Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP12-0141
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/24/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/29/2012 | GBONILL1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | |
| 08/30/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/05/2012 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Fireflow required will be 1,000 GPM at 20psi residual pressure. Fire hydrants shall be located that no point of a structure is further than 400 feet from a hydrant measured from an approved route around the building. Fire Hydrant locations will be determined at time of submittal to Tucson Water for improvements. |
| 09/10/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Hacienda at Wrightstown Development Package/Rezoning (1st Review) DP12-0141 & C9-12-10 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 11, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 23, 2013 The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 2. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP12-0141 & C9-12-11 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.3 Once available list the rezoning conditions on the plan. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said revise General Note 4 to read "FAMILY DWELLING "G", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.7.1.E, .F, .G, AND .H." 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.7 The annexation number listed in General Note 8 is not correct. Either revise the note to show annexation case number 3839 or remove the note. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.B Lot 1 shows "004 SF", provide the correct square footage. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.I There is a note on the plan that states "10' GAS AND ELEC. EASEMENT PER DKT 675, PG 143 TO BE DEDICATED BY FINAL PLAT OT C.O.T. AS ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY". Show the east property in what will be the new location after dedication. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.I As the re-zoning conditions have not been determined be aware that re-zonings generally required dedication of right-of-way (ROW) along Major Streets and Routes. Wrightstown Road is designated as an Arterial street with a future ROW of 120' on the COT Major Streets and Routes map. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.J If ROW dedication is not required by the re-zoning show the future ROW line, sidewalk, curb and SVT's on the plan. The project needs to be designed to meet the future ROW requirements. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.J Provide documentation from COT Traffic that supports that no ROW will be taken along the north property line. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Provide a typical setback detail on the plan. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O There are dashed lines on along each interior lot line, clarify what these lines are for. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.T Show the required sidewalk along the proposed street. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.U Once the rezoning conditions are available indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.V For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 17. Provide a plot plan for lot 12 showing how the existing house meets the requirements of an R-1 zoned parcel on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0141 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 09/11/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0141 THE HACIENDA @ WRIGHTSTOWN/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: September 10, 2012 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. On the Sitemap, shade in the project area. 2. Correct the section corners on the Sitemap. 3. On the Sitemap, change 35916 to 35016 and change 41022 (eastern most) to 41083. 4. Label the new interior street name on the Final Plat. Note: the suffix of the new name must be either Court or Place since it is a cul-de-sac. |
| 09/11/2012 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Sherry Hyde Senior Property Technician Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: 9/11/12 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding DP12-0141 HACIENDA AT WRIGHTSTOWN TENTATIVE PLAT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " ALL HATCHING, STIPPLING, STRIPING ETC. MUST BE REMOVED IN THE FINAL PLAT, UNLESS ANOTHER AGENCY REQUIRES IT. IF SO, ALL LETTERING MUST HAVE THE HATCHING, ETC. CUT AWAY SO THEY ARE LEGIBLE. " ALL STREETS MUST BE NAMED IN THE FINAL PLAT, AND HAVE DIMENSIONS, BEARINGS AND CURVE DATA. " ALL ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS SHOULD BE NAMED, WITH MAP AND PLAT IN THE APPROPRIATE AREAS AROUND THE SUBDIVISION. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 09/11/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 09/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meters b. the location of the fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meters (if planned) Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 09/19/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include an accessible statement to the effect that all requirements of the Inclusive Home Design Ordinance #10463 shall be incorporated. |
| 09/24/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DP12-0141 The Tentative Plat/Development Package cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following comments. 1. The rezoning case must be approved before the development package may be approved. Provide the rezoning conditions and make any necessary revisions to comply with the approved conditions. Note that additional comments may be forthcoming after the rezoning conditions have been approved. 2. Clarify general notes 24 and 27 on sheet 1. Development Standard 9-04 has been renumbered and is currently listed as "Reserved." Please reference a current development standard. 3. Clarify general note 25 which refers to HDZ. The site is not within the Hillside Development Zone. 4. Sheet 1 indicates the right-of-way is 75 feet wide and the north property line is both existing and future. The future right-of-way width is 120 feet per the Major Streets and Routes plan. Provide an explanation and revise as necessary. 5. Clearly show sidewalks along all street frontages in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.3.3.A. Sidewalks and curbs must be provided along the new street and along the two existing roadways adjacent to the project. 6. Show surrounding ground surface in the details for the interior drainage channel and weir in details C and D on sheet C4. 7. Clarify the configuration of the basin. Development Standard 10-01.4.3.1 limits the use of structures such as retaining walls to no more than 35 per cent of the basin perimeter. Ensure the structural and soils reports provide discussion of the requirements for the wall footing within the area subject to inundation. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 09/24/2012 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and recommends its approval. |
| 09/24/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 September 20, 2012 To: KEN PERRY, P.E. PERRY ENGINERING, LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: THE HACIENDA AT WRIGHTSTOWN Tent Plan - 1st submittal DP12-0141 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan. |
| 09/24/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to comply with any conditions of the proposed rezoning. DS 1-07 2) Revise the plans to comply with DS 10-01.0 Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater. Slopes for basins less than three feet are to be no steeper than 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected. DS 10-01.4 3) Revise sheet P-1 to provide the street landscape border in the Common Area A, adjacent to Lot 12. LUC Table 3.7.2-I |
| 09/24/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | This project/plat is approved for solid waste and recycle collection service. ES collections has been made aware the project is underway. Jeff |
| 09/24/2012 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: HACIENDA AT WRIGHTSTOWN DP-12-0141 AND C9-12-11 Tucson Electric Power (TEP) has no objection to the Tentative Plat submitted for review on August 24, 2012. There are existing electric facilities that appear to be in conflict within the subdivision plat. Any costs associated with the relocation of TEP facilities will be borne by the Developer. If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQW603 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 09/25/2012 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | No comments. |
| 09/25/2012 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP12-0141 Mahalo Properties - Wrightstown Rd. () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-12-11 Mahalo Properties -Wrightstown Rd. NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Wrightstown Neighborhood Plan and the General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: Sept. 24, 2012 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section DP12 0141 - Mahalo Properties - Wrightstown Road Sept. 25, 2012 Based on the applicant's request; a concurrent review is in process for Development Plan 12-0141 and Rezoning Case C9-12-11, which is to change the site's land use zone from RX-1 to R-1 to allow a residential subdivision with 17 lots at a density of 3.7 units per acres. Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan; rezoning case C9-12-11 must be approved by Mayor and Council. Development plan DP12-0141 shall be required to be in full compliance with all of C9-12-11 rezoning conditions. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with rezoning case C9-12-11, as approved by Mayor and Council. 2. Prior to development plan resubmittal, add to the general notes of the development plan all rezoning conditions, verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council. 3. Upon resubmittal of development plan that is in compliance with rezoning case C9-12-11, staff will be able to complete a full review which may include new/revised comments. |
| 09/25/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/25/2012 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/25/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 09/26/2012 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed. Resubmittal will be required. Plans may be picked up at the permit counter. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/05/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 09/26/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |