Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0216
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/20/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/28/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Argus Machine Inc. - Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0216 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 29, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This project was reviewed for full code compliance with the Land Use Code and Development Standards due to a 29% building expansion. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0216, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said provide the subject to sections "SEC. 3.5.5.1.B, .F, .G, AND .H" to General Note 2. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. That said there is a 10' PUE Per Book 46 Page 92 that runs along the north end of the parcel that needs to be shown on the plan. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.a Provide a parking space depth dimension for the vehicle parking spaces shown north of the existing rolling gate. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.a The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4.2 INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP, 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA. Revise the vehicle parking space calculation to show the correct number of required spaces, six (6). 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.a As one (1) of the required vehicle parking spaces is proposed within the gated area provide a note on the plan stating that the northern most gate is to remain open during business hours. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.c The loading space calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.4.5 INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP, Less than 25,000 sq. ft. GFA, ZERO (0) loading spaces are required. Revise the loading space calculation to show the correct number of required loading spaces, ZERO (0). 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.d Remove all references to "CLASS 1 & 2" bicycle parking from the plan as it is no longer applicable. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.d The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP, Zero (0) Short-term and two (2) Long-term bicycle parking spaces are required. Revise the bicycle parking space calculation. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.d Provide a detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 and 3.3.9.4 are met for the required Long-term bicycle parking. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The building setbacks shown under General Note 4 are not correct. Street perimeter yard are based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.A and interior perimeter yard is based on perimeter yard indicator DD and LUC Section 3.2.6.4. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks on site. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0216 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 12/07/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | This project is to be under full code compliance as determined by the zoning reviewer. SHEET 2 1. Please provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, signage, grade slopes, and identify the "van accessible" configuration. 2. Provide a large scale sign detail including the "van accessible" sign. 3. Please indicate the new painted marklings for the accessible parking aisle and marked crossing. a. Please include detectable warnings at both ends of the marked crossing as required by ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14. 4. The configuration of the existing curb ramp shown on the drawings is not code compliant. Please provide a new curb ramp as per section 405. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/07/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/13/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to address comments from other agencies. 2) Note the height and type of existing screening along the southern property boundary. 3) Provide an irrigation plan for any new plantings. |
| 12/17/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/17/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add a note indicating the project site is within FEMA Zone X-shaded and that a Floodplain Use Permit is required. 2. Show location of solid waste container storage and servicing. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 12/18/2012 | CPIERCE1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |