Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0175
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/12/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/18/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/26/2012 | LEERAY HANLY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/30/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Revise the plans to document compliance with rezoning condition 10, relative to design standards for the 6' high masonry wall. C9-12-06 3) Revise the water harvesting calculations. In order for the calculations to be accurate the impervious portions of the subwatershed should exceed 3.7 times the Plant Canopy Area. Refer to DS 10-03. |
| 10/30/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8.4.2 |
| 10/30/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP12--0175 777 E Glenn Street Quick Trip #1454 Access Drive TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 30, 2012 DUE DATE: November 02, 2012 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 01. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 3, 2012. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with Development Standards 2-01 format and content and other development standards related to 2-08, 3-01, and LUC development and design criteria. 02. DS 2-01.3.1 - List the email addresses of all the contacts under the Projects Contact List text block. 03. DS 2-01.3.3 - Relevant case numbers (development package document, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. List Rezoning case number as noted above next to the title block and list on the cover sheet or sheet two (2) the conditions of rezoning under a separate text block and include the date of approval or authorization. 04. DS 2-01.3.7.A.1 - On sheet 2, under the Zoning text block, revise zoning note one (1) to state that the existing zoning is R-2 and the proposed zoning is P per rezoning case C9-12-06. If the zoning was effectuated by other means other than the requirement for a permit the current zoning is still R-2. Revise the note as requested. 05. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 - Zoning note 3 must be revised to correctly identify the use of the rezoned property. The rezoned property to "P Zone" does not allow for any type of commercial use therefore the information listed in note 3 is incorrect. The use of the "P Zone" property is strictly for access only (Vehicular use) in this case only. Typically P zone allows for vehicle parking and PAALs associated with the Parking spaces, in this case the P zone was only to allow and Access Drive. The development designator is "40" for the use. Revise the note accordingly. 06. DS 2-01.3.9.F - Label the zoning classification across the street Euclid Avenue and Glenn Street 07. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 and DS 2-01.3.9.O - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. The SVTs for the new Driveway must be drawn labeled and dimensioned. 08. DS 2-01.3.9.H.4 - Label Euclid Avenue as a Public Street. 09. DS 2-01.3.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw and dimension the Major Street right-of-way lines for Glenn Street. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 10. DS 2-01.3.9.L - If applicable, all proposed or existing easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Include recordation information for each easement. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.M - The grading plan sheets have been reviewed and will be approved by zoning as part of the overall Development Package. Once Zoning approves the Development package it will include approval of the grading plan as it pertains to zoning review purview. Ensure that any changes made to the Site plan are made to the grading plan and any applicable plan sheets. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. See related comment no. 3. 13. DS 2-01.3.9.W - If applicable to this project, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26 may be required. 14. DS 2-01.3.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. For more specific information, refer to Development Standard 2-07.0. 15. Provide documentation for the Pima County Assessor's Lot Combo Combination. Zoning cannot approve this development package until the lot combo is completed and the documentation provided to CDRC for Zoning Review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\DP12-0175dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 10/31/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 10/31/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 11/02/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: The WLB Group DATE: November 05, 2012 4444 E. Broadway Blvd. FROM: Paul Machado Tucson, Arizona 85711 Engineering Division Subject: QT-777 E. Glenn Street Development Package, DP12-0175 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 31 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package. The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. General Notes. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. D.S. 2-01.3.7. F. Trails Notes. List the following notes as appropriate. 3. The Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan does not show any trails on or adjacent to the development site. E. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). 3. Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. D.S. 2-01.3.9. J. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) Comment is for Glenn Street, which is a Collector Street with a Future R/W width of 64'. The sidewalk location for a MS&R with a 64' R/W is 9' from the future R/W. O. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 4. Include a compact disk (CD) containing the latest/revised submittal of the dev. plan, reports and documents associated with this project with the latest submittal. 5. Per the City of Tucson Dept. of Transportation, traffic circulation issues have arisen with the existing ingress/egress along Glenn Street. Provide additional left turn restrictions at the existing I/E. Please contact Jose Ortiz of TDOT at 837-6730 for any additional information. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. The DR says that the ponding depth for the basin is 0.5'. However the plans indicate that it is only 0.33' deep. Which is correct? 3. A flood plain use permit is required for any work performed in the regulated floodplain. SWPPP: 1. There are no BMP's shown on the plans. 2. Show the concrete washout area on the plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/777 E. Glenn St. DEVPKG-SITE |
| 11/05/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Denied | This review has been completed. Revisions are required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/20/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/19/2012 | SHANAE POWELL | REJECT SHELF | Completed |