Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0061
Parcel: 13323090A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0061
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/11/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
04/16/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: April 24, 2013
SUBJECT: Starbucks Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Perry Engineering Attn: Ken Perry, PE
LOCATION: 7890 E Speedway Blvd; T14S R15E Sec08
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0061

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (Perry Engineering, 10APR13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/UDC_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Technical_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Admin_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.3.12: Revise the development plan document and Sheet count to read Sheet 1 of 6, currently the plan set only accounts for 4 sheets, however the landscape sheets need to be included in the sheet count.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4: Revise the development plan document to remove the reference to "Proposed" Site Plan. The label should read "Site Plan" only.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0061) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan document, specifically General Note #4 to reference the special overlay zone that is applicable to this site, specifically state that "the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone."

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.B.2.a: Revise the development plan document to include the flowing note; "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations."

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.B.2.b: Revise the development plan document to include the flowing note; "A Floodplain Use Permit and Finished Floor Elevation Certificates are required."

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development plan document, specifically General Note #9 to read per the referenced Section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Sec.10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." SVTs must be shown on the plan for the existing PAAL entrances.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan document to label the existing drainage infrastructure located within the public right-of-way of Pantano Rd, include the infrastructure improvement plan number in plan view.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: It is acknowledged that the applicant has been in discussion with TDOT for the required 25-foot radii at the driveway entrances per the City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Provide written approval from TDOT that the proposed project does not have to meet the minimum 25-foot radii and a smaller radii or standard driveway apron can be utilized.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension the existing/future SVTs for both driveway entrances. Verify that the SVTs are clear of obstructions, for the entrance off of Pantano there is an existing bus shelter that will encroach into the SVT area, provide a DSMR to modify the standard to allow the obstruction and provide any condition of approval on the plan set.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to dimension the access lane adjacent to the proposed refuse enclosure. The minimum 20-foot dimension must be shown to assure that when the refuse gates are in the open position the access drive is clear for 2 way traffic.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to dimension both PAAL entrances. Verify minimum 2-way access for all entrances and PAALs onsite per UDC Sec.7.4.6.D.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan document to include all dimensions for the MS&R Streets adjacent to the project. Provide dimensions for the sidewalk area, sight visibility triangles, existing sidewalks, etc.

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan document to provide the cut and fill quantities for grading plan purposes and for grading fees. The Cut and Fill quantities need to be shown on the grading sheet.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan document to label Cross Section J/C4 in plan view on the proposed grading plan sheet. Revise the plan and cross section to allow for the minimum 2-foot setback from the toe of slope to the property line.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development plan document to label the width of all proposed curb openings as depicted by Keynote #6. Per Detail E/C4 the detail references plan view for all opening widths; however none of the curb opening widths are labeled in plan view, revise. Revise the Keynote label at the Pantano driveway to label Keynote #6 instead of Keynote #8 as shown.

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.7: Revise the drainage statement to provide a discussion with calculations for the proposed offsite flows in the northeast corner of the site. All flows across the public sidewalk must provide sidewalk scupper to ensure that it contains the 10-year flow event to satisfy TSM Sec.7-01.4.1.E.

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to include a description of Keynote #30 that is being used in plan view within the Keynote legend.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan document and detail G/C4 for the refuse enclosures to show that it meets the TSM Sec.8-01 (not the referenced DS Sec.6-01). The detail must match TSM Sec.8-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, anchoring bolts, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Verify on the development plan document the minimum access width for the access drive adjacent to the refuse container location. A minimum 20-foot is required for the drive with the refuse gate doors are in the open position. Verify that the door when open as shown is not impeded by the existing 6-inch concrete curb.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
04/25/2013 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/25/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The landscape plan will identification in the lower right corner of each sheet the development plan case number AM 2-10.4.2.B

2. Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line DS 7.6.4.C.2.a. Street landscape borders along speedway are not 10' wide.

3. Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets DS 7.6.4.C.2.c.

4. Indicate on the relevant development plan documents the dimension of the existing/future SVTs for both driveway entrances. Verify that SVTs are clear of possible obstructions AM 2-06.4.9.H.2.

5. Note: A 30" screen is required for all vehicle use areas and drive thru visible from streets per DS TABLE 7.6.4-1. A 5' screen is indicated .

6. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

7. Additional comments may apply
04/26/2013 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
04/30/2013 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP13-0061
7890 E. Speedway Bl
Development Package

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 05/02/2013

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. DS 2-06.3.11 It appears that the plan indicated on sheet C-1 of 4 is a reference plan only and not a complete site plan. Label as a reference site plan only and rename the indicated grading plan as a site/grading plan.

2. DS 2-06.4.2.E The sheet numbering shall include the landscape plans as well. Revise. See landscape comments but the approval stamp required is not provided on the landscape plans.

3. DS 2-06.4.7.A.2 In general note number 2 the indicated parcel number is incorrect. Revise.

4. DS 2-06.47.A.4 In general note number 3 the proposed use is incorrect. Should be as per the UDC Sec. 4.8.6 as follows: Food Services subject to 4.9.4.M.1 & 5 and 4.9.13.O.

5. DS 2-06.4.7.A.6 Remove general note number 4 and replace with: This project is designed to meet the criteria of UDC Sec 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone (MS&R).

6. DS 2-06.4.3 This project has been assigned case number DP13-0061. Place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets.

7. DS 2-06.4.7.A.8.b Remove general note number 6. Floor area ratio is not a requirement of the UDC.

8. DS 2-06.4.8.A On sheet C3 of 4 provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

9. DS 2-06.4.8.B If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated.
10. DS 2-06.4.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

11. DS 2-06.4.9.H.5 Clearly indicate the width of the PAAL near the southwest corner of the lot where accessing into the adjacent lot.

On the first sheet the PAAL width at the loading zone is indicated as 24'. On sheet C-3 at the parallel parking spaces the PAAL width is also indicated as 24' but does not line up with the loading zone. Clarify.

12. DS 2-06.4.9.H.5.c Provide in the notes that zero loading zones are required but one loading zone is being provided.

13. DS 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Sec. 7.4.8.B.1.a.1 No long-term bicycle parking is required on a site where there is less than 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. If using this section of the code revise the number of required and provided long term bicycle parking spaces.

Per UDC Sec. 7.4.9-C Bicycle parking layout figure. Clearly indicate on detail H/C4 the required 2'x 6' bicycle parking space as well as the required 5' access aisle.

14. DS 2-06.4.9.J The project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route on two sides, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

15. DS 2-06.4.9.O Provide dimensions for the required building setback measured to the back of future curb along Speedway and Pantano Rd.

16. DS 2-06.4.9.R The portion of the pedestrian circulation path west of the building where the two cross walks connect at the island must be physically separated from the vehicular use area. Either raised with handicap ramps or a curb along the south side of the parking space.

The cross walk indicated leading to the trash enclosure along the west side of the island must be constructed of concrete and physically separated from the vehicle use area.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961
04/30/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the site utility plan to show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly. Backflow prevention assemblies shall be located as close as practicable to the service connection and in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and Tucson Water's standard installation details. Reference: Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
2. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is allowed to be used at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; otherwise, cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012.
3. Revise the site utility plan to show the location and size of the public sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
4. If the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is above or less than 12" below the first floor elevation, provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
05/03/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Approved SHEET C3
1. Verify with COT/DOT the accessible route connection to the Speedway pedestrian way actually works at that location.
2. Insure that all marked crossing slopes comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3, 5% max. running and 2% max cross.
3. Insure all detectable warning strips comply with ICC A117.1, Sections 405.12, 13 and/or 14 and 705; minimum 2' deep.
4. Insure that slopes of all accessible routes comply with ICC A117.1, sections 403.3, 5% max running slope and 2% max cross.
5. Show accessible parking and aisle slopes in compliance with ICC A117.1, Section 402.5.
6. Show accessible parking space depth dimension.
7. Provide a detectable warning strip oriented in the direction of travel at the sidewalk ramp landing just prior to the accessible parking aisle.
8. Reference zoning comments: The "L" shape section of concrete walkway will need a 6" separation curb or approved equal along the entire edge of the parking space.
9. At the striped crosswalk just south of the drive entrance to the south end of the parking space landscape peninsula:
a. This length of pedestrian way will be required by zoning to be concrete and be separated from the auto traffic. Reference zoning comments.
b. Start this new concrete pedestrian way (accessible route) with a detectable warning strip.
c. Provide a 5'x5' landing at the bottom of the 6' long sidewalk ramp.
d. The pedestrian way to the dumpster is not required to be accessible. 6" steps and 6" curbs are acceptable.
10. Note 25 refers to detail/C4. No such detail exists on sheet C4.
11. Please provide a large scale detail of the plan of the retaining wall and landings with accessible route and show all grades, retaining wall section, handrail and where it's to be located either on top of the retaining wall or on the sidewalk (both ways are shown on plan and detail A/C3), dimensions and slopes.
END OF REVIEW

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/07/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed