Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0195
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/21/2012 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | Per COT/RWRD Sewer Submittal Review Worksheet. |
| 11/21/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/23/2012 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | Defer to Rezoning. |
| 11/23/2012 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | We've review the documents and have no comment as development at this site does not seem to impact any Parks planning. Julie Parizek Project Manager Parks and Recreation Department City of Tucson (520) 837-8042 |
| 11/27/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | No objections/adverse comments. See attached. Attachments are in SIRE ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG_logotype 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 792-1093 x506 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagnet.org <mailto:ekramer@pagnet.org> ekramer@pagnet.org |
| 11/28/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | Comments are in SIRE |
| 11/30/2012 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#256996 November 29, 2012 Physical Resource Engineering 4655 N Flowing Wells Tucson, Arizona 85705 Dear Physical Resource Engineering: SUBJECT: Couston Rezoning DP12-0195 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 21, 2012. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 12/04/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Couston Rezoning Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0195 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 5, 2012 (Revised) DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project was reviewed for full code compliance with the Land Use Code and Development Standards. 2. It is Zonings understanding that the prior Zoning Administrator provided written direction in regard to the proposed vehicle access to the proposed duplex as shown on the plan. Please provide a copy of this direction. 3. Remove the PDP from this set of plans. 4. Remove all references to the "PC/COT" standard details for any construction on site. The "PC/COT" standard details are for right-of-way improvements. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.B Sheets DP1, L-1, L-2, I-1 & I-2 provide a brief legal description within the title block. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block on sheets C1, C2, L-1, L-2, I-1 & I-2. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the page number and number of pages, "X of 5", etc. within the title block on all sheets. This includes all sheets i.e. civil, landscape, irrigation, etc. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on all sheets, DP12-0195, C9-11-11, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.5 The sheet index should include the landscape and irrigation sheets. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Revise "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTE 7" to include the LUC "SEC. 2.8.3". 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c The lot coverage calculation shown on the plan is not correct. 11,411.47/16,123.47 = 70.77% lot coverage. This exceeds the allowed 70%, a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required prior to approval of the development package. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension at the south end of the angled vehicle parking between the existing wall and curb. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said along the west property line north of the existing wall some type of barrier is required. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 There is an existing fence that appears to block the access lane that provides the exit along 10th Ave., demonstrate on the plan how the exit will be provided. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 There is an existing gate shown at the entrance access lane, off of Speedway Blvd., that provides access to required parking. Provide a note on the plan that this gate is to remain open during business hours. This also will apply for the exit gate that is needed along 10th Ave. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Per LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.2 Access lanes and PAALs shall be setback at least two (2) feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation, and delivery vehicles. That said show the required two (2) foot setback along the west side of the PAAL/access lane west of the angled parking. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Until the angled vehicle parking "A" Parking Angle dimension is provided the PAAL width requirement cannot be verified for the PAAL located to the west of the angled parking. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation shows eleven (11) vehicle parking spaces provided there are only seven (7) shown on the plan. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Per Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. That said provide the number of physically disabled spaces required and provided in the vehicle parking space calculation. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a typical vehicle parking space detail for both a standard and physically disabled space. The detail should shown the location of the wheel stop and provide a dimension for the location based on LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Per LUC Section 3.3.6.4.B.2 A motor vehicle off-street parking space shall have a minimum width of ten (10) feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said demonstrate on the plan how both vehicle parking spaces east of the duplex meet this requirement. 20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a "A" Parking Angle dimension for the angled parking, see LUC Table 3.3.6.4.A.I. 21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.d Provide a Long & Short Term bicycle parking spaces calculation on the plan. This calculation should address the number required and number provided. 22. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.d Provide a detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 and 3.3.9.3 are met for the required Short-term bicycle parking. 23. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Provide street perimeter yard setback dimensions from the proposed duplex to 10th Ave. This setback dimension is based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B. 24. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions from the proposed duplex to the south and west property line. 25. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O There are two (2) cisterns shown on the plan. Provide perimeter yard setback dimensions on the plan for the cisterns. 26. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and height for the existing building within the footprint of the building. 27. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the height for the proposed duplex within the footprint of the building. 28. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R It appears that the existing utility equipment shown along the west side of the existing building encroached into the required four (4) foot sidewalk. Demonstrate on the plan how the required four (4) foot sidewalk width is maintained. 29. D.S. 2-01.3.9.U Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of re-zoning condition 14 are met on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0195 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & written approval from the Zoning Administrator. |
| 12/04/2012 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and recommends its acceptance. Thank you. |
| 12/13/2012 | NONE | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 12/13/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/13/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Zelin Canchola TDOT Traffic Engineering PROJECT: Couston Rezoning Development Package DP12-0195 1. Driveway curb radius from Speedway Blvd must be 25 feet. 2. Show sight visibility Triangles for both driveways. 3. If gate permanent, turnaround will be needed. |
| 12/13/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Zelin Canchola TDOT Traffic Engineering PROJECT: Couston Rezoning Development Package DP12-0195 1. Driveway curb radius from Speedway Blvd must be 25 feet. 2. Show sight visibility Triangles for both driveways. 3. If gate permanent, turnaround will be needed. |
| 12/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | As determined by the Zoning reviewer, this project is to be reviewed for full code compliance. SHEET 1 1. Provide a ramp to the accessible parking aisle and a large scale detail showing all accessible requirements. 2. Provide ramps and detectable warnings at both ends of the marked crossing and a large scale detail showing all accessible requirements. 3. Note that the accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3, 5% max running and 2% max cross slopes. 4. Please provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, signage, grade slopes, access to accessible routes and aisle. 5. Provide a gate through the wrought iron fence for the access to the 10th street right of way. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/19/2012 | CAGUILA1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/19/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 19, 2012 SUBJECT: Couston Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Metro TED Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: 4280 N 1st Ave; T13S R13E Sec24 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0195 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (Oracle Engineering Group, Inc., 15NOV12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.E: Revise the title block on the development plan document to include the page number and number of pages of all sheets that are included within the set (i.e. Landscape Sheets). 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0195) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Revise Paving Grading Note #6 on Sheet C2 to remove the reference to Pima County and replace it with the following "Work is to be in conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements)." 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Revise General Notes #7 and 8 on the Development Plan Package to reference all special overlay zones that are applicable to this site, specifically state that "the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." It is acknowledged that the General Notes states conformance, but it does not read per the referenced Development Standard. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to label all roadways as "Public." Also label Speedway as "MS&R Arterial." 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to include all information regarding the existing public right-of-way for Speedway Blvd, Queen Ave and 10th Ave. Label the width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Provide approval from City of Tucson Transportation and Planning for the proposed gated entrance at Speedway Blvd. All gated entrances off of a MS&R Route must provide a vehicle turn around to prevent vehicles from having to back out into a MS&R Route if closed. Verify if a gate is proposed at the PAAL location on 10th Ave. Per plan view it appears an existing fence blocks off the proposed PAAL, clarify. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: A right-of-way use permit application will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way prior to construction. Contact the Permits and Codes Section in the Transportation Department for ROW Permit application and process. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the 18-foot radii at the proposed driveway locations at 10th and Queen Ave per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Revise the development plan document to label the 25-foot radii at the proposed driveway location at Speedway Blvd City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to dimension the near and far side sight visibility for all PAALs to Local Streets (Queen and 10th Ave) per DS Sec.3-01.5.3. Also label and dimension the near side SVT for 10th Ave and Speedway Blvd intersection. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to dimension the proposed angular parking spaces and PAAL per LUC Table 3.3.6.4.A.I. Until "A" Parking Angle dimension is provided the PAAL width requirement cannot be verified for the PAAL located to the west of the angled parking, revise. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to dimension the required 2.5-foot overhang from the front of the curb stop to the curb and sidewalk. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to clearly label the required separation of the proposed vehicular use area to the property located along the west side of the site along with the access driveway off of Queen Ave. Refer to LUC 3.3.6.8; A barrier, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide a typical vehicle parking space detail for both a standard and physically disabled space. The detail should show the location of the wheel stop and provide a dimension for the location based on LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C. 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.J: Revise the development plan document to label all dimensions for the MS&R Route, Speedway Blvd. Since the project site is adjacent to a Major Street & Route clearly label and dimension the future right-of-way, curbing and sidewalk area. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M: DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension the required minimum 2-foot setback from the property line to the top of fill slope for the proposed water harvesting basin located along the west property line. 19) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to label all sidewalk widths clearly in plan view. Verify the clear 4-foot width along the west side of the existing building. 20) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to clearly label all gate locations with minimum widths for sidewalk areas that transect the existing fence as denoted by Keynote #1. 21) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Clarify Keynote #29 that depicts a sidewalk with curb located in the water harvesting basin adjacent to the southeast side of the new duplex. 22) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 23) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Verify or provide approval through Environmental Services for refuse pickup. Per DS Sec.6-01 onsite refuse collection is required and the development plan package should reflect the location and access to the required refuse container. If Environmental Service is not requiring onsite collection then PDSD Engineering will approve this comment based on their written approval for refuse collection. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 12/19/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer b. the location of the building connection to the public sewer c. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Verify the need for a backflow preventer for the water service with Tucson Water. |
| 12/19/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the landscape plan, the Re-zoning, and DDO case numbers, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 2. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 3. Additional comments may apply |
| 12/20/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Project denied. Screen wall is blocking access to waste and recycle container. There must be a clear 14'x40' straight approach to container area. See Figure 1 of Development std. 6-01. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 12/20/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 12/20/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/20/2012 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 12/20/2012 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/21/2012 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed. Revisions are required. Two rolled sets of the plan, a disk and all other items required by review staff must be include with the resubmittal. |
| 12/21/2012 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | See e-mail in SIRE |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/26/2012 | CPIERCE1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 12/26/2012 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |