Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0171
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/01/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/04/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | The existing fire hydrant exceeds the 300 distance requirement from all exterior walls of the proposed structure. An additional fire hydrant is required to be installed closer to the proposed structure. |
| 10/10/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET C0.1 1. At detail 6: a. Indicate a 2% maxium slope in all directions for all surface areas of the accessible parking spaces and aisle. b. Detectable warning strips are not required at this configuration. Please remove the indication for the strips. SHEET C2.1 2. For the two marked crossings shown to Broadway, please provide detectable warning strips at both ends for each crossing as per ICC A 117.1, Sections 406.12 and .14. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/17/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Sec. 2.8.3.4. 2. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Obtain permission for use of R.O.W. 3. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Identify screening element(s). 4. Note: The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements. 5. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 6. All new commercial development and site plans submitted after June 1, 2010, shall include a rainwater harvesting plan. The rainwater harvesting plan shall include a landscape water budget and an implementation plan Sec. 6-182. Provide plans with information specified within DS 10-03. 7. Add note pertaining to: The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. 8. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per DS 2-15.2.0.C 9. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 10. Additional comments may apply. |
| 10/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Water service lines for fire sprinkler systems (Classes 1 and 2) require the installation of a double check valve assembly, not a reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly. Reference: Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-75 (a) (20), Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 10/18/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
| 10/19/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0171 8825 E. Broadway Blvd. Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10/19/12 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-01.2.5 Revise the development plan document to include the correct CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp 2. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0171. Place this case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. 3. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note indicating that this project has been designed to meet the criteria of the overlay zones that are applicable to the property, such as Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone 4. DS 2-01.3.8.S If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 5. DS 2-01.3.9.H.1 Provide documentation of the implied vehicle cross access agreement with the property to the west. 6. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 7. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. See LUC Sec. 3.3.4 for criteria. 8. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c Provide as a general note the number of required and the number of provided loading zones. Per LUC Sec. 3.4.5 a loading zone is not required for this project. Therefore indicate 0 required and 0 provided. 9. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide dimensioned details of the long and short term bicycle parking spaces and type of racks and enclosures. Clearly indicate the size of the parking space, size and location of the access aisle, type of racks. The bicycle rack indicated on detail 5 of CO.1 is not an approved type of short term bicycle rack. See LUC Sec. 3.3.9.5 for criteria. See LUC Sec. 3.3.9.4 for criteria for long term bicycle parking. Provide in the calculations the number of required and the number of provided short and long term bicycle parking spaces. See LUC Sec. 3.3.8.2. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.O Provide the height of the north wall of the building above adjacent grade. This is required in order to determine the required setback from the north property line. Required setback is 1 ½ times the height of the wall from the R-1 zoned property adjacent to the north property line. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the allowed height and proposed height of the building. See LUC Sec. See LUC Sec. 3.2.3.2.B with development designator 28. Also provide the height of the proposed building within the footprint on sheet C2.1. Provide the allowed and provided Floor Area Ratio (FAR). See LUC Sec. 3.2.3.2.B with development designator 28. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.R. The portion of the pedestrian circulation path from the street which is located between the vehicle parking spaces is required to meet DS 2-08.5.1.C for composition and DS 2-08.4.1 the sidewalk (which this area is considered) must be physically separated from any vehicle use area. Either raise the sidewalk with ramps at each end or provide curbing on each side of the sidewalk. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0171.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 10/23/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 23, 2012 DP12-0171 AutoZone Store #2749 The development package cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following 1. Provide the correct floodplain information in the note on the fist sheet. The panel is 2306 M with a revision date of September 28, 2012. 2. Revise the solid waste enclosure details and plan view to be consistent with Development Standard 6-01. For example, the DS requires bollards on the sides as well as the back of the enclosure. The details on plan sheet C0.1 don't show the side bollards but the plan view appears to indicate them. If a modified enclosure design is desired, a Development Standards Modification Request may be submitted. 3. The maximum back-up distance for a solid waste collection vehicle is 80 feet. Show how this standard is met on the plan. DS 6-01.5.3.F 4. Note 3 on sheet C0.3 indicates that all construction must conform to the latest Maricopa Association of Governments standard details and specifications. Since Tucson is outside of Maricopa County, please provide copies of all relevant details and specifications or reference Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Details and Specifications. 5. Make sure that references to details are correct throughout the plans. For example Detail 8 on Sheet C0.1 references locations not included in this plan set. 6. Show existing and future sight visibility triangles on the site plan in accordance with DS 3-01.5. 7. Provide a letter or email from the City Engineer allowing the landscape buffer to encroach into the right-of-way. DS 2-06.3.4.C.1 8. Clarify how the water-harvesting areas within landscape islands will function with the soil behind the curbs at least 5 inches above the pavement. Explain the function of the curb openings in this configuration. Show how water harvesting will be maximized in accordance with LUC 3.7.4.3.B If you have any questions you may contact me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov or 520.837.4927. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 10/26/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | From TDOT Traffic Engineering RE DP12-0171 DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. Label the right of way line as existing and/or future. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/09/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |