Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0172
Parcel: 11310109B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP12-0172
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/02/2012 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
10/03/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/03/2012 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied 1. Show cross slope at marked crossing, no more than 2%.
2. Detail "E" shows 6" high curb and varies. Please clarify curb height at marked crossing. Will a curb ramp be required. If so, don't forget the detectable warning strip.
3. Show dimension width of accessible parking and aisle.
END OF REVIEW
10/05/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. LUC 2.8.3.2 All uses of land or structures legally existing as of June 27, 1988, which are expanded in floor area, lot coverage, parking, seating capacity, or any other expansion of use the following applies:

2. If the expansion is twenty-five (25) percent or more, the MS&R provisions apply to the proposed expansion and to any parking and landscaping requirements which apply to the overall development. Verify expansion calculations.

3. If expansion is less then 25%: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B

4. The site plan must be accompanied by a landscape plan with information specified in Development Standard 2-07.0. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans.

5. Identify, type, size, and height of existing and / or proposed signage LUC 2-02.2.0

6. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed

7. Additional comments may apply.
10/09/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Dunkin Donuts - 2553 N. Campbell Avenue
Development Package (1st Review)
DP12-0172

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 9, 2012

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Based on the last approved site plan in COT PRO the square footage of the building was 1,597, the square footage for the existing building shown on this plan is 1,724 and with the proposed expansion total square footage of 2,085. That said it appears that the cumulative building expansion is 30.6 percent therefore full code may be required for the entire site. Clarify the difference in existing square footage.

2. Based on the above comment Zoning has reviewed this project for full LUC code compliance.

3. Remove all demolition references and notes from the site plan.

The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0:

1. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Revise General Note 4 to include "EXISTING & PROPOSED USE".

2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 General Note 13 has the wrong Development Designator "30". Revise to show "DD 28".

3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Remove General Note 14 as lot coverage is not applicable.

4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan.

5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.A As this site is comprised of three (3) parcels - 113-10-109B, 113-10-109C, 113-10-111B - a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of an approved Pima Country Combination Request form with your next submittal.

6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. That said provide the zoning for the parcels located on the east side of Campbell and the south side of Silver.

7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a wheel stop detail that provides a location dimension, see LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C.

9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The In-Lieu fees will need to be paid prior to approval of this development plan. Contact Adam Smith @837-6951 for information about the fees.

10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.J If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Under General Note 25 the "EAST - CAMPBELL AVENUE (21' OF H TO CURB FACE) is not correct. Per LUC Table 3.2.6.I foot note 2 the setback is measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location.

12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Under General Note 25 the "SOUTH - CAMPBELL AVENUE" should read "SOUTH - SILVER STREET".

13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Under General Note 25 the "WEST - ADJACENT C-1 ZONE = 0'" is not correct. The zoning to the west is R-2 and the required setback is 1 ½ (H).or based on a 15' high building wall the required setback would be 22.5'.

14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.A At least one 910 sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. That said provide a sidewalk that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-08.5.1 from both street sidewalks to the building.

15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R The sidewalks shown along the north and south side of the building do not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-08.5.1.A. Either provide a four (4) foot wide sidewalk or a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) must be approved to reduce the sidewalk width to three (3) feet.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0172

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & approved Pima County Lot Combination.
10/09/2012 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
10/12/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer
b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants
c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned)
d. the location of the building connection to the public sewer
e. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes
f. the first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/05/2012 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed