Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - DP12-0132
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/19/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | ES Solid Waste and Recycling comments from review 1 have been addressed in Revision 2. This project is approved for Solid waste and Recycle. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 10/22/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Park Avenue Housing Development Package (2nd Review) DP12-0132 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B There is a "5' COMMUNICAITON EASEMENT PER DKT 2716, PG 159 TO BE ABANDONED" shown on sheet 8. This easement will need to abandoned prior to approval of this development package. 2. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.A As this proposed project is located on three (3) parcels and a lot combination will be required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request Form with your next submittal. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Zoning acknowledges that you wish to use Section C-5.b.iv of the Main Gate UOD and have the proposed Short and long term Bicycle parking design reviewed and approved by the Director. Contact Adam Smith for this review at 520-837-6951 or Adam.Smith@tucsonaz.gov. Provide documentation that this review has been approved with your next submittal. 4. This comment was not fully addressed Demonstrate how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4.B.3 & 3.3.9.4.D are met. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Show the location of the Long-term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail the shows how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4 are met 5. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L There is a proposed "NEW 20' X 14' ELECTRICAL EASEMENT" shown on sheet 8, provide the sequence number on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0132 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & Director review and approval of Short & Long term bicycle parking design. |
| 10/23/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 10/24/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2012 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0132 PARK AVE HOUSING/REVISED SITE DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DATE: October 24, 2012 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Note: Include all tax codes under Project Data. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. |
| 10/24/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | DESIGN EXAMINER | REVIEW | Approved | Design Professional comments from review 1 have been addressed in Revision 2. This project *is approved* relative to CDRC Design Professional's review. |
| 10/25/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide justification for the size of the grease waste sewer. 2. Comment not addressed. Identify the responsible party for a gravity grease interceptor that could conceivably be supporting multiple tenants. |
| 10/30/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Approved, subject to TDOT City Engineer approval of improvements in the sidewalk area. |
| 10/30/2012 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Elizabeth Leibold P.E., Engineering and Floodplain Review, 10/30/2012, SUBJECT: Park Avenue Housing Campus Acquisitions DP12-0132, T14S, R14E, SECTION 07 RECEIVED: Development Package The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the remaining comments. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Package where the revisions were made: BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 1. Provide status of lot combo required for this project. 2. All existing onsite easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements onsite will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, abandonment of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided (D.S. 2-01.3.8.B). Abandonment documents shall be provided for review and the easement shall be removed from the plans. Provide a recent Title Report. 3. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks (D.S. 2-01.3.8.C). Provide all missing information. 4. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private (D.S. 2-01.3.9.L). This also applies to the area described in Keynote #11 on Sheet 8 of 21. Clarify if an easement is needed for the generator pad. Additionally, the proposed easement, described in Keynote #12 on Sheet 8 of 21, shall be processed and the recordation information shall be provided on the plan. Permitting/General Notes: 5. Since the Storm Sewer is mainly in the public right of way, the contact shall be TDOT Permits and Codes and possibly Streets Maintenance. Contact TDOT for additional information and revise the contact information as needed. Site Plan: 6. Are there and storm drainage facilities on Park Avenue? (D.S. 2-01.3.8.F.). If yes, show them. 7. Provide the dimensions all proposed onsite and offsite sidewalks as required by (D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.4). Grading Plan: 8. Show the driveway widths and curb radii. 9. According to D.S. 11-01.9.0, the minimum cut or fill setback shall be 2' from the parcel line. Verify compliance with this requirement. Label adjacent existing contour lines. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4934 or elizabeth.leibold@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package and comprehensive response letter. |
| 10/30/2012 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | REVISED COMMENTS: 2NOV12 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E., Engineering and Floodplain Review SUBJECT: Park Avenue Housing Campus Acquisitions LOCATION: T14S, R14E, SECTION 07 ACTIVITY: DP12-0132 The revised Development Package submittal has been re-reviewed after further discussions with the consultant. Engineering review is sufficient at this time for building plan submittal (applicant would be proceeding at risk if there are any conflicts in easements or other Title Report items). Please note that the Title Report will need to be submitted for Engineering review before consideration of changing from Denied to Approved for Engineering Review status. Please address the remaining comments. Prepare a detailed response that explains the response or revisions that were made and reference the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Package where the revisions were made: BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 1) Provide status of lot combo required for this project. 2) DS 2-01.3.8.B: Easement related comments: A) Provide a recent Title Report. B) Abandonment of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. Abandonment documents shall be provided for review and the easement shall be removed from the plans. C) All proposed easements shall be processed and the recordation information shall be provided on the plan. Provide the required easement sequence number for the required TEP easement area. GRADING PLAN: 3) DS 11-01.9: Show offsite grading construction easement for proposed improvements on south portion of project. FURTHER DISCUSSION: 4) Clarify objective in response letter. If objective is to obtain an approved Development Plan only, without construction (no permit issuance), then the package may be approvable once lot combo is addressed and the Title Report is submitted, reviewed, and found acceptable. The Development Package may be resubmitted with sequence numbers at a later date for grading / construction permitting. A revised Development Plan Package, Title Report, and comprehensive response letter is required for resubmittal. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4934 or elizabeth.leibold@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/31/2012 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 10/31/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 October 31, 2012 To: GRENIER ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: PARK AVENUE HOUSING Development Plan - 2nd submittal DP12-0132 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan. |
| 11/01/2012 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | This review has been completed. Revisions are required. |
| 11/01/2012 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Approved | I have reviewed the project for Landscape and Irrigation and have no comments. Nice job. |
| 11/01/2012 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved |