Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP12-0153
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2013 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/16/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to provide vegetative groundcover for at least 50% of the street landscape border. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 2) Revise the landscape plan to provide screening per LUC 3.7.3. 3) Review DS 2-07.0 and provide required landscape plan content. 4) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C |
| 01/17/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Subject to Landscape Plan approval. |
| 12/24/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Adobe Surgery Center - Expansion Development Package (2nd Review) DP12-0153 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 24, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 08, 2013 The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Identify the sections corners, by number on the location map. D.S. 2-01.2.6 A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-01.3.4. 3. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide dimensions for the back-up spur shown at the north end of the proposed parking area. See LUC Section 3.3.6.6.D. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6 and clarified per LUC Section 3.3.9.5.B 4' clear is required between racks the detail shows 4' on center. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The Short-term bicycle parking calculation is not correct. The provided shows 3 provided when you are providing 6, see LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.4. 6. Once the above comments have been addressed Zoning is will to provide an over the counter review. Please call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0153 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 12/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The revised site drawing indicates that a private manhole is included as part of the building sewer. Provide the rim elevation for this manhole and compare it to the first floor elevation for the building addition. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson and, if a backwater valve is required, note the requirement on the drawing. |