Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0218
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/30/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/05/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Legacy Business Park Lot 21 Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0218 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 5, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed for full code compliance with the Land Use Code and Development Standards for the area of expansion only. 2. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan with your next submittal. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on all sheets, DP12-0218, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The proposed canopy addition is located over a "10' easement for communications Dkt. 6224 Pg. 742. This easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package or a letter from all communication companies that have claims to this easement will need to be provided stating that they have no objection to the canopy being located within there easement. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.c Until the last approved site plan is provided the loading requirements cannot be verified. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.d As you have elected to use the new vehicle parking space calculation you are required to use the new bicycle parking, Provide a Long & Short Term bicycle parking spaces calculation on the plan. This calculation should address the number required and number provided. If any new Short or Long term bicycle parking is required provide the location on the plan and provide a detail. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The street perimeter yard setback (West) requirement shown on sheet 1 is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.A Within established areas, the front street perimeter yard is twenty (20) feet or one and one-half (1 1/2) the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0195 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & Last approved site plan. |
| 12/19/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/19/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/26/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/26/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Provide clearance from easement holder for construction within the easement. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/25/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 01/03/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |