Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0153
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/12/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide curb ramps and detectable warning strips on both ends of the newly identified marked crossing. 2. Insure that all new accessible slopes comply with ICC A117.1, 403.3; 5% max running and 2% max cross. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/19/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/25/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/27/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Adobe Surgery Center - Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0153 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 25, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 08, 2013 The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 2. D.S. 2-01.2.6 A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-01.3.4. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers, DP12-0153 & C9-86-66, adjacent to the title block on all development package sheets. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.3 Provide a copy of the re-zoning conditions and amended re-zoning conditions with the next submittal. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the proposed use should be listed as "MEDICAL SERVICE - OUTPATIENT "30", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.4.8.B". 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation the meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.11. This calculation should include the allowed Floor Area (FA) and the proposed Floor Area (FA). 7. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C Provide the following information for the Wyatt Drive right-of-way; right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. That said the zoning shown east of Wyatt Drive is not correct. This zoning should be shown as "PAD 16". 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide dimensions for the back-up spur shown at the north end of the proposed parking area. See LUC Section 3.3.6.6.D. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 There is a "NEW COVERED EXIT" shown along the west side of the existing building, adjacent to the western most PAAL. Per LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.1.a a one (1) foot setback is required to this structure from the PAAL. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a detail for the short-term bicycle parking that shows how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B are met. Ribbon style racks are not an acceptable style of rack. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a detail for the long-term bicycle parking that shows how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4 are met. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 14. Provide the new "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp on all development package sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0153 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & re-zoning conditions. |
| 10/08/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 10/08/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a landscape plan and a native plant preservation plan. |
| 10/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer d. the location of the building connection to the public sewer e. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts f. the first floor elevation for the building addition Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | REJECT SHELF | Completed |