Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP13-0066
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2013 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Passed | This is a COT Owned property, reference ADA folder for accessibility review |
| 04/17/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/18/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: WWII Monument @ Armory Park Development Package (1st Review) DP13-0066 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 19, 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed. 1. Zoning has reviewed the development package for this project and has not objection. 2. Zoning cannot approve the development package until the historic review is complete and the required 14 review period has been completed. Historic will need to stamp the development package prior to Zoning approval. 3. Once the above comments are addressed Zoning is willing to provide and over-the-counter review. Please call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0057 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Historic stamped development package. |
| 05/06/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall not be considered through an HPZ review. |
| 05/06/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/08/2013 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET CS 1. At the code analysis data menu: a. This is a City of Tucson owned and operated project which requires all accessibility requirements to be goverened by the 2010 ADASAD. Please revise your accessibility code accordingly. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/11/2013 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DECISION REC'D | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DECISION | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |