Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0160
Parcel: 111060170

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP12-0160
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/18/2012 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approv-Cond Fire Department approved rapid entry required for new gates. Contact Fire Department for type of key switch or knox box.
09/18/2012 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
09/19/2012 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: September 21, 2012
SUBJECT: Vida Nueva Apartments Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: The Architecture Company; Attn: Richard Fe Tom
LOCATION: 3815 E Monte Vista Dr; T13S R14E Sec33; Ward 3
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP12-0160


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (SCE, PLLC, 24AUG12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed:


DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

1) Revise the Drainage Statement to provide the following corrections and or required calculations;

a) Provide calculations for all proposed scupper locations to ensure that the 10-year flow is contained under the pedestrian access paths during a storm event per DS Sec.3-01.2.8.

b) Provide an existing and proposed drainage map with pre and post discharges to ensure that offsite flows have been reduced prior to the Stormwater entering the public right-of-way from the water harvesting areas and proposed scuppers. It is acknowledged that detention/retention requirements do not apply however a reduction in offsite flows into the public right-of-way is required to ensure public safety.

c) Verify with the Landscaping Section that the proposed parking lot area does not fall under DS Sec.10-03 Commercial Rainwater Harvesting. If so provide all requirements within DS Sec.10-03 to ensure compliance with the standard and Stormwater runoff.


SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval.

2) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

3) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0160) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

4) DS Sec.2-01.3.4: Revise the project-location map on the development plan document to label the Section Corners to meet the minimum requirements of DS Sec.2-01.2.6.

5) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Revise the development plan document to include all Notes (General, Grading, Paving, etc) either on Sheet 1 or if necessary on Sheet 2 to be in conformance with the development plan package submittal requirements. The notes should not be scattered throughout the documents, but organized together for easy reference.

6) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to label both Monte Vista Drive and Winstel Blvd as "Public."

7) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Revise the development plan documents to label the required 18-foot radii for the concrete curb returns for the proposed PAAL locations on both local roadways per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards.

8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to correctly label the near and far side sight visibility triangles (SVT's) for the PAAL and local roads along with the intersection of the two local roads per DS Sec.3-01.5.1. The SVT's as shown are drawn incorrectly per the referenced standard and need to be revised, verify if either street has on-site parking.

9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to ensure that no portion of the proposed 6-foot fence or wall is constructed within any of the revised SVT's which would obstruct view.

10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M: Revise the development plan document and Keynotes on Sheet C101 to correctly reference the detail that is associated with the improvements. A review of the first 4 keynotes showed incorrect details on the sheet referenced, revise so all keynotes and details match.

11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document and any associated details to label the required minimum filter fabric specifications or reference to PC/COT Standard Specification 1014. The Development Plan Package is to be used as the construction document for site and grading and must accurately label and detail all improvements in plan view and on all associated details for construction purposes.

12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension the minimum 5-foot width of sidewalk within the right-of-way of Monte Vista Rd and Winstel Blvd per DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A. The plan set shows sidewalk but does not label the 5-foot dimension.

14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and General Note #14 on the civil sheets to reference the proposed COT/PC Standard Detail for Public Improvement #207 for the required curb access ramp at all driveway locations. Or provide a detail that meets or exceeds this standard detail.

15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and details for the refuse enclosures. The detail must match DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc. Any deviation from the Development Standard and Figure 3a will require prior approval from Environmental Services along with a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) application and approval.

16) A right-of-way use permit application will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
09/24/2012 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied SHEET A000, C100, C101
1. Detectable warning strips are not required at the accessible parking aisle. This is a safe zone.
a. This is also for detail 4/C103.
2. Please show width dimensions of all accessible routes.
3. Please show reference to accessible parking detail 4/103.
4. Please show all accessible requirements for sidewalk ramps as required by ICC A117.1, Sections 405 and/or 406, which ever is most applicable. Please include all dimensions, spot elevations, slopes and direction of slope.
5. Several for the detail references are incorrect in the notes. Please reconcil all mis-references.
END OF REVEIW
09/27/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants which will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per Development Standard 2-15.2.0. Submit an actual NPP Application for Exception with note conforming that the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law will be met for any Saguaro / Carnegiea gigantea to be removed from site. Application for Exception can be found @ http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/NPPOapp.pdf

2. Add note to landscape plan: All Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place shall be fenced off per Development Standard No. 2-06.2.2.F.

3. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Verify that any changes to the site plan are reflected on landscape plan DS 2-07.2.1.A.

4. Additional comments may apply
10/01/2012 HEATHER THRALL NPPO REVIEW Denied 1. Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants which will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per Development Standard 2-15.2.0. Submit an actual NPP Application for Exception with note conforming that the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law will be met for any Saguaro / Carnegiea gigantea to be removed from site. Application for Exception can be found @ http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/NPPOapp.pdf

2. Add note to landscape plan: All Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place shall be fenced off per Development Standard No. 2-06.2.2.F.
10/01/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP12-0160
3815 E. Monte Vista Dr.
Development Package

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 09/28/12

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the correct CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

2. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0160. Place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets.

3. DS 2-01.3.4.C On the location map, provide the section corners.

4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide calculations for the provided lot coverage. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.9.2, lot coverage includes all building foot print area and all vehicle use area. Note porches, ramadas, and other open structures do not count towards lot coverage.

5. DS 2-01.3.8.A This site will required he tax parcel combo to be completed and approved. Provide documentation of the completed combo.

Remove from the site plan the property line indicated between the two lots

6. DS 2-01.3.9.H.1 Provide documentation from TDOT approving the sliding gates at all three locations with out turn arounds being provided for vehicles.

7. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 The sight visibility triangles are shown incorrect. Revise.
See engineering comments regarding the fence being located with in the sight visibility triangles.

8. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Because of the nonconforming status of the number of vehicle parking spaces, the relocation of the parking spaces and the increase in lot size, this project will be required to meet the LUC for number of required parking spaces. Per the parking calculations provided the number of required parking spaces is 22. The number of provided parking spaces being provided is 14. A Board of Adjustment variance will be required in order to reduce the number of parking spaces by 8 spaces.
If a BOA variance is granted place the case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. Provide a general note indicating the case number, date of approval, what the variance is for and any conditions of approval.

The location of the trash enclosure interferes with the required backup spur. See LUC Sec. 3.3.6.6.D. Provide dimension from the south parking space to the front of the trash enclosure. Must be a minimum of 6'.

9. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The bicycle parking calculations are incorrect. See LUC Sec. 3.3.8.2. Minimum number of short term Bicycle parking spaces is 2, the minimum number of long term bicycle parking spaces is 11.

Per LUC Sec.3.3.9.3.B.1 The short term bicycle parking spaces must be located within 50' of the main entrance to the buildings.

Provide a detail of the short term and long term bicycle parking spaces, racks, lockers, access aisle, surfacing materials, lighting, etc. See LUC Sec. 3.3.9.

FYI: Per LUC Sec. 3.3.9.4.B.1 The long term bicycle parking spaces can be located within the residential units. Provide a note stating such.

10. DS 2-01.3.9.O The proposed setback from the west property line to the proposed new roof connection must be a minimum of 10' to the west edge of the support column not the center. Provide the height of the proposed roof connection and the new addition to the laundry room on the plan as this could affect the required setback of 10' or ¾ the height of the wall of the structure which ever is greater..

11. DS 2-01.3.9.R Provide dimensions for the width of all pedestrian circulation paths (sidewalks). Minimum width is 4' including through the man gates. Clearly indicate the location of all man gates.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP!@-0160.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
10/01/2012 LEERAY HANLY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed No new work required on DP plan. If existing sewer or yard water needs to be altered then proper plans and permits to be secured.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/03/2012 FERNE RODRIGUEZ REJECT SHELF Completed