Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0023
Parcel: 122163210

Address:
3540 E GRANT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0023
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/15/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
02/19/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
02/27/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The following comments are based on the UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE Article 7: Development Standards 7.6 Landscaping and Screening

2. Note: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per UDC D.S. 7.6.2.2.a

3. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

4. Additional comments may apply
02/28/2013 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
03/04/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: March 6, 2013
SUBJECT: The Mint Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Kirke Rice Architect , PLLC Attn: Kirke Rice, RA
LOCATION: 3540 E Grant Road; T14S R14E Sec04
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0023

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/UDC_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Technical_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Admin_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN: Due to the full code expansion requirement per the Zoning Section make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within the UDC, AM and TSM and are reflected on the site plan sheets.

1) AM Sec.2-06.3: Revise the development plan document to remove the Subdivision Coordinator approval block. This is not required to be on a site plan review.

2) AM Sec.2-06.3.5: Revise the development plan document to include the approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0023) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.4: Revise the project location map to meet the minimum requirements within the referenced section; show the property approximately centered within 1 square mile, label sections, township and ranges, section corners, north arrow and scale (3"=1 mile).

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to dimension the existing and future near and far side sight visibility triangles for the two driveway entrances and the existing alley per TSM Sec.10-01.5.3.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.4: Revise the development plan document to label all streets as "Public."

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to verify the required onsite 24-foot wide PAAL that access the existing and proposed parking spaces (or provide a one way design that allows the vehicles to enter or exist onto Tearney Place. Per the UDC Sections 7.4.6.K and 8.7.3.I.2 onsite parking spaces can not be accessed by alleys, revise.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Verify the development plan document is designed in accordance with Sec.7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Specifically a standard parking stall must be 8.5 feet wide by 18-feet long and the proposed bumper blocks must be placed to allow for the 2.5 foot overhang so that the vehicle does not encroach into the required pedestrian access space. Per the proposed document the spaces are only 8 feet 4 inches and the bumper blocks do not provide for the overhang, revise to provide a standard parking space detail meeting these requirements.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise or clarify the refuse container location. The existing container can not block a required parking space as shown on the proposed development plan document. Verify with Environmental Services and provide approval for the existing refuse location and determine if an enclosure is required due to the adjacent residential zoning. If an enclosure is required provide details for construction to meet the minimum specifications within TSM 8-01.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
03/07/2013 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP13-0023
3540 E. Grant Rd.
Development Package

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 03/12/2013

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. AM 2-06.3.5 : Revise the development plan document to include the correct CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

2. AM 2-06.3.7 A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. The location map provided is not legible.

3. AM 2-06.4.1 Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the owner and developer of the site.

4. AM 2-06.4.3 This site has been assigned case number DP13-0023. Place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets.

If a Board of Adjustment variance is granted provide the case number near the lower right corner of all sheets . Provide a general note indicating the BOA variance case number, date of approval, what the variance is for and any conditions of approval.

5. AM 2-06.4.4 The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information.
A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area.
B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property.
C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be
labeled.

6. AM 2-06.4.7.A.2 List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and
acreage.

7. AM 2-06.4.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Remove the reference to the Land Use Code. The use should be as follows: Alcoholic Beverage Service subject to: 4.9.13.P

8. AM 2-06.4.7.A.6 Provide a general note stating that this project has been designed to meet the criteria of the UDC Sec. 5.4 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R).

9. AM 2-06.4.7.A.8.a The indicated gross floor area of the existing building is indicated as 2250 sq. ft. The dimensions provided 22.5 X 90 = 2025 sq. ft. Clarify.

The dimensions of the proposed addition ( 25'-4" X 22'-8") = 574.13 sq. ft. Several notes indicate 562 sq. ft. and 625 sq.ft. Clarify

The width of the addition shown as 25'-4" is indicated as the same width as the existing building dimensioned at 22.5'. Clarify.

Provide dimensions of the outdoor drinking and smoking patio area. If being used to serve alcohol this square footage must be included in all calculations. Expansion, vehicle parking, etc. Provide documentation that this area has been approved by the City of Tucson for use as an outdoor serving of alcohol beverages area or include this area as part of the expansion..

10. AM 2-06.4.7.A.8.c Provide correct expansion calculations for the building and use area. Per UDC 7.4.3.E.2 the existing building area (2025 sq ft x .25 = 506.25 sq. ft allowed increase without full code compliance) with the new addition and the outdoor serving area appears to be greater than 25%, therefore full code compliance for the entire site is required.

11. AM 2-06.4.8.A Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with
distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

12. AM 2-06.4.8.B If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated.

13. AM 2-06.4.9.H.2 If applicable, show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

14. AM 2-06.4.9.H.5 If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of
the UDC. As indicated on the plan the PAAL does not meet this criteria.

Per UDC sec. 7.4.6.K A street of alley may not be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way. As indicated the alley and the street to the south are required to be used to provide maneuverability. Revise.

15. AM 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Per UDC Sec. 7.4.6.B.1.b The off-site parking location has parking in excess of the minimum required parking for its use or can demonstrate alternate hours of operation to the use it serves. The proposed off site parking location does not have excess parking available and unless the bar is only going to operate between the hours of 9 PM and 2:30 AM this will not be allowed.

The parking calculations indicate that 25 parking spaces are being provided off site. The off site plan and agreement indicate 15 parking spaces being provided. Clarify.

There is conflicting information on the square footage of the existing building and the proposed addition as well as the outdoor serving area is missing all of which are required to be part of the calculation for the required vehicle parking. Clarify.

16. The review of this project has been stopped as per discussion with architect and owners with the understanding that this is not a complete review. Additional comments will be forth coming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961
03/12/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied 1. All accessible requirements are to be as per the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC A117.1, 2009 Edition. Please delete all references to ADA and use the accessibility code stated.
2. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking spaces.
a. Show all accessible parking requirements as required by the above stated accessible code such as dimensions, aisles, "Van Accessible" spaces, grade slopes, signage and access to the accessible route.
3. Remove the concrete wheel stop at the accessible aisle.
4. Refer to Zoning comments about the following:
a. Construction material of the pedestrian walk way (accessible route).
b. Location of concrete wheel stops
5. Extend the accessible route to the Grant Road right of way.
6. Provide a large scale accessible parking sign and include a "Van Accessible" sign.
7. Insure the accessible route grade slopes are as required by ICC A117.1, Section 403.3.
END OF REVIEW
03/14/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location of local fire hydrants and the size of public water lines.
b. The size of the public sanitary sewers and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
d. Any existing or proposed utility easements
e. The first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/17/2014 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed