Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0161
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2012 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/20/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Subaru Development Package (2nd Review) DP12-0161 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 20, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 17, 2013 The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. This comment was not addressed. Per our discussions a building plan must be submitted so that a hold can be put on the Certificate of Occupancy. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is a "1' NO-ACCESS EASEMENT" called out along the east property line. As development is proposed with in the easement it must be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. 2. This comment was not addressed. Per our discussions a building plan must be submitted so that a hold can be put on the Certificate of Occupancy. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There are two (2) "30' OPENING IN NO-ACCESS EASMENT" that do not appear to align with the proposed entrance access lane. If the "1' NO-ACCESS EASEMENT" is to remain it will need to revised so that the opening aligns with the proposed entrance access lane. 3. This comment was not addressed. Per our discussions a building plan must be submitted so that a hold can be put on the Certificate of Occupancy. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The "10; EASEMENT FOR COMMUNICATION LINES" shown to be released will need to abandoned prior to approval of this development package. 4. This comment was not addressed. As you have not demonstrated that this RX-1 zoned area meets the requirements of LUC Section 1.3.5 and it appears that you are saying the zoning boundary is incorrect a decision by the Zoning Administrator is required, see LUC Section 1.3.6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F There is proposed development within the RX-1 zoning along the south side of this parcel. Provide documentation that this lot meets the requirements of LUC Section 1.3.5 or remove the proposed development from the RX-1 zoned area. 5. This comment was not addressed for the vehicle parking spaces west of the proposed car wash. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a parking space depth dimension for the parking spaces shown south of the southwest side of the proposed building. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP*, Vehicle Rental and Sales, Long-term bicycle parking is based on Gross Floor Area (GFA). That said the Long-term Bicycle parking Calculation is not correct. Show the correct GFA, 29,811, in the calculation. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Detail "G" Sheet 9, Long-Term bicycle parking, based on the location shown on sheet 5 only one half of the locker will be accessible. 8. This comment was not addressed. Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide the required four (4) foot pedestrian refuge area. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a 4' sidewalk along the southwest side of the proposed building. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Clarify what the doors are that are shown along the west side of the building. If this area is part of the building provide the required sidewalk. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0161 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 11/20/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed. Revision is required. |
| 11/21/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At the North end of the accessible route headed for the Wash Depot and/or Fiesta Lanes, either provide a complete marked crossing connection to one of these businesses or delete the ramp and detectable warning strip and leave a 6" high curb. The situation shown provides an access to the middle of a PAAL and no where else. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/30/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/04/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise as necessary to incorporate revisions requested by other agencies. |
| 12/05/2012 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0161 SUBARU DEALERSHIP/DEVELOPMENT PLANS DATE: December 10, 2012 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/11/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |