to be relocated along with the recordation information on the plan. Provide the recordation information for the abandonment of the easement shown to be abandoned. 10. A.M. 2-06.4.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 11. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5 & 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Provide a copy of the recorded cross access and parking agreement for this proposed site and for access to Marana Marketplace Phase II. 12. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5 Provide a dimension from the north side of the "120' D TURNING CIRCLE" to Building 2. 13. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5 Along the north side of the "120' D TURNING CIRCLE" Keynote 25 calls out a curb transition. Clearly indicate on the plan where this occurs. 14. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. Based on the square footage shown within the foot print of the buildings shown on the plan the total square footage should be 154,188 / 300 requiring 514 vehicle parking spaces. 15. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Verify that the provided number of vehicle parking spaces shown on this plan only includes parking spaces that are shown completely on the COT zoned portion of this proposed site. 16. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c It does not appear that the proposed loading spaces meet the requirements of Rezoning condition #3 17. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d The provided bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC Section 7.4.8, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP*, The required number of bicycle parking spaces for multiple or mixed use development composed of more than one building are be calculated on a per building basis using the formulas provided above. That said the required number of bicycle parking is based on a per building square footage. Short-term bicycle parking requirements - Building #1 53,669/6000 = 9 required, Building #2 100,519/7000 = 14 required for a total of 23 required. Long-term bicycle parking requirements - Building #1 53,669/12,000 = 4 required, Building #2 100,519/7000 = 8 required for a total of 12 required. 18. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d The short-term bicycle parking shown for Building 1 does not meet the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.9.C.2.d 19. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.f show the required 2'x6' parking space on detail G sheet 7. 20. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.g A bicycle rack must be a minimum of two and one half feet from a wall or other obstruction. Show the 2'-6" dimension from the rack to the building on detail G sheet 7. 21. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.h An access aisle at least five feet wide must be provided between two rows of bicycle parking. The aisle width is measured between the lengthwise dimensions (i.e., 6') of the bicycle parking spaces between the two rows. Show the 5'-0" dimension between the 2'x6' space on detail G sheet 7. See UDC 7.4.9.E.2. 22. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O The perimeter yard setbacks listed under General Note 19 are not correct. Per Rezoning condition 8 the required east perimeter yard is sixty (60) feet and the required south perimeter yard is one hundred (100) feet. The required west or street perimeter yard should be listed as ninety (90) feet measured to the west property line. 23. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions for Building 1 to the street property line and for Building 2 to the east property line on the plan. 24. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Per rezoning conditions 23 provide the required pedestrian circulation from the internal pedestrian sidewalk system to the external pedestrian sidewalk at the two southern driveway access points. 25. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Per TSM 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said a sidewalk is required along the north and east side of Building 2. 26. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R West of the northwest corner of Building 2 are four (4) accessible vehicle parking spaces. Demonstrate on the plan how access is provided to the sidewalk located to the north. 27. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Provide a sidewalk width dimension for; Sidewalk located along the northwest side of Building 2. Between the trash enclosure and Building 1. Sidewalk located at the southwest corner of Building 1. From the east end of the access ramp to the building at the southwest corner of Building 1. 28. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Demonstrate on the plan how vehicles will be prevented from over hanging the sidewalk along the south side of Building 1. A minimum sidewalk width of four (4) feet must be maintained. 29. A.M. 2-06.4.9.U Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Provide building elevations and wall details. 30. A.M. 2-06.4.9.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0072 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & cross access & parking agreements. |
| 05/09/2013 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | |
| 05/09/2013 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Future structures will need to comply with the latest adopted fire code. |
| 05/09/2013 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAK ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 721-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP13-0072 MARANA MARKETPLACE PHASE III/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: May 6, 2013 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. On Final Development Plan: Include all tax parcels for project and show project # on all Sheets. Remove reference to 6080 N Thornydale Rd--it is admin address for Mp 48 Pg 94 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 05/09/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 05/09/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/09/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | This project does is not complete. Recycle services have not been addressed. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 05/13/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: May 13, 2013 SUBJECT: Marana Market Place Phase III Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Cypress Civil Development; Attn: Jeff Hunt LOCATION: 6080 N Thornydale Road; T13S R13E Sec08 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP13-0072 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report (Cypress Civil Development, 18APR13), Geotechnical Engineering Report (LMT Engineering, Inc., 27SEP07) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Cypress Civil Development, 18APR13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/UDC_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Technical_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Admin_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0072) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.C: Revise the development plan document to label the Section corners on the location map. 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.3: Provide a letter with the resubmittal that specifically describes how each condition of rezoning has been addressed. Verify that all rezoning conditions as shown on Sheet 2 have been completed. 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6.a: Revise the development plan document to provide a general notes stating; "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria Sec.5.3, Scenic Corridor Zone & Sec.5.4, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone." 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension all existing width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for the existing public right-of-way of River Road. 6) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan document to label all existing drainage infrastructure located within either the public right-of-way or adjacent to the site within Phase II development, include the infrastructure improvement plan number in plan view. Revise Keynote #9 to correctly detail the improvement. 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise Note #7 on Sheet 1 to reference the correct Technical Standard Manual (TSM) Sec.10-01.5.0 for SVT conformance since this project falls under the UDC requirements. 8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to correctly dimension the SVT's for both driveway entrance. The near side SVT should be dimensioned at 20'x345' and the far side dimension for a roadway with a median is 20'x30', revise. 9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5: Provide a recorded copy of the cross access and cross parking agreement for all proposed access points from the existing Marana Market Place Phase II and the proposed Phase III project. The review of this project is only for the improvements to Phase III that fall within the jurisdiction of the City of Tucson. Approval of the development on Phase III that falls within the Town of Marana requires approval thru their Planning Department. 10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide a separation along the vehicular use area in the turn around adjacent to the refuse location. The concrete header area must provide bollards to prevent cars or motorized vehicles from accessing this area. 11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise Detail I/7 to provide all dimensions for the proposed concrete curb transition. 12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan document to label River Road as a MS&R Street. 13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development plan document to include the easement abandonment or relocation with SEQ # for all existing easements that are proposed to be abandoned or relocated. All easements that are to be abandoned and relocated should not be shown on the development plan document since they should already be recorded and no longer exist. 14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise Paving & Grading Note #18 to reference the correct TSM Sec.2-01 for conformance with the Grading Standard since this review falls under the UDC requirements. 15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan document to delineate the grading limits in plan view. Grading limits are to include all work associated with the wash bank protection, driveway drainage infrastructure and the rip rap erosion protection along the eastern side of the development. 16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan document to clarify the total parcel area and the total disturbed area due to conflicting information found on the plan set, Drainage Report and SWPPP documentation. Verify that all disturbed area is included for drainage infrastructure and erosion protection. 17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Per the Geotechnical Report a stability analysis is require for all slopes great than 1.5:1. Per plan view and Detail K/7 the concrete bank protection is sloped at 1:1. Verify with the Drainage Report and Geotechnical Addendum that the slope design is adequate for slope stability. 18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development plan document to include a detail for all proposed drainage infrastructure, specifically the proposed pre-cast 8'x3' CBCs under the driveway entrances. The detail should show all construction details including invert elevations, headwall and wing wall design, slope, etc. since the development plan package will be used as the construction document. 19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.5: Revise the development plan document to provide approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for the construction of the proposed culverts headwall design located within the public right-of-way. Verify with the Real Estate Department if a construction and maintenance easement is required for any portion of infrastructure that extends into the public right-of-way. Or revise the design to show all improvements are located clearly onsite and only minimal improvements for the driveway entrance are within the public right-of-way. 20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.5: Revise the development plan document to provide approval from the Town of Marana for all drainage designs and erosion protection that extends into their jurisdiction including all grading and proposed improvements associated with the portion of Phase III that lies within the jurisdiction of the Town of Marana. 21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.6: Revise the development plan document to label and dimensions the 100-year water surface elevations for the regulatory wash within the channel adjacent to the roadway. Either label the floodplain limits in plan view or provide cross sections per the Drainage Report at a minimum of every 200-feet and at the upstream end of both proposed box culverts. 22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.6: Revise the development plan document to label the Q100 discharge in plan view for the regulatory wash. 23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to include pedestrian access from the right-of-way of all proposed driveway locations to the proposed buildings or internal pedestrian access points per Rezoning Condition #23. 24) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to provide a pedestrian circulation path along the north and east side of Building #2. Per TSM 7-01.4.1.B. a sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. 25) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension all required sidewalk width dimensions for the sidewalks located at the northwest side of Building #2, the southwest side of Building #1, and the sidewalk area adjacent to the refuse enclosure and Building #1. Verify all sidewalk widths adjacent to parking spaces to ensure the required 4-foot space, provide wheel stops if applicable (specifically south side of Building #1). 26) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 27) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan document to provide a construction detail for the refuse enclosures. The detail must match TSM Sec.8-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc. DRAINAGE REPORT: 28) TSM Sec.4-03.2.2: Revise the discussion within the Drainage Report to include full 5-year retention onsite due to the non-designated basin criteria (commercial, greater than 1 acre therefore 5 year retention is required). 5-year retention can not be waived for this Phase of the development per the Master Drainage Design of Marana Market Place. Since Phase I and II of the development lies within the Town of Marana the overall site design was reviewed and approved through them. Per a discussion with Paul Baughman, Town of Marana, Phase III can not waive the retention requirements downstream. Since the project is within a non-designated basin detention requirements are not applicable however the site must fully retain the entire 32,326 cubic feet of storm water as calculated within the Drainage Report. 29) TSM Sec.4-04.2.3.1.4.C.8: Revise the development plan document to label the 100-year floodplain limit, or if the 100-year floodplain limits are entirely contained within a constructed drainageway it shall be labeled as such on the plan set or a general note shall be included on the plan that states the same. If labeling X-section for the WSEL sections per the Report they must be minimum 200-feet apart and at the upstream end of each proposed culvert. SWPPP: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 30) Part III.C.3.b: Show areas of soil disturbance and areas that will not be disturbed. Specifically revise the Exhibits to show complete grading limits in plan view. Provide the areas for the erosion protection and culverts within the right-of-way and include the proposed rock rip rap protection located along the eastern side of the parcel adjacent to the existing culvert. 31) Part III.D.1: A copy of AZPDES permit (AZG2008-001) was included with the SWPPP. As an FYI refer to the following website from AZDEQ for the new AZPDES 2013 CGP and expiration dates of the existing 2008 CGP; http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/cgp.html 32) Part III.D.4: Identify any city or county which received a copy of the authorization certificate. Specifically the Town of Marana; the area of Phase III development that is located within the Town of Marana will require their direct approval and acknowledgement of any required NOIs due to Operator activity. 33) Part III.D.5: Include copies of other agreements with any state, local or federal agencies that would affect the provisions or implementation of the SWPPP, if applicable (404 permits, local grading permits, etc.). Specifically the Town of Marana; the area of Phase III development that is located within the Town of Marana will require their direct approval and acknowledgement of any required NOIs due to Operator activity 34) Part IV.B.1: Revise the Exhibit to describe measures that will be used to minimize erosion at and around the proposed culverts within the Right-of-Way including the existing culvert adjacent to the Phase II development. 35) Part IV.E.2: Identify and provide the location(s) of all non-stormwater discharges allowed by this permit expected to be associated with the project and describe BMPs used to minimize discharge of pollutants. Specifically provide sediment protection labeled on the Exhibit (and Report if applicable) for the proposed grading for the concrete bank protection and toe down located within the regulatory wash. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Report and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 05/17/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#262882 May 31, 2012 Cypress Civil Development 2102 N Country Club Rd, Suite 9 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Dear Cypress Civil Development SUBJECT: Marana Marketplace Phase III DP13-0072 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted April 30, 2013. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. TEP has UG facilities in the northern portion of the property. Please see the highlighted facilities map attached. TEP will require a full set of approved site, electrical/load, and offsite improvement plans. Allow six weeks for Preliminary design once received. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact the area Designer, Susie McCann at 917-8741 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Specialist lm Enclosure cc: DSD_CDRC@Tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson S. McCann, Tucson Electric Power |
| 05/20/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PAG - PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Here are my comments - DATE: 5/17/2013 CASE: DP13-0072 MARANA MARKETPLACE - PHASE III COMMENT: No objections or adverse comments Daily PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation: 6,713 583 Thanks, -Eric Additional notes: I concur with the traffic projections estimated by Cypress Civil Development in the Traffic Impact Statement for Marana Marketplace - Phase III |
| 05/21/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 1 1. At note 15, please state full compliance for all accessible requirements as per the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and 2009 Edition, ICC A117.1. SHEET 3 2. Insure all existing marked crossings at the two drive entrances have detectable warnings as per 2009 ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. 3. Provide an accessible route connection from building 3 to the public right of way and buildings 1 and 2. 4. Reference all the different accessible parking layouts to their respective details shown on sheet 7. 5. Provide a large scale detail of the connection of the existing accessible route to the new accessible route located at the most easterly drive entrance and show how the existing curb ramp works with this connection. 6. Insure that all slopes of the new accessible route comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3. 7. Insure accessibility of the new dumpsters shown on the circle drive as per zoning requirements. SHEET 6 8. Provide a reference detail number for each partial plan shown on this sheet and reference this number from the parking layouts shown on sheet 3. 9. Parking Detail North: a. Provide an accessible route to right of way and to all the buildings on the site. b. Show slope percentage from north to south. 10. Reference all signage shown on all details to detail C/7. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/22/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the points of connection to existing public sewers. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 05/28/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the plans to comply with the landscape related conditions of rezoning. C9-03.12 Trees and shrubs must be selected and located so that, at maturity, they do not interfere with existing on- site or off- site utility service lines or utility easements. AM 5-01.5.11 |
| 05/28/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Zelin Canchola TDOT Traffic Engineering PROJECT: Marana Marketplace Phase III Development Package (1st Review) DP13-0072 Revise site plan to reflect rezoning condition 3: The developer shall install a right turn deceleration lane on River Road with a 100 foot stacking capability and a 120 foot on taper. This should be placed according to main entrance of the development. Add note, conact City of Tucson permits and codes 791-5100 for work within the right of way. Revise sight visibility triangle near side to 345 feet. (Technical Standard Manual section 10-01 5.3 |
| 05/29/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 05/29/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/29/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 05/29/2013 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | |
| 05/29/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 05/29/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 05/29/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 05/29/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal. The development lies outside any ADOT facilities, which will have no effect to the system and recommends its acceptance. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 05/30/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Approv-Cond | Hi, I have reviewed the final plans for the above mentioned development. Centurylink has a buried cable in the public utility easement that runs east and west and is located south of Cantaloupe Drive. Centurylink also has a cable in the public utility easement that runs east and varies north west located north of Cantaloupe Drive. Also we have cable and conduit along the east side of Riber road, which is on the west side of this development. The cables would have to be located to validate their exact location. Also, if the cables mentioned need to be relocated billing to the developer would be required. Thank you, Tom Whittaker Centurylink Field Engineer For Jihad Farhat |
| 06/04/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed. Resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two copies of the rolled plans, 2) One disk containing all items submitted in paper, 3) All items requested by review staff, 4) All items needed to approve this plan. |
| 06/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I do not have an issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/12/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |