Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0193
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/21/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/05/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP12-0193 - 7942 -48 E. Broadway Blvd. Retail Building Remodel - New Drive Through Development Package - Site Plan review TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 5, 2012 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-01.3.2.D - Include the administrative address in the title block. 2. DS 2-01.3.2.E - The sheet number should be revised to sheet one of one. C-2 would imply that there are other sheets, which is not the case. 3. DS 2-01.3.7.A.2 and DS 2-01.3.8.A and DS 2-01.3.9.A- After reviewing the Assessor's information (see the attached copy of the P.C. Assessor's map) and comparing it to the site plan it does not appear that the property boundaries are drawn correctly on the plan. If there has been a change in the boundary of the overall site please provide documentation supporting the changes and approvals of such changes. The new site plan depicts a new loading zone in the southwest corner of the site. Based on the assessor's map the new loading zone is proposed on property that is not par of the supposed site boundary of this development. Clarify if there is recorded use agreement for the area where the new loading zone has been proposed. Also based on the new site plan submitted for review the parking is depicted on property that is not part of the site. Provide documentation that indicates there is some form of cross access, parking, dumpster etc. 4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 - Identify the use on lot 2. The information under Development Data text block indicates the use on lot two is shell building. This is not considered a use and zoning criteria cannot be verified based on non-information. In addition it is not clear if the drive-through is for a restaurant or for what use. This information needs to be provided. Add the flowing information to the uses listed under the development data text block: add the note "subject to Section 3.5.4.6.A. and .C" to the Food Service use note. Add the "subject to Section 3.5.9.2.C" to the General Merchandise note. 5. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a - It is not clear under the parking calculations what the proposed use of "food & beverage sales" is supposed to include. The parking requirements for food service are 1 space per 100 square feet of GFA. Food and beverage sales parking requirements are 1 space per 300 square feet of GFA. If this is just a typo, revise the parking calculations notes appropriately. The drive-through stacking for any drive through service has changed from 6 to 3. Per the plan six stacking spaces are proposed and two of them are within the 24 foot PAAL right behind the parking spaces. Remove stacking spaces 5 and 6 as they are not required by code. Identify the location of the ordering menu if there will be one provided. It must not be located anywhere in the PAAL where stacking would limit the 24 -foot width of the PAAL behind the parking spaces. Some type of barriers is required along the property boundary where the pavement or vehicle use area is adjacent to the undeveloped parcels to the south (southwest corner). 6. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c - Demonstrate that the loading zones area accessible as depicted on the plan. Demonstrate maneuverability in and out of both loading zones. 7. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d - Identify the location of the bicycle parking facilities. If dimensioned detail drawings for short and long term facilities are needed to demonstrate compliance include them on the plan. Refer to LUC section 3.3.9 Bicycle Parking Design Criteria for more information. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\DP12-0193 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 12/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/18/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/19/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide previous approved s landscape plan for reference. If no plans exist then this submittal will become the document of record. Provide the following information if necessary: " Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. " Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material. Note: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B 2. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed 3. Additional comments may apply |
| 12/19/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/20/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/20/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The plan has section callouts that refer to sheet C-1. Please provide copies of the referenced sheet. Clarify the extent of the existing site. Three lots are indicated but the boundaries of Lot 3 are not provided. Please clarify. Provide barriers to prevent motor vehicle from leaving the paved vehicle use areas onto undeveloped portions of the site. It appears parking striping is to be removed from along the east property line. Clearly indicate this by symbol or notation. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |