Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0120
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
08/09/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP12-0120 and T12CM04479 3501 N Mountain Ave Proposed Administrative Office TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 9, 2012 DUE DATE: August 12, 2012 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with DS 2-01 requirements and format. While this proposed expansion does not exceed a greater than cumulative 25% expansion, all new changes to the site must be comply with current code requirements. Each Review agency will provide comments based on the applicable codes. Zoning has reviewed the site plan for compliance as depicted on the plan and did not reviewed with the alternative design. If the alternative design is to be used it must be demonstrated on the site plan all compliance with Development standards as well as any LUC requirements can be met. 2. DS 2-01.3.2.E and DS 2-01.3.5 - Page number and number of pages must be listed in the title block of all plan sheets. The page index on the cover sheet should include the page number of sheet in the package. 3. DS 2-01.3.7.A.1 - On the site plan sheet A1.0, under the Land use code analysis, list the development designator "DD 29" next to the zoning info. The following information that is associated with the DD 29 includes the, allowed and proposed building height, allowed and proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR), Required and Actual Site Area, Perimeter Yard indicator "DD". These development criteria must be added as requested. A general restriction also applies to this site as listed in LUC section 2.5.3.6.B - List the LUC section number in the zoning section of the text block. 4. DS 2-01.3.7 A.4 - Identify the existing use of the property. 5. DS 2-10.3.7.A.6.b - List the overlay zones that are applicable to this site. And state that the site has been designed to comply with the requirements of the overlay zone. The applicable overlay zone is the Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone LUC Section 2.8.3. 6. DS 2-10.3.7.A.9.a-.d - List the information related to the sections listed. It is acknowledged that some are listed. List the ones that may be missing. 7. DS 2-01.3.7.B.1.a - add the note to the site plan as indicated in this development standard. 8. DS 2-01.3.8.A and DS 2-01.3.9 - Provide the site boundary perimeter information of this lot, including bearing in degree, minutes and seconds. (It's acknowledged that the lot dimensions are labeled.) The line work depicting the property line must be revised to a heavier or darker line for legibility. Also the property line as drawn on the plan does not match the information on the assessors map. The Assessor's map depicts a radius at the southeast corner of the property, the site plan depicts a square corner. 9. DS 2-01.3.8.B - All easements shall be drawn and labeled on the site plan. The recordation information, width (Area), and purpose of the easement must be labeled. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.F - Label the zoning classifications adjacent to the south and west of this site. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d - The location of the long term bicycle parking facilities could not be verified. Demonstrate on the site plan how the requirements for long term bicycle parking will be met. The location, number of facilities, dimensions, etc must be depicted on the plan. A detail drawing that provides the requested information can be added to the plan and should include the design dimensions. Also include the number of required Long Term Facilities in the Parking Required text block. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.O - This site must comply with the building setbacks based on Major Streets and Routes setbacks. Mountain Ave is listed as a collector street on the Major Streets and Routes Map and the ADT is considered to be 1,000+. The building setback along Mountain Ave is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the back of future curb location. Greenlee by default because of Mountain is also required to meet the developing area setback requirements but would be based on an ADT of 140 to 1,000. The building setback from Greenlee will be based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the nearest edge of travel lane. Revise and/or add the Greenlee and Mountain street perimeter building setbacks based on the info above. 13. DS 2-01.3.9.Q - list the overall building height of the existing building as well as the height of the new structure. The height should be labeled on the building footprints on the site plan. 14. DS 2-01.3.9.R - Add a 4-foot wide concrete sidewalk between the parking spaces and the building along the north side of the main building. Accessible ramps will also have to be provided from accessible parking spaces. 15. DS 2-01.3.9.T - It is not clear if Engineering will require a concrete sidewalk along the Greenlee street frontage. If the request for a sidewalk is made by Engineering, a sidewalk from the building to the Greenlee Street sidewalk will have to be provided. 16. DS 2-01.3.9.W - If applicable to this project, indicate the locations, type and size of any freestanding signs proposed for this development. 17. DS 2-01.3.9.X - Refer to the landscape review comments for landscape buffers and screening requirements. 18. This site has a cell tower use on the northwest side of the building. Add to the site plan all relevant information for the cell tower use. It should include the zoning development criteria, date of the cell tower approval and documentation of the cell tower Special Exception approval. Contact Michael Wyneken for this information. His contact info is as follows: Michael.Wyneken@tucsonaz.gov and his phone no. is 837-4955. 19. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the response to these zoning comments and revisions to the site plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and additional requested documents. |
08/17/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide previous approved landscape plan for reference. 2. Note: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. 3. Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C 4. Ensure that all zoning comments and concerns are addressed 5. Additional comments may apply |
08/22/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property. Photographs of the site are necessary for NPPO approval per DS 2-15.2.0.C |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
08/24/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |