Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0040
Parcel: 123052150

Address:
1900 E GRANT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP13-0040
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/11/2013 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/12/2013 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed Not a government agency project, reference H/C SITE for accessibility review
03/14/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Retail Development - 1900 E. Grant
Development Package (1st Review)
DP13-0040


TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 18, 2013

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed.

1. This site was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site.

The following comments are based on Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) 2-06.0:

1. A.M. 2-06.4.3 Provide the development package number, DP13-0040, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.4 Provide the information within in DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTE 3, GENERAL MERCHANDANDISE SALES SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS - "4.9.9.B.3 and 4.9.13.O".

3. A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a Provide a General Note stating the floor area for each building.

1. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.4 Provide street widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

2. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5 Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. That said provide a width dimension from what appears to be railing shown at the "PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE PARKING GARAGE" to the one-way drive.

3. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5 Provide a width dimension for the two (2) vehicle entrances off of Norris Avenue.

4. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5 Demonstrate on the plan how vehicle access will be controlled for the propose "ONE-WAY DRIVE", i.e. signs, pavement markings, etc.

5. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Provide documentation that the adjacent parking garage has 18 spaces available for this site to use.

6. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a A cross parking and access agreement will be required for use of the parking garage.

7. A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Some type of signage will be required for use of the parking garage.

8. A.M. 2-06.4.9.J It does not appear that the MS&R future right-of-way (ROW) is show correctly. Contact Mike Holder @837-6723 to verify future ROW requirements.

9. A.M. 2-06.4.9.O The call out for the MS&R perimeter yard setback, 21' SETBACK FROM FUTURE TRAVEL LANE" shown just north of building 1 is not correct. Due to the average daily traffice (ADT) this setback is measured from the back of future curb.

10. A.M. 2-06.4.9.R Provide width dimensions for all proposed sidewalks on site.

11. As you are not developing the site to meet future ROW a future site plan showing how the site with meet code requirements when/if the future ROW is taken is required, Also a MS&R covenant must be recorded prior to approval of the plan, provide a copy of the recorded covenant with your next submittal.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0040

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & recorded MS&R covenant
03/14/2013 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Denied The solid waste enclosure is correct and to standards. Recycle is not addressed therefore the project is incomplete and not approved.



Jeff Drumm, P.E.
Environmental Manager
City of Tucson Environmental Services
520-837-3713
03/21/2013 KBROUIL1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
03/22/2013 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702

WR#260930 March 22, 2013

Rick Engineering Company
3945 E. Fort Lowell, Suite 111
Tucson, Arizona 85712

Dear Rick Engineering:

SUBJECT: 1900 E. Grant Rd.
SE Corner of Grant Rd. / Campbell Ave.
DP13-0040

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 13, 2013. It appears that there is one conflict with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. The existing underground facilities will need to be removed when existing buildings are demolished.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will not be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244.

Sincerely,


Elizabeth Miranda
Office Support Specialist
Design/Build
lm
Enclosures
cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email)
M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power
04/01/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: April 2, 2013
SUBJECT: SEC Grant/Campbell Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Rick Engineering Co.; Attn: Dan Castro
LOCATION: 1900 E Grant Road; T14S R14E Sec05
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0040

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Report (Rick Engineering Co., 08MAR13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/UDC_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Technical_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Admin_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN: Due to the full code expansion requirement per the Zoning Section make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within the UDC, AM and TSM and are reflected on the site plan sheets.

1) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0040) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan document to dimension the existing width of right-of-way, paving, curbs and sidewalks for all streets.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan document to label the existing drainage infrastructure located within the public right-of-way, include the infrastructure improvement plan number in plan view.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.A: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension the lot lines with distances and measurements.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the required 25-foot radii at all proposed driveway locations on both MS&R Streets per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to TSM Sec.10-01 for street development standards.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the required 18-foot radii at both proposed driveway locations on Norris Ave per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to TSM Sec.10-01 for street development standards. Any reduction in radii (as proposed with the 12-foot exit along Norris Ave) will require a Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR).

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to dimension both PAAL entrances off of Norris Ave. Verify minimum 2-way access for all entrances and PAALs onsite per UDC Sec.7.4.6.D.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide the required 2-foot setback from the PAAL to the railing adjacent to the pedestrian connection to the parking garage per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.2.b.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Provide approval through TDOT for all future right-of-way improvements and dimensions associated with the Grant Road.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan document, specifically Sheet 3, to include all dimensions for the MS&R Streets adjacent to the project. Provide dimensions for future right-of-way, sidewalk area, intersection tapering, etc.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development plan document to include the SEQ # for the proposed public sidewalk easement as shown by separate instrument. Provide the SEQ # in plan view for verification.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: For future reference a grading plan and grading permit will be required for the proposed work. Since the project size is over an acre a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will also be required at grading plan submittal.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Provide approval from TDOT for the proposed reconstructed catch basin located within the right-of-way of Campbell Ave. A PIA maybe required for all right-of-way improvements. Provide a revised Drainage Report that addresses this proposed change with supporting calculations to ensure that the proposed grate can accept the same volume of flow as the existing catch basin.

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document and associated Keynotes to reference the PC/COT Standard Detail #200 for Public Improvement for all proposed concrete sidewalks, or provide a separate detail for construction purposes.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise or clarify a refuse container location for both buildings. It appears that the building on the eastside has a trash compactor; however the area is not Keynoted or labeled. Clarify that all refuse requirements are meet per TSM Sec.8-01.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Verify with ES that a recycling area for recycling containers is not required under this development. Provide written notification if ES is not requiring this area.


DRAINAGE REPORT:

17) Provide a revised Drainage Report that addresses the proposed reconstructed catch basin to grate within the Campbell Ave right-of-way with supporting calculations to ensure that the proposed grate can accept the same volume of flow as the existing catch basin with out adversely impacting the public roadway.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
04/02/2013 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied SHEETS 3 AND 4
1. Note 8 reference detail is not relative to the 3 ramp, pedestrian "T" intersection. Please provide a separate, specific detail of this ramp configuration.
2. Please provide a slope direction arrow for all curb and sidewalk ramps shown on these sheets.
3. Where the accessible route is flush with the asphaltic paving, please indicate such.
4. Note 10 needs to read "Marked Crossing".
5. Please indicate that all accessible route slopes are in compliance with the 2009 Edition, ICC A117.1, Section 403.3, 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slopes.
6. At the south west corner of the bigger building, why is there a pensula curb ramp when all the concrete accessible routes are flush with the asphaltic paving?
7. Delete all detectable warnings strips at the accessible parking aisles for the 4 accessible parking paces. An accessible parking aisle is a safe zone.
8. Show the marked crossing slopes in compliance with the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3. Reference comment 5.
END OF REVIEW
04/03/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
b. The locations of any gas lines, communications cables, or on-ground junction boxes.
c. Any existing or proposed utility easements
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
04/05/2013 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied DATE: April 5, 2013
SUBJECT: SEC Grant/Campbell Development Plan Package- TDOT Traffic Engineering Review
LOCATION: 1900 E Grant Road; T14S R14E Sec05
REVIEWERS: Zelin Canchola
ACTIVITY: DP13-0040

AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the required
25-foot radii at all proposed driveway locations on both MS&R Streets per City of
Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to TSM
Sec.10-01 for street development standards.

AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the required
18-foot radii at both proposed driveway locations on Norris Ave per City of Tucson
Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to TSM Sec.10-01
for street development standards.

5.0 - 5.3 Access Management Guidlines - Turning Lanes - Resubmit plan to reflect a eastbound right turn lane into the Grant Road driveway. Include bicycle lane and signage.

5.0 - 5.10 Access Management Guidlines - Driveway Turning Movement Restrictions. On plan show right in, right out turn restriction, accomplished with driveway directional island. Include signing.

Zelin Canchola
TDOT Traffic Engineering
04/08/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide the development package number, DP13-0040, adjacent to the title block on all sheets A.M. 2-06.4.3.

2. Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border must be measured from the future MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Section 5.4.4, Establishment of MS&R Right-of-Way Lines and Gateway Routes. DS 7.6.4.C.2

3. Note: Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets.

4. An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with UDC standards when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan shall be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the UDC at no cost to the City UDC 5.4.5.F.

5. All new commercial development and site plans submitted after June 1, 2010, shall include a rainwater harvesting plan. The rainwater harvesting plan shall include a landscape water budget and an implementation plan Sec. 6-182 (Ord. No. 10597, ยง 1, 10-14-08). Submit plan with information specified within 4-01.0.0 COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING / TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL.

6. The development package must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between plans. Ensure that all changes to the site and grading plans are reflected on the landscape plan.

7. Additional comments may apply.
04/09/2013 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please include the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) Disk containing all plans and documents submitted
3) Other items requested by review staff
4) Items already approved.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/12/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed