Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0208
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11/13/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
11/21/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
11/26/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
12/06/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please identify the covered accessible parking spaces. END OF REVIEW |
12/11/2012 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Delineate EHS and 100-year floodplain limits on site plan and provide civil engineer's seal on the site plan sheet for this data. (DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.8) |
12/12/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a native plant prservation plan or application for exception. |
12/12/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The proposed project is in proximity to the proposed Pantano River Park. Please refer to the Pima Regional Trails System Master Plan and the excerpts below for pertinent standards that may be applicable. Corridor Width. The minimum corridor width for River Parks is 100 feet on both river banks. However, additional space is recommended wherever possible to help enhance the quality and impact of the river park system, reduce the urban heat island effect, and allow for the restoration of the wildlife habit that once existed along the edges of the community's major watercourses. Encroachment. New development shall not encroach into River Park corridors. Provide labels for the future river park and include dimensions of any areas reserved. |
12/12/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a detail showing the minimum clearance that will be afforded from underground utilities (e.g. sewers and natural gas pipes) to the footings for the canopies. The clearance shall allow sufficient room for safe excavation and repair of the underground utilities without disturbing the footings. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
12/21/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |