Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0202
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/01/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/02/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/20/2012 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0202 DOLLAR GENERAL PANTANO/ESCALANTE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 19, 2012 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Include a brief legal description on all title blocks. |
| 11/26/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 3 1. Extend the concrete accessible route to the existing Patano Road concrete pedestrian way. SHEET 4 2. At detail 4: Provide for 2% maximum slope in all directions for all areas of the accessible parking and aisles. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/27/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP12-0202 Dollar General - Pantano / Escalante Rd. Retail Trade Use Group - General Merchandise TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 28, 2012 DUE DATE: December 03, 2012 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 01. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 10, 2013. 02. DS 2-01.2.7 - The contour interval should be listed under the north arrow of all plan sheets or site and grading plan sheets. 03. DS 2-01.3.0 3.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 04. DS 2-01.3.2. B. - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. Include in the title block or add to the S.T.R. the "SW qtr of the SW qtr of section 28 T14S R15E" 05. DS 2-01.3.2.D - The title block shall include the following information, the site's administrative street address. 06. DS2-01.3.3 If applicable, list any relevant case numbers (development package document, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 07. DS2-01.3.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. Correct the subject to section to sate 3.5.9.2.C, and add the General Restrictions Section 2.5.3.6.A and .B 08. DS2-01.3.7.A.9.a - The floor area ratio has been listed incorrectly as .90, revise the floor area ratio to .35 as allowed by development designator "28". 09. DS2-01.3.8.B - If applicable to this project, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 10. DS2-01.3.9.F. All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two (2) or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. Label on the site plan, the zoning classifications adjacent to the property including across the streets. DS2-01.3.9L. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 11. DS2-01.3.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. The existing SVTs have been drawn based on the existing conditions. The future SVTs must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned based on the future curb location. 12. DS2-01.3.9.H.5.a - Draw and label the vehicle overhang for the parking spaces adjacent to the sidewalk. The maximum overhang is 2.5 feet. Provide a dimensioned detail drawing with wheel stops if they are to be provided for any of the parking spaces. Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. 13. DS2-01.3.9.H.5.d. -The long term bicycle parking facilities could not be verified on the plan. Draw. Label and dimension the long term facility on the plan. A minimum of two spaces are required for this use. If the long term facility is to be provided within the building provided a detail drawing of the proposed location. The detail drawing should demonstrate compliance with security and design criteria as listed in LUC section 3.3.9. Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations for Class I and Class II bicycle spaces required and provided. 14. DS2-01.3.9.M - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The DSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. The grading plan has been reviewed by zoning for compliance with the site plan. Once the site plan is approved the grading plan is also approved. For consistency ensure that any changes that are made to the site plan are made to the grading and landscape plans. 15. DS2-01.3.9.Q. Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 16. DS2-01.3.9.R and .T Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and the design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. If the street sidewalk is required to be constructed along the Escalante Road frontage the onsite sidewalk along the onsite sidewalk along the east boundary of the site must connect to the Street sidewalk. Revise the plan as required. (Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0.) 17. DS2-01.3.9. W - At this time it is not clear whether or not the signs may be within the future SVTs as the Future SVTs have not been drawn on the site plan. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26 may be required. 18. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on changes to the site plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\Dp12-0202dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan, and requested documents |
| 11/29/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/04/2012 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Fire hydrants shall be added to meet the 2006 IFC local amendments that an approved fire hydrant shall be within 300 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the structure. Please indicate the location of the proposed fire hydrant to meet this requirement. |
| 12/04/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: JAS Engineering DATE: December 4, 2012 PO Box 1888 Tucson, Arizona 85702 Subject: Dollar General Store, 3751 S. Pantano Rd. Development Package, DP12-0202 (First Review) T-14-S, R-15-E, Section 28 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package and Hydrology Report. The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Access to property shall be no closer than 200' of intersection centerline for an Arterial Street. Or obtain permission from TDOT for access closer than 200'. 3. Complete the dev. plan no. an all sheets, typ. D12-0202. 4. Call out all details referencing the City of Tucson Standard Details if applicable. 5. The title block shall include the following information. D.S. 2-01.3.2. B. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. D. The administrative street address. 6. Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. D.S. 2-01.3.9. 2. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. Show the exist. SVT's at the intersection also. J. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) Show the future SVT's. The future curb location for a 150' R/W is 12' from the property line. L. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. See Hydrology Report comments N. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared inaccordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 1. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. 7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or onsite runoff discharge points. 22. Include a compact disk (CD) containing the latest/revised submittal of the dev. plan, reports and documents associated with this project with the latest submittal. 23. It is suggested that while my comments are being addressed or have been addressed, that you make an appointment/call/email me to discuss any of my comments that you may have questions on. If I missed any information or made a mistake, we can go over those items at the meeting, over the phone or through email. Do not hesitate to call if there are any questions or disagreements on my comments as you address them. Hydrology Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the HR. 2. A portion of the NW ret./det. basin cannot be located in the exist. ing./egr. and utility easement. Incorporate the removed amount of stormwater into the remaining basins in order to maintain the quantity of water needed to be detained. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: 1. The SWPPP has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3751 S. Pantano Rd._DP-SITE_Plan |
| 12/04/2012 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed. Resubmittal is required. |
| 12/04/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Landscape additions or modifications proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 2) Revise the title of sheet 5. It is titled landscape and irrigation plan and also hydrology and utility plan. 3) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. The planter located immediately west of the building does not appear to meet the standard. 4) Fencing shall be required during construction for all undisturbed natural desert areas of Protected Native Plants and for individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. The area to be fenced shall be beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A Revise the plans as necessary. 5) Check the ratio for catchment areas to canopy areas on sheet 9. The values appear to be understated. DS 10-03.5 |
| 12/04/2012 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 9, 2012 To: Mr. Jeffrey A. Stanley, P.E. JAS Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Francisco Galindo, P.E., Development Liaison Unit Engineer (740-6733) Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: Dollar General at Pantano Rd. and Escalante Rd. Development Plan - 1st Submittal S12-910 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. The existing Utility Easement shall be dedicated as a Public Sewer Easement. 2. Show all proposed BCS lines labeled with the letters BCS and identify them as "Private". Ref. A, IV.J.1.w 3. Add the following notes: "No permits shall be issued for any permanent structures to be built within the public sewer easements shown hereon without separate written authorization from the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department". Ref. A, IV.J.3.c.1. "All landscaping within the public sewer easement shown hereon shall be in accordance with the planting guidelines contained within Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Detail WWM A-4". Ref. A, IV.J.3.d.1. 4. Obtain a Type II Capacity Letter from the PCRWRD's Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Ref. A Dollar General at Pantano Rd. and Escalante Rd. 1st Submittal; S12-910 5. The proposed sewer is inside a Common Area. Sewers shall be avoided between lots, along washes, in wash environments, outside of right-of-ways, and in Common Areas. 6. Easement shall be dedicated as Public Sewer Easement. 7. Show concrete spillway and walls on both sides of easement. 8. Show right-of-way and street improvements for Jennifer Anne Dr. 9. Relocate Manhole No. 2 to a location where it is not impacted by storm water runoff. 10. Consider connecting the new sewer to the existing manhole IMS 8195-08 located in Jennifer Anne Dr. cul-de-sac, west of Pantano Rd. or to the existing manhole IMS 4117-07. New sewers shall be within public right-of-ways. 11. Show the proposed sewer main with a thicker line so that it is easily differentiated from the existing sewer. 12. Show the proposed sewer in its entirety with no break lines. This office will require a revised set of prints and a response letter addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of prints and response letter. cc: Kristin Greene, P.E. Chad Amateau, PE Tom Porter DLU Project folder Ref. A - Development Plan Checklist Requirements - Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. B - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. C - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. D - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. E - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. F - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. G - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ Ref. H - Public Sewer Improvement Plan Review Checklist http://www.pimaxpress.com/Dev_Review/PDFs/Public%20Sewer%20IP%20Review%20Checklist%2007.2008.pdf |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |