Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0206
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/11/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/11/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/11/2013 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 04/08/2013, SUBJECT: CAID Industries DP12-0206, T15S, R14E, SECTION 08 RECEIVED: Development Package on March 13, 2013 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The Drainage Report and Development Package are recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/11/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Caid Industries - Site Expansion Development Package (2nd Review) DP12-0206 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 19, 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. This comment was not addressed. The west end of the perpendicular vehicle parking spaces, the two angled vehicle parking spaces and the access lane connecting the proposed parking to the existing parking require some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing the unpaved areas. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H Per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said provide some type of barrier at the west end of the proposed parking. 2. Once the above comment has been addressed Zoning is willing to provide and over the counter review. Please call or email to schedule this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0206 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 04/11/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP12-0206 CAID Industries 4/11/13 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: Concurrent Review - see C9-12-16 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan and the General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/10/12 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (X) Denied. See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other Staff offers the following comments: 1. Provide Detail showing that7-foot wall meets rezoning Condition 9. Keynote 15 (Sheet C2.0 and C2.1) should refer to Wall Detail. 2. Call out Landscaping Rezoning conditions: 8, 12, 13 on Landscape Sheet L1.0. REVIEWER:JB 837-6966 |
| 04/11/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Include with re-submittal Re-zoning approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the landscape plan, date of approval, and any landscape conditions imposed. Provide written verification that all conditions of re-zoning have been met. Provide Environmental Resource Report with next submittal for review and approval. |
| 04/12/2013 | MICHAEL WYNEKEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please provide the following items. 1) A disk containing all plans and all documents submitted. 2) Two (2) sets of rolled plans. 3) All items requested by the reviewers. 4) All approved items. |
| 04/12/2013 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | I have reviewed the above noted Development Plan and have the following comments concerning the trees to be planted in the ROW: 1. The City has an existing planting and irrigation system in this area. 2. How will these trees be irrigated long term. 3. Who will maintain them long term. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |