Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0210
Parcel: 133231910

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP12-0210
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/16/2012 CAGUILA1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
11/16/2012 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
11/20/2012 PGEHLEN1 ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied The refuse container location is accessible. However, there are no details showing enclosure size, gate, etc and recycle is not addressed.

Environmental Services does not approve project.




Jeff Drumm, P.E.
Environmental Manager
City of Tucson Environmental Services
520-837-3713
11/23/2012 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Passed Defer to Rezoning.
12/03/2012 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP12-0210
Building Addition - Medical Service Outpatient Use
Development Package - Site Plan Review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 3, 2012

DUE DATE: December 13, 2012

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
Comments are in "quotation marks" and the development standard is written below the review comment.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 16, 2013.

2. DS 2-01.3.1 - "List the email addresses as per this standard."

The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

3. DS 2-01.3.2.A - "It is not clear in the title block what the project is for. List the name of the Medical Service that will use the new building. If the name of the business or use is as noted in the title bock, disregard this comment."

The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name.

4. DS 2-01.3.2.E - "In the title block, list along with the page number the total number of pages for this project, i.e. 1 of 12, 2 of 12 etc."

E. Page number and number of pages.

5. DS 2-01.3.3 - "This project has been assigned the Development Package case number DP12-0210. List the case number next to the title block on all plan sheets."

Relevant case numbers (development package document, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.), shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

6. DS 2-01.3.4 - "Draw and label the Pantano Wash on the location map."

The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information.


7. DS2-01.3.7.9.a, .b, .c, .d and DS2-01.3.9.H.6 - "Per the information related to building (area listed by phase) that is listed on the cover sheet, this project appears to be proposed as a phased development. If this is the case revise the zoning information data to reflect the actual phasing. The calculations shall include the vehicle and bicycle parking, Loading zones if applicable, overall GFA, Floor Area ratio, coverage if applicable."

.a - Floor area for each building,

DS2-01.3.7.9.b - "List the coverage based on the allowance by the PAD Criteria."

.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage,

DS2-01.3.7.9.c - "List the building expansion calculations based on the Phase I and Phase II"

.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included.

DS2-01.3.7.9.d - "List the phasing calculations"

.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access and incorporation of future phases into this project are required.

8. DS2-01.3.8.A - "The site boundary information for the radius at the northwest corner is labeled on the development/site plan but the arrow is not pointing to the boundary radius. Revise the arrow to correctly point tot eh radius location."

Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

9. DS2-01.3.8.C - "Draw and label the Kolb Road future curb location and dimension the building setback from the back of the future back of curb location. The typical curb to property line dimension for a 150-foot r/w cross section is 12 feet. Check with PDSD Engineering for cross section dimensions information."

The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

10. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2. - "Draw and label the future sight visibility triangles based on the future curb location."

Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a - "LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B. Setbacks from Access Lanes and PAALs.
1. Access lanes and PAALs shall be setback at least one (1) foot from:
a. An open structure, such as a carport or covered pedestrian access path as measured from the closest part of the structure or roof overhang. After reviewing the PAAL dimensions and reviewing for the setbacks from a PAAL and an open structure it does not appear that the structures depicted on the plan meet this requirement. The PAAL is defined as the area between the ends of the parking spaces (see LUC figure 3.3.6.4.A.I), In other words for this design the carport structure is overhanging the PAAL." (Options, reduce the structures to meet the criteria regardless of the PAAL width or length the parking spaces with dimensions and as long as a minimum PAAL width of 24 feet is provided and the structure is setback one (1) foot from the PAAL this should comply with the setback requirement. Call me if you have any questions regarding this specific comment.) The same criteria need to be met for all proposed carport structures."

"I could only verify that 107 parking spaces have been provided on the site. The parking calculations indicate that 108 spaces required and provided. Verify that 108 parking spaces have been provided."

"The development plan and landscape plan do not match with regards to the parking layout. Per the landscape plan along the east side of the existing building one of the parking spaces has been crosshatched as if this space is to be a ramp or not available, clarify what if this is just a drafting error or is the space to be eliminated. Along the west side of the site just north of the new building there appears tot be a parking spaces which is proposed at least on the landscape plan but not on the development plan sheet. However this space would not work and should be removed. Revise the landscape plan sheet to match the development plan sheet. All handicapped parking spaces must be drawn and noted on the plan sheets to match the development plan sheet."

"Because this is a greater than 25% expansion in building area full code compliance is required. All accessible ramps must be rebuilt to comply with current COT standards."

If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. a. Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided fully dimensioned.
As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are formerly located in Development Standard 3- 05.0 now in the Land Use Code Section 3.3.6.

12. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c - "While the Land Use Code does not specifically require loading zones to be provided for this use, the calculations on the cover sheet plan does indicate that two (2) loading spaces have been provided. Only one of the loading zones could be verified by annotation on the development plan sheet. There is a symbol that resembles a loading zone drawn in the drop off area of the existing building but it is not annotated as a loading zone. If a second loading is proposed annotate the location and size.

Show all loading zones, and vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, and the design vehicle.

13. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d - "As mentioned in a previous comment this site is subject to full code compliance due to a greater than 25% building expansion. The bicycle parking requirements have been updated and must be shown on the plan to meet current code requirements for design and location. Short term bicycle parking must be within 50 feet of a main public entrance. Dimension the distance from the farthest short term bicycle parking proposed along the south side of the existing building. In addition the long and short term bicycle parking facilities in this location are up against the loading zone location. The loading area while it probably does not get utilized as it should or very often would create a problem for access to the lockers or racks if a vehicle were to be parked in the loading zone. Relocate the facilities away from the loading zone to a location where access is clearly provided and away from the back of the loading zone and physically separated form any vehicular use areas. Review LUC section 3.3.9 Bicycle Parking Design Criteria for more information."

Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations for Class I and Class II bicycle spaces required and provided.

14. DS 2-01.3.9.K - "Dimension the length and widths of the new buildings in order to verify the proposed square footages."

Identify and provide dimensions, approximate areas in square footage, and purposes of any lots proposed for dedication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, or natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, or school sites).

15. DS2-01.3.9.O - "Provide an overall dimension from the West wall of the new building to the future back of curb location. Label the height of the carport structures.

All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

16. DS 2-01.3.9.S - "The sidewalk along the east side entrance that is within the landscape island has been drawn with truncated domes. But it does not continue or connect to a sidewalk. Based on the plan it appears that cross walks must be provided in order to demonstrate a continuous pedestrian circulation at this location.

DS 2-08.4.1.A - "A sidewalk connection to the Kolb Road sidewalk must be provided from the new sidewalk in front of the new building."

Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and the design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0.

16. DS 2-01.3.9.W - "The proposed new sign at the west entrance is encroaching into the sight visibility triangle. Relocate the sign out of the triangle."

Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26 may be required.

17. "Review the Data related to Development Area1 in the PAD 3 document and add the relevant information to the plan as notes where applicable or demonstrate compliance. If you have any questions related to this comment give me a call."

18. "Additional comments may be forthcoming based on changes to the plan and responses to the zoning comments."

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\DP12-0210dp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents.
12/06/2012 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied SHEET 3
1. At the location of the three modified existing accessible parking spaces:
a. Note 1 is not applicable. All accessible spaces are to have code compliant ramps as per ICC A117.1, Section 405 or 406 which ever is most Applica able.
2. At the 2 new accessible parking spaces east of building 1:
a. The curb ramp shown is non compliant. Provide a new curb ramp compliant with ICC A117.1, Section 405 or 406 which ever is most Applica able.
b. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking design layout showing all accessible requirements i.e. dimensions, grade slopes, markings, curb ramp or sidewalk ramp access to accessible route and signage.
3. For the two accessible parking spaces at the NE corner of Building 1:
a. Provide a compliant curb ramp as required by ICC A117.1, Sections 405 and/or 406 which ever is most applicable.
4. Show an accessible loading zone at the front entrance loading zone of building 1 as required by the 2006 IBC, Section 1106.7 and ICC A117.1, Section 503.
5. For the east and west drive entrances show large scale details of both marked crossings showing all accessible requirements i.e.: dimensions, marked crossings, curb ramps, grade slopes and detectable warnings.
6. For the accessible route connection from the NE corner of building 1 to Rosewood Street, provide the following:
a. Two marked crossings to the end parking island.
b. Show all exiting ramps in a large scale detail. If they are non-compliant, show modifications for compliance.
c. Show detectable warnings at both ends of each marked crossings as per ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13, and/or 14 as applicable.
d. Show all dimensions.
7. For the accessible connection from the Phase 2 building to Rosewood Street:
a. Show a sidewalk ramp for the 2 new accessible parking spaces or denote a flush condition for access to the accessible route.
b. Relocate the detectable warning at the bottom of the aisle to the landing of the concrete ramp or sidewalk.
c. Show 2 ramps at the sidewalk connection from the PAAL to the east corner of the entrance drive.
SHEET 4
8. At detail A, Accessible Parking Space:
a. Generic details are not acceptable. Please provide large scale details of all the different accessible parking design configurations depicted on the site plan. Include all accessible requirements such as dimensions, grade slopes, markings, signage, and sidewalk or curb ramps for access to the accessible route.
END OF REVIEW
12/11/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
12/13/2012 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
12/13/2012 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved exception
12/13/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/13/2012 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Revise the plans as requested by other agencies.
12/14/2012 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond WWM did not require review of plans. They want one note added to plan. It can be located on the WWM form.
12/17/2012 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied AUDREY FARENGA
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 740-6800
FAX #: 623-5411


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW
SUBJECT: DP12-0210 7140 E ROSEWOOD ST/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: December 14, 2012



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1. Include the book and page for the subdivision in the Legal Description Box.
12/20/2012 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR#256935 December 19, 2012

Alleva Design Studio Architect
2222 E 3rd Street
Tucson, Arizona 85719

Dear Alleva Design Studio Architect:

SUBJECT: 7140 E Rosewood Street
DP12-0210

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 16, 2012. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Charles Leon at (520) 917-8707.

Sincerely,


Elizabeth Miranda
Office Support Specialist
Design/Build
lm
Enclosures
cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email)
C. Leon, Tucson Electric Power
12/20/2012 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been compeleted. Revisions required.

Two rolled plans, a disk, and any other documents required by the review are required for the resubmittal.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/12/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed