Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP13-0046
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 2510 E. Broadway Blvd. - Façade Development Package (2nd Review) DP13-0046 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 22, 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed. 1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the areas of change only, i.e. façade elevation changes and parking. The following comments are based on Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0: 1. This comment was not addressed. The provided last approved site plan has the required information. A.M. 2-06.4.8.A Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted. 2. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.2 Per TSM Section 10-01.5.1.A.1 Lines of sight will not be obscured between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet through a triangular area adjacent to a driveway, a PAAL, an alley, or a street, where such access ways intersect with another street in a T-configuration. That said the proposed bicycle parking encroaches in the future line of site. 3. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c As you have elected to block off the south entrance access lane show the maneuverability requirement for the existing loading space. 4. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.f Each required short-term bicycle parking space must be at least two feet by six feet not the two feet by five feet shown on the short-term detail. 5. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d There is a 2'-6" dimension shown on the short-term detail, what is this for. Is this the required distance to the long-term locker? 6. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.d A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles. That said based on the short-term bicycle parking shown on the plan the short-bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Provided should be shown as four (4). 7. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d The proposed location of the short & long term bicycle parking appears to conflict with proposed landscape. Ensure that the site and landscape plan match. 8. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O Per UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1 the required west street perimeter yard is 21' or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, which ever is greatest measured from the back of future curb. Based on a wall height of 28.5' the required west street perimeter yard is 28.5' proposed west street perimeter yard 9.58'. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. 9. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O Per UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1 the required south street perimeter yard is 21' or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, which ever is greatest measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. Based on a wall height of 28.5' the required west street perimeter yard is 28.5' proposed west street perimeter yard 20.75'. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. 10. If the Board of Adjustment for Variance is approved provide the variance number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval as a general note on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0046 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 05/23/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | No comments on the landscape plan submitted. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP / Landscape approval stamp. AM 2-06.4.3. Show all relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) on each sheet of submitted plans. If necessary include variance approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the variance case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 05/24/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/29/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 06/25/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/25/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |