Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0101
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/06/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The space just west of the 11' wide Van Accessible parking space does not have a curb surround. It was an aisle for the previous accessible parking space and was indicated with parking stripes. Retain these stripes and show the existing curb line back to the face of the exiting sidewalk ramp. 2. Detectable warning strips are not required at accessible parking aisles. These areas are safe zones. 3. Provide concrete wheel stops as required by zoning. Reference zoning comments. 4. Relocate the accessible parking sign post within the curb line, not in the parking area. 5. The correct scale of the site plan is 1"=10'-0", not 1/16" per foot. Please correct. 6. Please provide a dimension on the depth of the accessible parking spaces. 7. Please provide a width dimension on the new curb ramp. END OF COMMENTS |
| 09/17/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: McDonald's - 2525 S. Craycroft Road Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0101 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 14, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The development package should be a separate submittal from the building plan. The plans can run concurrently. The development package requires its own cover sheet and the page numbering should be separate. 2. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 3. D.S. 2-01.2.2 All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than fifty (50) feet to the inch. That said provide a development package that meets this requirement. The site plan provided is drawn at an architectural scale. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.1 Provide a cover sheet for the development package that provides the following information; 5. D.S. 2-01.3.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provide on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.1 All General notes should be provided on the cover sheet. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E the page number and number of pages should be for the development package only. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0101, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.4 The location map shown on sheet CV does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-01.3.4. Review D.S. 2-01.3.4 and provide a location map on the cover sheet for the development package. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.1 Provide a general note stating "EXISTING ZONING C-2." 11. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Provide a general note that identifies the existing use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code (LUC) sections each proposed use is subject to. (RESTAURANT FAST FOOD) is not a use listed in the LUC. The use should be listed as "FOOD SERVICE "30", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.4.6.C AND SEC. 3.5.13.5". 12. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general notes stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 13. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation the meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.11. This calculation should provide the allowed floor area (FA) and the proposed floor area (FA). 14. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c As this project proposes a small expansion of floor area provide a building expansion calculation on the plan. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B Provide the recordation information for the "ELECTRICAL EASEMENT" shown in the northeast corner of the plan. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.2 Show existing and if applicable future sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 As a parking lot restripe is proposed provide access lane and parking area access lane width dimensions for all proposed and existing access lane and parking area access lanes this includes the northern most drive thru lane. 20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.5 There is a 12' dimension that appears to dimension the drive thru directly east of the building. There is nothing shown on the drawings at the west end of this dimension. 21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As a parking lot restripe is proposed provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled on the plan. Provide a "A PARKING ANGLE" dimension for the proposed angled parking. 22. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The "C SPACE DEPTH" "18'"shown only works for 90 degree parking. Until the angled parking dimension is provided the requirement cannot be verified. Additional comments may be forth coming. 23. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a There is a vehicle parking space shown at the northwest corner of the site that appears to encroach into an existing site wall. Demonstrate on the plan how removal/relocating of the wall will be addressed. 24. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Wheel stops maybe required for the vehicle parking shown just south of the building. Until the sidewalk width dimension is provided, see comment 29, this requirement cannot be verified. 25. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The provided vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. Based on "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES #5 there is 4,900 sq. ft. of gross floor area (GFA), the parking calculation on shows 4,100 sq. ft. Clarify which number is correct. 26. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per LUC 3.3.8.2.B COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Communications, the required Short-term Bicycle parking is 2, and the required Long-term Bicycle parking is based on 1 space per 12,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. That said the minimum required for Short & Long term bicycle parking is two (2) spaces each. Provide a bicycle parking space calculation that provides the number required and provided for both Short & Long term bicycle parking. 27. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Until the last approved site plan is provide the bicycle parking requirement cannot be verified. If bicycle parking was shown on the last approved site plan show the bicycle parking on this plan. 28. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building 29. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide a width dimension for all sidewalks shown on the plan. 30. D.S. 2-01.3.9.W All proposed signage shown on sheets SD.1 & SD,2 will require separate permits. Provided a note on the plan stating that "ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT." 31. Under "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES" there are several references to "LAND USE CODE: 2030". Clarify what this reference is to as there no COT Land Use Code 2030. 32. Provide the new "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp on all development package sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0101 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, copy of the last approved site plan. |
| 09/18/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/01/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Completed | See Landscape comments. |
| 10/01/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: URS Corporation DATE: October 1, 2012 1255 Broad St., Ste. 201 Clifton, NJ, 07013 Subject: McDonalds, 2525 S. Craycroft Rd. Development Package, DP12-0101 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 24 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package and Drainage Statement The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. A DP shall be re-submitted addressing the requirements listed in the City of Tucson Development Standards 2-01.0. The URL to the Dev. Stds and other sites that will be helpful for review are: " http://maps.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/index.html " http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/imported/plans/all/msr.pdf " http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Development_Stds.pdf " http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/pro/devactionsrch.jsp Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/2525 S. Craycroft Rd._DP_2-01.0 |
| 10/02/2012 | LEERAY HANLY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/03/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The development plan package is a separate submittal from the building plan. The development package requires its own cover sheet and information specified in Development Standard 2-01.0. 2. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is ten thousand (10,000) square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: " If the expansion is less than 50%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B " If the expansion is 50% or greater, or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. 3. Provide the following information if necessary: " Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. " Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material. 4. Note: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B 5. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed 6. Additional comments may apply |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/19/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | REJECT SHELF | Completed |