Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0201
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/08/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: No Anchovies Pizza - Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0201 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 9, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The provided last approved plan is for a tenant improvement not a site review. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan that shows the north patio. That said this plan is reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site due to a use expansion of greater than 25%. This project requires historic review prior to approval of the development package. Contact Michael Taku @837-4963 or email Michael.Taku@tucsonaz.gov for information concerning the historic review. As you have elected to use the Main Gate Urban Overlay District (UOD) review by the City's Design Professional will be required prior to approval of this development package. Contact Adam Smith @837-6951 or email Adam.Smith@tucsonaz.gov for information concerning this review. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the page number and number of pages, "X of 5", etc. within the title block on all sheets. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0201, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.4 The location map does not meet the minimum scale of 3'=1mile. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 General Note A.2 does not appear to list the correct gross area of the site. Based on the dimensions provided on the plan 50 x 177.60 = 8,880 sq. ft.. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 General Note A.3 Lists the use as Auto Sales and Repair. Based on the UOD this should be listed as "FOOD SERVICE". 7. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H 5 Per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said provide some type of barrier along the west side of the vehicle use area. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H 5 Per Main Gate UOD Section C-5.e.1 provide the required five (5) foot setback along the west side of the vehicle use area. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H 5.a Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. This detail should provide the location dimension for the wheel stops, see LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C. 13. The required vehicle parking spaces cannot be verified until comment 17 is addressed. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H 5.d "SITE PLAN KEYNOTE #8" calls out 'EXISTING BICYCLE PARKING TO REMAIN" and under CODE TABULATIONS:, EXIST. BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED" 10 spaces are provided. Zoning was not able to find the 10 spaces on the plan. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H 5.d As this is a full code site review, show the location of the Short-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 & 3.3.9.3 are met. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H 5.d Per Main Gate UOD Section C-5.b.2.ii two (2) Long term bicycle parking spaces are required. Revised the bicycle parking calculation, show the location of the Long-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 & 3.3.9.4 are met. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q There is a difference between the square footage shown within the building foot print and the square footage shown under "CODE TABULATIONS:, BUILDING AREA CALCULAITONS:" clarify the difference. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 a four (4) sidewalk is required form the proposed accessible vehicle parking space to the accessible entrance of the building. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0201 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, documentation that the Design Professional and Historic review has been completed. |
| 11/13/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 15, 2012 SUBJECT: No Anchovies Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Krebs Carhuff Attn: Philip Carhuff LOCATION: 870 E University Blvd; T14S R14E Sec07; Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0201 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan review. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval. 1) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0201) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.4: Revise the project-location map on the development plan document to meet the minimum requirements per DS Sec.2-01.2.6, specifically provide the map at the right 3"=1 mile scale. 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.A: Revise the development plan document to provide all site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to label University Blvd as "Public." 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to include all information regarding the existing public right-of-way for University Blvd. Label the width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to dimension the width of the existing alley as shown in plan view. 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to provide the required 2.5-foot overhang dimension from the front of the proposed wheel stops. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.3.C.1. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to clearly dimension all PAAL widths to verify minimum requirements, specifically the PAAL located adjacent to the parking stalls and the existing trees. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan documents to provide the minimum dimensions for the required back-up spur per LUC 3.3.6.D. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to clearly label the required separation of the proposed vehicular use area to the property located along the west side. Refer to LUC 3.3.6.8; A barrier, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise Keynote #34 on the development plan document to reference the PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvement for the proposed concrete sidewalk, or provide a detail in the plan set to meet minimum conformance with said detail. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to verify that pedestrian circulation connects all buildings to all other areas of development, pedestrian circulation within the right-of-way, and to the proposed refuse enclosures per DS Sec.2-08.3.1. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document to provide a construction detail for the refuse enclosures. The detail must match DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc. Any deviation from the Development Standard and Figure 3a will require prior approval from Environmental Services along with a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) application and approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 11/26/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Flip the accessible parking space with the accessible aisle and provide a sidewalk ramp as per ICC A 117.1, Section 405. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/28/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall not be considered through an HPZ review LUC 2.8.8.6.L. 2. Include with re-submittal HPZ approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 3. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed 4. Additional comments may apply |
| 11/29/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes b. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 11/30/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/03/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | The occupant load proposed is over 100 for a Group A-2 occupancy. Please indicate on plans that the building has an approved automatic fire sprinkler system or that one will be installed. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |