Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0177
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10/2012 | CAGUILA1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/11/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/11/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SITE PLAN 1. Need to finish site plan. Please show all improvements such as parking, sidewalks and etc. 2. Provide one accessible parking space (Van Accessible) and connect to accessible route to Building 2. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/15/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/16/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Sentinel Peak Brewing Company Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0177 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 8, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan. This plan should show the; "EXISTING STAGE', "EXISTING BOX OFFICE", etc. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the page number and number of pages, "X of Y", etc. within the title block on all sheets. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0177, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.1 Provide a general note stating "EXISTING ZONING IS I-1". 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 Provide a general note listing the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Provide a general note identifying the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. The proposed use should be listed as "PERISHABLE GOODS MANUFACTURING "33", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.5.2.A AND .B AND SEC. 3.5.5.1.B, .D, .E, .F, AND .H". 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general notes stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a Provide a general note listing the floor area for each building on site. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Per D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.d When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. As a general note provide floor area ratio (FAR) calculation for the entire site. The calculation should include the allowed floor area (FA) and the proposed floor area (FA). See LUC Section 3.2.11. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c As it appears that there has been building added to the site, "EXIST BOX OFFICE, EXIST MERCHANDISE OFFICE, etc, provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. That said provide the zoning for the parcels south of Grant Road. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area on the plan. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H 5.a Per D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.d When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. Provide a vehicle parking space calculation for the entire site that includes the number required and the number proposed. Until all uses are identified the vehicle parking requirements cannot be verified. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.c When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. Provide a loading space calculation for the entire site that includes the number required and the number proposed. Until all uses are identified the vehicle parking requirements cannot be verified. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. Provide a bicycle parking calculation for the entire site that includes the number required and the number proposed. Until all uses are identified the vehicle parking requirements cannot be verified. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.J Show the future intersection widening for Grant Road on the plan. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and LUC Table 3.2.6-I the street perimeter yard setbacks are not shown correctly. Per LUC Table 3.2.6-I Footnote 2 The setback is measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location. Show the future curb location for both Grand and Flowing Wells Road on the plan along with the building setbacks shown correctly 20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R There is an "EXISTING CONCRETE PATIO" called out on the plans. What is the proposed use of this patio. 22. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Clarify what the "5' PEDESTRIAN PATH" is constructed of on the plan. As the proposed brewing company is a change of use, a pedestrian circulation/accessible route is required to connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian pedestrian circulation/accessible route located in any adjacent streets. That said provide a sidewalk that connects to the streets and all buildings on site. 23. Due to the lack of information provided on this plan additional comments may be forth coming once the above comments have been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0177 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 10/16/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide previous approved site and landscape plans for reference. If no plans exist then this submittal will become the document of record. 2. Provide development plan with information specified in Development Standard 2-01.0: 3. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows. a. If the expansion is less than twenty-five (25) percent, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is twenty-five (25) percent or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a twenty-five (25) percent or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site. Provide expansion calculations. 4. Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving designs. A water-conserving design, includes grouping of plants with similar water requirements and use of efficient irrigation systems per LUC 3.7.4.1. Provide Information on turf area irrigation Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed 5. Additional comments may apply |
| 10/17/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/22/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts g. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 10/25/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 25, 2012 SUBJECT: Sentinel Peak Brewing Co Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Matt Gordon LOCATION: 1102 W Grant Road; T13S R13E Sec35; Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0177 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Provide a Drainage Statement for the property to ensure conformance with Critical Basin Design per DS Sec.10-01. The property is located within a Critical Basin of Kreuger Wash and the Drainage Statement needs to show that overall detention/retention basin requirements have been addressed. 2) DS 10-03: Verify with the Landscaping Section that the proposed parking lot area does not fall under DS Sec.10-03 Commercial Rainwater Harvesting. If so provide all requirements within DS Sec.10-03 to ensure compliance with the standard and Stormwater runoff. SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval. 3) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.1: Revise the development plan document to include the name, mailing and email addresses and phone numbers of the registrant, persons, firms, etc that prepared the Development Plan Package. 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0177) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Provide the following note on the development plan document stating; "All retaining walls, proposed fencing and other walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Planning Development Services Departments." 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Provide a General Note on the Development Plan Package that references all special overlay zones that are applicable to this site, specifically state that "the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.B.1.a: Revise the development plan document to include a Drainage Note per the referenced standard specifically; "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.B.3.a: Revise General Note #3 of the development plan to correctly state the drainage note per the referenced standard; "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan." 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.D: Revise the development plan document to include a General Note per the referenced section; "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to label Grant Road as "MS&R Arterial" 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to dimension the near and far side sight visibility for all PAALs to Local and/or MS&R Street per DS Sec.3-01.5.3. Verify the far side SVT for Flowing Wells and Grant intersection. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to show design of the vehicular use area as required by Zoning per LUC 3.3.6. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to clearly dimension all PAAL widths to verify minimum requirements. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.J: Revise the development plan document to label all dimensions for the MS&R Route, Grant Road. Since the project site is adjacent to a Major Street & Route clearly label and dimension the future sidewalk area. 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to verify that pedestrian circulation connects all buildings to all other areas of development, pedestrian circulation within the right-of-way, and to the proposed refuse enclosures per DS Sec.2-08.3.1. 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Verify or provide approval through Environmental Services for refuse pickup. Per DS Sec.6-01 onsite refuse collection is required and the development plan package should reflect the location and access to the required refuse container. If Environmental Service is not requiring onsite collection then PDSD Engineering will approve this comment based on their written approval for refuse collection. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 10/25/2012 | KRISTIN GREENE | WWM | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/19/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/19/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |