Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP13-0004
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/17/2013 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/31/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: February 11, 2013 SUBJECT: America's Best Self Storage Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Perry Engineering, Attn: Ken Perry, PE LOCATION: 7475 S Old Vail Rd; T15S R14E Sec21 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP13-0004 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Report (Patterson Hydrology, 08JAN13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/UDC_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Technical_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf; http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Admin_Manual_ADOPTED_100912.pdf The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0004) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.4: Revise the development plan document to label Old Vail Road as "Public." 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to clearly label the required separation of the proposed vehicular use area where Keynoted by Keynote #1. Refer to LUC 3.3.6.8; A barrier, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Revise Detail D/4 to show the required separation. 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to revise Keynote #13 to correctly label the Sheet that the detail is found on. 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise General Construction Note #22 on Sheet C4 to remove the reference to the UBC and replace it with the following "Work is to be in conformance with City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual Sec.2-01 (excavation and grading requirements)." 6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.1: Revise the development plan documents to include the 100-yr ponding depth for the retention basin as shown in Detail A/3 and on Sheet C3. Provide the ponding depth on the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Sheet C5) where indicated by "Max Depth=X" 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development plan documents to correctly reference the Sheet that the details on Sheet C3 reference. Per the cross section A and B it references Sheet 4, but should reference Sheet C3 (A/C3 and B/C3). GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 8) TSM Sec.4-03: Provide a Geotechnical Report evaluation that addresses the following: a) Provide percolation rates for the retention basin for 5-year threshold to show that the drain down time meets the maximum allowed per DS Sec.4-03.3.5.1.3.a. b) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for the proposed constructed slopes and vertical concrete barrier that are proposed. SWPPP: 9) Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of the Permit Part VIII.J. Provide the signature of the owner of the property under the certification section of the report. (To save paper the certification paragraph can be submitted and placed within the already received SWPPP Report so that the applicant does not have to print out a complete new set) GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Geotechnical Report and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 02/06/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/11/2013 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP13-0004 7475 S. Old Vail Road Development Package TRANSMITTAL: 02/13/2013 DUE DATE: 2/14/2012 COMMENTS: 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is 1/14/2014. 2. AM 2-06.4.2.D The administrative address provided near the lower right corner of sheets 1-8 thru 5-8 is not correct. The correct address is 7475 S. Old Vail Rd. Revise. 3. AM 2-06.4.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The proposed use should be as follows: "Personal Storage subject to: Sec. 4.9.10.C.3 & .6 and 4.9.13.Q." Clearly indicate on the plans compliance with UDC Sec. 4.9.10.C.3 & .6. 4. AM 2-06.4.2.A.6 This project is not subject the Scenic Corridor Overlay. Remove general note 4, the second number 4 note. Provide a note on the plans indicating that this project has been designed to meet the criteria of the Major Streets and Routes Overlay Zone per UDC Sec. 5.4. This project is subject to The Airport Environs Overlay Zone. Provide a note on the plans indicating that this project has been designed to meet UDC Sec. 5.6.1 criteria. This project is within the AEZ Noise Control District for DMAFB environs zone per UDC Sec. 5.6.9 NCD-A - 65-70 Ldn. Provide a note on the plans stating such. This project is within the AEZ Approach Corridors for DMAFB environs zone per UDC Sec. 5.6.8.B ADC-2. Provide a note on the plans stating such. Per UDC Sec. 5.6.8.B.1.c The maximum allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is 0.30. Provide the allowed and proposed FAR on the plans. 5. AM 2-06.4.3 This project has been assigned case number DP13-0004. Place this case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. Place the previous development plan (D08-0021) and lot split (S08-097)-case numbers near the lower right corner of all sheets 6. AM 2-06.4.7.A.8.d This project does not appear to being phased. Phasing is when one portion the project will be completed prior to starting another section. As this does not appear to be the case remove the phase lines and notes. For clarity purposes remove the boundary of proposed improvements lines in order to clearly indicate the property lines, existing fences, dimension lines, etc. 7. AM 2-06.4.7.A.8.a Clearly indicate that the existing covered parking structure will require a building permit. Unless it has already been permitted, if so, provide documentation of permits being applied for and approved. 8. AM 2-06.4.7.A.8.c Provide expansion calculations for the storage use area. Note: If the expansion is greater than 25% then full code compliance is required for the entire site. 9. AM 2-06.04.8.A.8.d When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 10. AM 2-06.4.9.H.5.a Per UDC Sec. 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Required along the thicken edge of pavement per keynote number1. Clearly indicate the location of barriers. If using wheel stops clearly indicate the minimum spacing of 5' between wheel stops. 11. AM 2-06.4.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 12. AM 2-06.4.9.O Per UDC Sec. 6.3.4 Table 6.3-5.A The required building setback for a nonresidential use adjacent to a residential zone in theI-1 zone is 1½ times the height of the wall of the structure. If the building height is 16' the required setback is 24' from the north property line for the canopy cover. The plan indicates a setback of 22.8'. Revise. For your information the building overhang is allowed to encroach into the required setback 2'. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\DP13-0004dp.doc |
| 02/12/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/13/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/13/2013 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/14/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to provide the appropriate screening for outdoor storage adjacent to residential zoning per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 6' high wall. 2) Refer to Zoning comment regarding expansion calculations. Refer to LUC 3.7.2-I for LUC applicability. Revise as necessary. 3) The wall proposed along Old Vail road may not obstruct visibility of the street landscape border per LUC 3.7.3.2.B 4) The construction for wall proposed along Old Vail Road may not impact any existing protected native plants. Provide revised NPPO or landscape plans as necessary to document any changes to plant material or grading limits. |
| 02/14/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/05/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/05/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |