Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP13-0027
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/05/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/05/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Project is not approved for Environmental Services. There is no Recycle Enclosure or a description of alternative recycle in notes. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 03/05/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | |
| 03/05/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/07/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic has no comments on this development and recommends its acceptance. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 03/07/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/07/2013 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | If project is built under the IBC then the buildings will be required to have an automatic fire sprinkler system installed. |
| 03/11/2013 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | P&DS TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: DP13-0027 701 East Adams Street Multi-family O-3 (Condominiums) TRANSMITTAL: March 11, 2013 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (Section 8.4.1), the Administrative Manual (Section 2-06). See Technical Manual Section 7 for pedestrian access. See UDC Section 8.4.2 for and AM 2-07 for condominium subdivision and final plat requirements. Also see UDC Section 7.4.9 for bicycle parking design requirements. 1) This site is located in the O-3 zone (UDC 4.7.15). Multi-family residential is a permitted use in this zone (UDC Section 4.8.5 &Table 4.8-3). 2) Provide a final plat for the condominium subdivision (UDC Section 8.4.2 and AM Section 2-07). 3) Identify and label the common areas individually with separate letter designations (AM 2-06.4.9.C). Only the limited common areas have been specifically designated on the plan. The limited common areas also require letter designations. The general use and the vehicle use common areas must also be identified with letter designations and square footage. All designation must match the final plat. 4) Provide the subdivision case number in the lower-right corner of each sheet (AM 2-06.4.7.A.7). 5) Provide a fully dimensioned bicycle parking detail for the short-term bicycle parking (AM 2-06.4.9.H.5.d). See UDC Section 7.4.9 for bicycle parking design requirements. 6) Pedestrian access must be provided to all public streets (TS 7-01.3.3.A) and dumpsters (TS 7-01.3.3.B). Provide pedestrian circulation to 1st Avenue and to the dumpster as part of the continuous pedestrian circulation (TS 7-01.3). 7) Provide floor plans for each unit and dimensioned elevations for each building (AM 2-06.4.9.Q). Provide the architectural drawings referred to on the site plan. 8) The required setback to the north and east property lines is the greater of ten (10) feet or three-quarters the height of each vertical plain (UDC Table 6.3-3.A). Provide the dimension from the buildings' second floor to the north property line. The height measured for setbacks is measured from the ground to each wall's highest point of the building (UDC Section 6.4.5.B.1 & Fig 6.4.5-A). Provide the height of each exterior wall. 9) There are three building height references on the site plan (Sheet C-1). Building heights, and the measurement of each wall's height for setbacks, are not the same. The measurement for building height is from design grade to the highest point of the flat roof in this instance (UDC Section 6.4.4 & Fig 6.4.4-A). (See the previous comment for setback height measurements.) Provide the building height on the site plan (the 22' ?). The allowed building height is correct. We do not use an average building height. 10) Provide the location for the gang mailboxes on the site plan (AM 2-06.4.9.V). Be certain that the mailboxes are accessible and that there are no conflicts with other requirements on the site. 11) Indicate the location and type of all proposed signage for the site to assure that there are no conflicts with other site requirements (AM 2-06.4.9.W). There are no further comments at this time. |
| 03/12/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | Letter is in SIRE |
| 03/12/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, BY M. NOWAK,ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP13-0027/ 1ST ADAMS CONDOMINIUM HOMES DATE: MARCH 11, 2103 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Spell out Avenue for 1st Avenue on Sheet 1. 2. Include project # on Sheet 1 -DP13-0027 3. To the legal description add: "Portion of Block 9" University Home Addition in Title Block. |
| 03/15/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | No objections/adverse comments. See attached Attachment is in SIRE ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG_logotype 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 792-1093 x506 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagnet.org <mailto:ekramer@pagnet.org> ekramer@pagnet.org |
| 03/19/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: March 25, 2013 SUBJECT: 1st Adams Condominium Homes Development/Tentative Plan Package- Engineering TO: Oracle Engineering Attn: Peter Salonga, PE LOCATION: 701 E Adams Street; T14S R14E Sec06 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP13-0027 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Storm Drainage Statement (Oracle Engineering Group, Inc., 20FEB13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/UDC_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Technical_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Admin_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0027) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan document to include a General Note on Sheet 1 that references the DSMR # along with the date of approval and any associated conditions, if applicable. 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.3: Revise the development plan document to include the following note as applicable: a. "Total miles of new public streets is ____________." b. "Total miles of new private streets is ____________." 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.C: Revise the development plan document to clearly label Common Area "A" in plan view. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document and Keynote #11 that references the ICC ramps within the public right-of-way. All details for public improvements must meet the PC/ COT SD #207 for the curb access ramps at the driveway entrance. 6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to dimension the existing far side sight visibility triangle for the intersection of 1st Avenue and Adams Street per TSM Sec.10-01.5.3. 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to include the required vehicular separation from the access drive to the area adjacent to the refuse enclosure per UDC Sec.7.4.6.H.1. 8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to include the required vehicular separation at the end of the access drive per UDC Sec.7.4.6.H.1. 9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan documents to provide the minimum dimensions and radii for the required back-up spur at the end of the access drive per LUC 3.3.6.D. 10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Verify with TDOT the need for both proposed scuppers within the public right-of-way under the sidewalk. The proposed swales would be better if they would daylight to water harvesting areas onsite which would help alleviate offsite flow from the proposed project. Provide written approval from TDOT for the use of the scuppers in the public right-of-way or delineate onsite water harvesting basin depressed 6-inches. 11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development plan document, specifically Sheet C2, to correctly Keynote the riprap and swale in plan view. Currently plan view Keynotes #18 and 19; however per the Keynote legend it appears that #21 and 22 would be more appropriate, revise. 12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development plan document and associated Keynote #21 to label the required minimum filter fabric specifications or reference to PC/COT Standard Specification 1014. The Development Plan Package is to be used as the construction document for site and grading and must accurately label and detail all improvements in plan view and on all associated details for construction purposes. 13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to include the required pedestrian circulation path that must connect the development to the proposed refuse enclosure per TSM Sec.7-01.3.3.B 14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Provide written approval for the proposed refuse collection location. Per TSM Sec.8-01.5.3.G specifically figure 1 this type of collection requires prior approval from ES. Verify that all dimensions are clearly labeled in plan view to meet the minimum standard. Dimension the angle of approach (45degrees per the Fig 1) and the clear 14'x40' approach. 15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Verify with ES that a recycling area for recycling containers is not required under this development. Provide written notification if ES is not requiring this area. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 03/22/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 03/25/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: 1ST ADAMS CONDO HOMES UNITS 1-6 DEVELOPMENT PLAN/TENTATIVE PLAT DP-130027 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the Development Package and Tentative Plat submitted March 14, 2013. TEP has no objections to the plat at this time. TEP will provide an electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat. If you have any questions, please contact me at 917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQW603 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 03/25/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The following development package was reviewed under the Unified Development Code, The Administrative Manual and Technical Manual Sections. 2. A street landscape border is an area running the full length of the street property line bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Refuse storage can not be located within required street landscape borders. DS .7.6.4.2.a. 3. Provide written approval for the location of the proposed refuse collection area per AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T. 4. Provide the subdivision and revenant case numbers in the lower-right corner of each sheet AM 2-06.4.7.A.7. 5. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed 6. Additional comments may apply. |
| 03/25/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#260795 March 26, 2013 Oracle Engineering Group Inc Attn: Peter Salonga 199 E Ft Lowell Rd Tucson, Arizona 85701 Dear Mr. Salonga: SUBJECT: 1st Adams Condo Homes SR13-0027 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 5, 2013. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 03/27/2013 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | PAGE C1 1. There are 2 note 11s inside units 1 and 4 that are incorrectly referenced. Please reconcile. 2. Please add detail numbers to the title blocks of all the details so note 8 will have meaning. 3. Delete note 11 for marked crossings in the public right of way. Reference COT DOT accessible standards. 4. At detail 3, the reference note for accessible parking signage to sheet C2 does not compute. There is no such detail on this sheet. Please provide a large scale accessible parking sign detail and include "Van Accessible" signage. 5. Verify Zoning requirements for a pedestrian way to 1st Av. If required, please insure accessibility. 6. Insure compliance with the Inclusive Home Design Ordinance. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/27/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no concerns with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 03/28/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Susan King GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: 03/28/13 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding DP13-0027/1st Adams Condo Homes * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X____ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " The location map in the upper right hand corner must have the section, township and range. " General notes must have the number of miles of new road, public or private, even if the number is 0. " There must be a section tie labeled, with a bearing and dimension from the section corner or quarter to the point of tie on the subdivision. " All hatching, stippling etc. must be removed in the final plat, unless another agency requires it. If so all lettering must have the hatching, etc. cut away so they are legible. " All adjacent subdivisions should be named, with map and plat in the appropriate areas around the subdivision. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 03/29/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/02/2013 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 04/03/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed. Resubmittal is required. Include the following items: 1) 2 rolled sets of the plans 2) 1 disk containing all items submitted in paper 3) All other items requested by review staff 4) All items approved during the first review. |
| 04/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 04/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See comments in SIRE |
| 04/03/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 04/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 04/03/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |