Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0174
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/09/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/23/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP12-0174 1025 E Irvington Road - Food Service Dairy Queen - Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 23, 2012 DUE DATE: November 02, 2012 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 01. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the Development plan (development package) has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 2, 2013. Zoning has reviewed this development package for compliance with the format and content standards of development standards 2-01, compliance with the Land Use Code development criteria and site design, and applicable development standards related to pedestrian circulation. 02. Separate the development package and the building plans. While the building plans can be reviewed concurrently with the development package site review, they are two separate submittals and activity numbers. The development package standards 2-01 is to be followed for format and site content. The following comments are related to the Development Package site review only. Address the comments and make the revisions or changes requested. 03. DS 2-01.2.5 - Add the approval stamp to each development package sheet. The approval stamp can be downloaded from the PDSD web site. Here is the link to download the digital approval stamp: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/dsd/CDRC/dvpkg_stamp_10-11.jpeg Add the approval stamp to each development package sheet. 04. DS 2-01.2.9 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet of the development package. 05. DS 2-01.3.1 - List the email addresses for the owner and the all the person's, firms, or organizations that helped prepare the development package drawings. The email addresses should be listed under the project directory listing on the first sheet of the development package. 06. DS 2-01.3.2.D - List the Site Administrative Address on sheet one of the development package. 07. DS 2-01.3.2.E - If applicable a sheet index for the sheets in the development package must be included on sheet one. Number the sheets and the appropriate sheet of "X", i.e. 1 of 4, 2 of 4, etc. 08. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.a - It is clear, after reviewing the site plan and the building plans that the building square footages do not match. The building square footages of the existing building area, expansion of building area, and the patio should be listed separately on the site plan. The Drive-Through area is not considered in the FAR of the building. The building expansion is the portion that is enclosed to create new floor area. The patio is an open area and is not part of the FAR but the patio use area is included in the calculation to determine the parking requirements and is measured from the outside edges of the railing. Per the building and patio dimensions on sheet A-2 the square footages do not match the square footages of the building and the patio as listed on the site plan. The outside dimensions of a building are used to calculate the GFA. Based on the difference in square footages it appears that additional parking will be required. Label and dimension the building, patio, patio structure and drive-through structure on the site plan to match the building plans dimensions. Per the 2012 Aerials it appears that there are two mobile containers along the north east corner of the site. If the containers are still on site and being used, they must be included in the square footage calculations and additional parking will be required. 09. DS 2-01.3.7.B.1.a - Add to the general notes text block on sheet one of the Development Package Site Plan, the note verbatim as listed in this section, (DS 2-01.3.7.B.1.a) 10. DS 2-01.3.7.D - There are two (2) General Notes labeled as #8 on the site plan sheet. General note #8 has been duplicated in general note 10 11. DS 2-01.3.8.B - If applicable, draw, label, and list the recordation of any easements on the site. 12. DS 2-01.3.8.C and DS 2-01.3.9.J - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) Irvington is an Arterial road on the MS&R Map and is not subject to additional Widening but is subject to the intersection widening. This site is within 300 feet of the intersection of Park and Irvington intersection and is subject to a future 15 feet of right of way take per the MS&R map. This future widening must be drawn and dimensioned on the plan along with the future curb and sidewalk location. This potential widening would impact the outside dining which may or would be in the future intersection widening area. In order to approve the plan as proposed and drawn, a recorded MS&R covenant and the site plan as an exhibit will have to be recorded once all the reviews have been done and DP Site plan approved by all reviewers. If you have questions on this specific comment give me a call. 13. DS 2-01.3.9 H.2 - Show the future sight visibility triangles based on the future intersection widening. 14. DS 2-01.3.9 H.5.a - Demonstrate that three stacking spaces for the drive through can be accommodated in the area now that a parking space is proposed adjacent to the north wall. Also it appears that there is an existing menu board at the northwest corner of the building. Is this menu board going to be removed, relocated or left in place? 15. DS 2-01.3.9 H.5.d - Show the bicycle parking facility fully dimensioned and a detail drawing of the type of rack to be used. For specifics on the bicycle parking facility design see LUC section 3.3.9. 16. DS 2-01.3.9 O - Add an overall building setback from the existing and future curb locations to the new patio structure. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\DP12-0174.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package Site plan and additional requested documents (recorded MS&R Covenant) |
| 10/24/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 10/25/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a detetcable warning strip at the East end of the marked crossing. 2. As per ICC A117.1, section 502.5, the accessible parking and aisle areas are to have a mazium slope of 2% in all directions. 3. Please show the slopes of all accessible route complying with ICC A117.1, section 403.3; 5% max running slope and 2% max cross slopes. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/30/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The provisions of the MS&R setback zone apply to the following uses on all property LUC 2.8.3.2 2. All uses of land or structures legally existing as of June 27, 1988, which are expanded in floor area, lot coverage, parking, seating capacity, or any other expansion of use, as listed below. 3. If the expansion is less than twenty-five (25) percent, the MS&R provisions apply to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B 4. Provide the following: a. Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. b. Both the proper and common name of each type of plant 5. If the expansion is twenty-five (25) percent or more, the MS&R provisions apply to the proposed expansion and to any parking and landscaping requirements which apply to the overall development. Provide a separate landscape/irrigation plan within information specified within. DS 2-06. 6. All expansions which occur after the adoption of this Code are cumulated in determining the twenty-five (25) percent expansion. Provide correct expansion calculations. 7. The following comment may apply: (See Zoning comments) 8. An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City. 9. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed 10. Additional comments may apply |
| 10/31/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/02/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/15/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |