Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0210
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2013 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/12/2013 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | See comments from first review. The note requested by RWRD has not been added to the plan set. |
| 02/14/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Environmental Services approves this project for solid waste and recycle storage and service. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 02/25/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP12-0210 Building Addition - Medical Service Outpatient Use Development Package - Site Plan Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 26, 2013 DUE DATE: March 13, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Comments are in "quotation marks" and the development standard is written below the review comment. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 16, 2013. 2. I could only verify that 110 parking spaces have been drawn on the plan. A variance would be required if the number of required spaces cannot be provided or add an additional parking space. Also after reviewing the calculations listed for the building square footage, it was noted that the wrong overall square footage has been listed. The overall square footage is 22,189 and is listed on the plans as 21,389. Correct the square footage and revise the FAR if needed. A Portion of previous Comment 11: DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a - "LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B. Setbacks from Access Lanes and PAALs. "I could only verify that 107 parking spaces have been provided on the site. The parking calculations indicate that 108 spaces required and provided. Verify that 108 parking spaces have been provided." 3. The Phase two (2) addition square footage listed on the cover sheet and building footprint does not match the square footage when multiplying the dimensions labeled on the addition footprint. Revise the data to match one or the other, adjust the FAR, and revise the vehicle and bicycle parking as needed based on the revisions made. Previous comment 14: DS 2-01.3.9.K - "Dimension the length and widths of the new buildings in order to verify the proposed square footages." Identify and provide dimensions, approximate areas in square footage, and purposes of any lots proposed for dedication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, or natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, or school sites). 3. Add the DP signature stamp on all the plans sheets. The digital stamp can be found at the following web link http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp The files are in a jpg, PDF, and dwg format which ever your cad program can use. 4. The zoning comments are minor and can be reviewed over the counter with an appointment and if all reviewers have approved the DP. Ensure that all changes that are made to the site plan are made to the landscape / irrigation plan sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\DP12-0210dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 03/04/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape approval. |
| 03/08/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 1 1. Revise note 11 to read "per 2012 IBC, Chapter 11, Table 1106.1. 2. Revise note 11.3 to read "2% maximum in all directions as per ICC A117.1, Section 502.5". 3. After deletion of the two accessible parking spaces East of building 1, there are only 7 accessible parking spaces provided. Please revise your parking analysis to 7 accessible parking spaces. SHEET 3 4. Delete note 14, it is not used. 5. Change note 25 to read "per 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 406.12, 13 and 14". 6. Indicate a flush condition from the accessible passenger loading zone to the sidewalk. SHEET 4 7. Indicate a flush condition from the accessible parking aisle to the sidewalk at detail "H". END OF REVIEW |
| 03/12/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed. Resubmittal is required. Please include the following: two sets of the rolled plans a disk containing all items submitted all other items requested by review staff |
| 03/12/2013 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 721-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, BY M.NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0210/7140 E ROSEWOOD ST/DEVELOPMENT PLAN- 2nd Review DATE: MARCH 11, 2013 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. REMOVE: Map 39, Plat 36 and Gateway Center Subdivision from "LEGAL DESCRIPTION" (only reference should be to Map 41, Pg 72) 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |