Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0155
Parcel: 14111365A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP12-0155
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/19/2012 CAGUILA1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/19/2012 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
09/24/2012 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/03/2012 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
10/08/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Cutting Edge Fabrication - Storage Yard Extension
Development Package (1st Review)
DP12-0155

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 8, 2012

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. There appears that the southwest open loading area has been enclosed and the expansion exceeds 25% requiring full code compliance for the entire site.

2. There are four (4) items that will need to be addressed on this development plan;
A. Sometime between 2008 and 2010 an open structure was added in the northeast corner of the site.
(a) Provide documentation that this structure was permitted and show it on this plan as existing.
(b) Show the structure as to be permitted on this plan and secure the required permits.

B. Sometime between 2008 and 2010 a structure (storage container) was added in the northeast corner of the site.
(a) Provide documentation that this structure was permitted and show it on this plan as existing.
(b) Show the structure as to be permitted on this plan and secure the required permits.

C. Sometime between 2008 and 2010 an open structure was added in the east side of the existing building
(a) Provide documentation that this structure was permitted and show it on this plan as existing.
(b) Show the structure as to be permitted on this plan and secure the required permits.

D. Sometime between 2010 and 2012 the southwest end of the building, shown on the last approved development plan as covered loading, was enclosed.
(a) Provide documentation that this enclosure was permitted and show it on this plan as existing. All calculations i.e. vehicle parking, bicycle parking, floor area ratio would need to be updated.
(b) Show the enclosure as to be permitted on this plan and secure the required permits. All calculations i.e. vehicle parking, bicycle parking, floor area ratio would need to be updated.

The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0:

1. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said add the subject to sections as listed in LUC Section 2.7.2.2.A.2.

2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a As the southwest corner of the building has been enclosed this should be included in the "BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE" calculation.

3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a & .b Under "GENERAL INFORMATION" "BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION" and "PARKING REQUIREMENTS" the square footage for the building is called out as 15,550 S.F., under "F.A.R. REQUIREMENTS" the building is called out as 23,550 S.F. clarify the difference.

4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide a building and lot area expansion calculation on the plan.

5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.A As this site is comprised of five (5) parcels - 141-11-365A, 141-11-3660, 141-11-3670, 141-11-3680, 141-11-3690 - a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of an approved Pima Country Combination Request form with your next submittal.

6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show the required Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT's) on the plan

7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle use area on the plan.

8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H Based on the most current aerial photos the "EXISTING WHEEL STOPS PER APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN" do not exist. Show these wheel stops as new.

9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As this review is full code the vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. See LUC Section 3.3.4.2 INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP for the required number of vehicle parking spaces. Until all structures are identified along with the use the required number of vehicle parking spaces cannot be determined.

10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d As this review is full code the bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. See LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B INDUSTRIAL USE GROUP for the required Short & Long term bicycle parking space. As Long-term bicycle parking is required provide a detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 & 3.3.9.4 are met

11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0155

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & approved Pima County Lot Combination.
10/09/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Landscaping requirements apply to expansion of existing development as follows:

" On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows:

" If the expansion is less than 25%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B

" If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. Verify expansion calculation per Zoning comments.

2. Provide previously approved landscape plans with next submittal

3. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

4. Additional comments may apply.
10/11/2012 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
10/12/2012 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
10/15/2012 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Denied Provide previously approved landscape plans with next submittal
10/15/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/16/2012 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed