Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0132
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2013 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/07/2013 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E., Engineering and Floodplain Review SUBJECT: Park Avenue Housing Campus Acquisitions LOCATION: T14S, R14E, SECTION 07 ACTIVITY: DP12-0132 The revised Development Package submittal has been re-reviewed after further discussions with the consultant regarding easements and license agreements. Meeting was held 7JAN13 to go over outstanding items. Please address the remaining Engineering items as a CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of DP12-0132. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-01.2 (Admin Manual Sec.2-06.3): Sheets 7-14 of the hard copy resubmittal plan sets, which were submitted with the electronic set, are missing data. Please provide new hard copy(ies) of the resubmittal, assuring all layers are "turned on" and sheet numbers, detail callouts, title block descriptions, keynotes, etc are shown on all sheets. 2) DS 2-01.3.8.B: Status of the easements and license agreements and remaining comments were discussed in the recent meeting. The remaining easement-related comments are minor and therefore conditional approval is recommended. Please address the following remaining minor clarifications for the easements: A) Revise the Easement Note in box at lower portion of sheet 15; replace "… at as-built stage" with "… prior to permit issuance". B) For notations on planview sheets (ie 2 notations on sheet 8) clarify / add that the License Agreement will be "… on file with the City of Tucson …". C) Per previous meetings with TDOT, the easements for public access on additional access areas for the wider alley width, shall be clarified with the resubmittal of the PIA plans to show necessary public access easements. Any associated access easements with sequence numbers shall be shown on as-builts as well. Please acknowledge this comment in response letter, to address this comment for the Engineering Review approval of the Development Package. 3) Tucson Code Sec.26-6.2, DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N: On sheet 9, limits of 100-year floodplain need to be clarified for proposed conditions such that the main proposed structure, which has a residential component, is not with the jurisdictional floodplain limits. As discussed in the recent meeting, label 100-year floodplain limits as "proposed" on planview, and assure that proposed residential structure and location of portion of solid waste pick-up landing is outside of floodplain. In response letter, state whether this will be clarified in the resubmittal, or with a future Tier 1 Revision, or at as-built stage. 4) Regarding proposed alley design, address the remaining comments: A) DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.1: Clarify how areas of SVT's drawn at parking structure entrance will be clear of obstructions (a large portion of the northwest parking stall on bank property is shown within newly drawn SVT for northbound traffic in alley approaching parking structure exit area). B) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.X: In response letter, state which sheet where no-parking signs in alley are labeled on planview, per previous meetings' discussions. FURTHER DISCUSSION & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: 5) Per meeting discussion, the lot combo request is expected to be submitted since land has closed. Zoning shall determine sufficiency of lot combo status for the Development Package. A revised Development Plan Package with response letter is required and may be reviewed at the counter or in a meeting. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4934 or elizabeth.leibold@tucsonaz.gov Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 01/07/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The revised drawings are incomplete and have insufficient information to evaluate the changes. Previous comments: 1. Comment not addressed. Provide justification for the size of the grease waste sewer. 2. Comment not addressed. Identify the responsible party for a gravity grease interceptor that could conceivably be supporting multiple tenants. |
| 01/08/2013 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0132 PARK AVE HOUSING/REVISED SITE DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DATE: January 8, 2013 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Include all tax codes under Project Data. |
| 01/08/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | Review has been completed. Revisions are required. |
| 01/14/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Electronic version only, hard copies received have multiple errors. |
| 12/21/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | See e-mail discussion in SIRE |
| 12/21/2012 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/24/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Park Avenue Housing Development Package (3rd Review) DP12-0132 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 24, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.A As this proposed project is located on three (3) parcels and a lot combination will be required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request Form with your next submittal. 3. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L There is a proposed "NEW 20' X 14' ELECTRICAL EASEMENT" shown on sheet 8, provide the sequence number on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0132 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/28/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |