Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - OK TO SUBMIT
Permit Number - DP13-0038
Review Name: DEV PKG - OK TO SUBMIT
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/05/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 03/05/2013 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/06/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP13-0038 and T13CM01244 3615 E Golf Links Road Development Package (Site) for Medical Marijuana Cultivation Location And T.I. application for interior remodel TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The following Zoning Review comments must be addressed and plans revised to reflect changes made related tot eh zoning comments. 2. All zoning code data needs to be revised to reflect the UDC. If the applicant wishes to have the planned reviewed and approved based on the LUC the LUC waiver must be signed at the next submittal. There are some drawbacks by using the LUC, such as, by the end of the year the ability to do a DDO, Variance or any other type process will go away. But the applicant will be stuck with the LUC for 3 years or a new DP will have to be submitted for review and approval under the UDC. (It is to the applicant's advantage to have the site plan reviewed under the UDC. 3. A concrete sidewalk is required between the Parking Spaces and the buildings labeled as suite 101 and 119. The minimum width of the sidewalk must be four feet and must be connected to the accessible route. The parking lot behind the fence includes a H. C. Parking space which must have an access aisle that is connected to the accessible route. Clearly identify which striped area is the access aisle. If the access aisle is the driver side of the vehicle, the striped area on the passenger side of the vehicle becomes the accessible sidewalk. The portion of the striped area (sidewalk), the full length of the vehicle parking space must be constructed of concrete and physically separated from the parking space as well as the PAAL. The portion of the striped area adjacent to the north side of suite 119, must also be constructed of concrete and physically separated from the vehicular use area. Dimension the width all sidewalks. The Minimum width requirement is four (4) feet. IF truncated domes area required (verify with Ron Brown ADA reviewer) draw and label the locations per Ron Brown's direction. 4. Label the width and length of the parking spaces. One space can be dimensioned and labeled as typical. Dimension the H.C. parking space and label if the spaces is designed for a van space. 5. Dimension and label the PAALs and any specific vehicular use area designed to be used as PAALs. 6. Label the width of the gate providing access tot eh parking spaces in the north parking lot. The width must be a minimum of 24 feet for two way traffic. Also add a note stating that the gate is to remain open during business hours, unless the spaces are excess parking spaces. 7. The zoning code data will have to be revised regardless of which code is selected. The Proposed use of this site is listed under the retail trade use group. All relevant zoning data such as, vehicle and bicycle parking, loading zones, setbacks, etc must be revised to reflect the retail trade use group criteria. All suites have to be labeled with a use and all applicable development criteria for each use must be addressed and listed on the site plan. The site plan cannot be approved with the requested information. 8. After reviewing the site plan and the building plans there is a concern about the access from the suite reserved for the MM Cultivation use to the other suites. In addition, after discussing with the Architect what is proposed for the overall building, zoning cannot approve the site or the building plans the following changes are made. All proposed doors depicted on the building plans that provide access from the MM Suite to the other suites must be removed and door openings must be filled in. No access is allowed to any of the other suites which would create an expansion of greater square footage than is allowed by the Ordinance. 9. The zoning comments are minor and the revised site and building plans can be reviewed by over the counter by zoning and approve both application permits if compliance with the development criteria and compliance with zoning comments is verified by the zoning reviewer. 10. See the site plan for mark ups by the zoning reviewer that relate to the zoning comments. If you have any questions feel free to call or email me. 11. Ensure that all zoning comments are addressed and that all revised sheets are re-stamped by all plans reviewers. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 837- 4957 / david.rivera@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 03/11/2013 | FRODRIG2 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/11/2013 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Passed |