Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP13-0007
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/22/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera for Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP13-0007 728 W. Ajo Way Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: 02/22/13 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project is being reviewed under the Unified Development Code (UDC) which includes the Administrative Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). 2. The perimeter distance and bearing for the new west property lines must be labeled on the plans. The Curve data for C-2 on sheet A0.1 has been labeled as one distance. Because the curve is actually two separate sections the distance and bearing must be labeled based on the actual curve data for each section. Revise all applicable sheets. Previous Comment #8 - AM 2-06.4.8.A Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. Include for both lots 3. It does not appear that the easements have not been drawn and labeled or keyed on the plans sheet A0.1. Draw, label with the recordation info and Key the easement per schedule "B" Items on sheet A0.1 Previous Comment #9 - AM 2-06.4.8.B, All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 4. The development package must be revised to address the zoning comments. The remaining zoning comments are minor and can be reviewed over the counter with an appointment if the applicant wishes to do so. Call in advance to set up an appointment. As of this development package review, the Final Plat has not been approved, but zoning can stamp and approve the development package but will place a hold on issuance of any permits or releasing the development package until the final plat is approved and if applicable until after the 30 waiting period after Mayor and Council approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\DP13-00072nd review.doc |
| 02/28/2013 | RONALD BROWN | HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS ARE PRESENTED IN ALL CAPS 1. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking design layout showing all the accessible requirements including dimensions, signage, grade slopes, markings, access to accessible route, van accessible space, ramps, and aisles. OK a. Insure both sheets A0.1 and C-1 reflect the same design layout. NON-RESPONSIVE - SHEET C-1 IS NOT THE SAME LAYOUT AS A0.1. PLEASE RECONCILE b. Provide a large scale sign including van accessible signage. AS PER COT DOT STANDARDS, THE BOTTOM OF THE MAIN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN IS TO BE 7'-0" A.F.G. PLEASE CHANGE NOTE 1, DETAIL 2, TO REFLECT THIS REQUIREMENT. c. Provide a large scale detail of the ramp showing compliance with the 2009 ICC A117.1, Sections 405 and/or 406 which ever is most apropriate. c.1 AT DETAIL 3, THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IN FRONT OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES IS NOT A HAZARDOUS AREA AND THEREFORE DOES NOT REQUIRED DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE RAMP. c.2 THE SLOPE FOR THE FLARED SIDES OF A RAMP IS TO BE A MAXIMUM OF 10% AS PER ICC A117.1, SECTION 406.7. PLEASE INDICATE SUCH. 2. The most Southerly accessible parking space has been short changed and pushed into the PAAL. Please reconcile and make compliant. OK ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 3. The minimum actual size of letting for all drawings is 3/32" both upper and lower case. Please rework the non-compliant lettering on Sheet A0.1 and resubmit. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/04/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/05/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved |