Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0159
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2012 | Any | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Active | |
| 10/03/2012 | ANY | NPPO | REVIEW | Active | |
| 10/03/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Active | |
| 10/03/2012 | ANY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Active | |
| 10/04/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | The proposed plan indicates an A-2 Occupancy with an occupant load over 100. This would require the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system and monitoring through a fire alarm system. In addition, the exit doors appear to be too close together for the "beverage service area". They would need to be at least 1/3 the diagonal distance apart in a fire sprinklered building or 1/2 the diagonal distance apart in a non-fire sprinklered building. |
| 10/04/2012 | RONALD BROWN | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/04/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/05/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Corbett Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0159 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 5, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan and certificate of occupancy. 2. It appears that there is a patio expansion on this non-conforming site therefore full code compliance for the site is required. 3. It appears that the proposed project is a change of use and may require full code compliance for the entire site. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan and certificate of occupancy. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.2.2 All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than fifty (50) feet to the inch. That said provide a site plan that meets this requirement. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0159, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.4 The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 As a general note list the gross area of the site on the plan by square footage and acreage. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 As a general note identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. The proposed use should be listed as "ALOCHOLIC BEVERAGE SERVICE "33", SUBJENT TO: SEC. 3.5.4.19.C 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a Provide the floor area for all buildings on this site. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation on the plan that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.11. This calculation should include the allowed floor area (FA) and the proposed floor area (FA). 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Until the last approved site plan is provided the requirements of a use expansion calculation cannot be verified. It appears that the "existing outdoor patio" shown on the plan was added sometime after 2006. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Unless each use will be a separate use under a separate C of O, the calculation should be based on COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE, Alcoholic Beverage Service, 1 space per 50 sq. ft. GFA. Based on a gross floor area, including the exterior patio, of 8,289 the required number of vehicle parking spaces would be 166. The parking calculation also needs to include the "EXISTING ADJACENT BUILDING" shown on the plan. There are a couple of options as far as reducing or eliminating required parking; a. Within the Greater Infill Incentive Subdistrict - Modification of Development Regulations (MDR) LUC Section 2.8.12.4.C.3 allows for Parking. a. Parking as required by Sec. 3.3.4 may be reduced up to twenty-five (25%) percent. Parking may be decreased by more than 25% per an agreement with the City's Parking Authority or through an Individual Parking Plan (Sec. 3.3.5.1) if the analysis and finding shows the proposed parking is adequate. (Ord. No. 10886, ยง5, 03/22/11) b. Accessible Parking and Bicycle Facilities. The number of accessible parking spaces required by the City of Tucson's adopted Building Code and bicycle facilities shall not be reduced or eliminated and shall be based on the number of motor vehicle parking spaces required prior to any modification. c. Parking may be provided either solely by one of the following options or a combination of the following options: i. On-site; ii. Off-site within one-quarter (1/4) of a mile of the project site through a shared parking agreement with the City; iii. On-street on the same side of the street as the proposed use up to five (5) spaces on a collector or arterial street per approval by the City's Transportation Department; and/or iv. An in-lieu fee per an agreement with the City's Parking Authority. b. Board of Adjustment for Variance to eliminate required parking. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a copy of the recorded parking agreement, as required per LUC Section 3.3.6.2.A.4 with your next submittal. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide documentation that there are no other users of the proposed parking lot. If there are other users that have legal right to use this parking lot, demonstrate that there are excess parking spaces to cover all users. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The provide site plan for the parking lot to the south does not match the most current Arial photo. There is some type of fenced area located in the southeast corner that appears to have deleted parking spaces. Provide a revised plan that shows the current layout and the correct number of vehicle parking spaces. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.c Based on LUC Section 3.4.3.4 and Section 3.4.5 Commercial Services Use Group, Restaurants/Bars, Over 5,000 sq. ft. GFA, ONE (1) TYPE A loading area is required. Provide a loading area calculation on the plan that includes the number required and provided. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE, Alcoholic Beverage Service, Short-term, 1 space per 2,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces, Long-term, 1 space per 12,000 sq. ft. GFA. Remove all references to Class 1 & 2 from the plan as they are no longer applicable. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a Short-term bicycle parking detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 and 3.3.9.3 are met. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a Long-term bicycle parking detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 and 3.3.9.4 are met. 20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 21. Provide the new "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp on all development package sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0159 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |