Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0100
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/09/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/11/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/25/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide previous approved site and landscape plans for reference. 2. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is ten thousand (10,000) square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: 3. If the expansion is less than 50%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B 4. If the expansion is 50% or greater, or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. 5. provide both the proper and common name of existing vegetation to remain in place. 6. Indicate the sight visibility triangles for all site access drives DS.2-01.3.9.H.2. Note: All landscaping and screening must comply with the sight visibility requirements of Development Standard 3-01.0. Plant materials located within sight visibility triangles should consist of ground cover or low growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty (30) inches. 7. Ensure that all zoning comments and concerns are addressed 8. Additional comments may apply |
| 07/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer d. the location of the building connection to the public sewer e. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts f. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 07/26/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/30/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | After discussion with client plans are to be resubmitted with full code compliance. No comments will be generated at this time. |
| 07/31/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET T1.1 1. The Comprehensive Site Plan does not match the Site Plan on Sheet C1.1. Please reconcile. SHEET C1.1 2. Please provide a large scale detail of the parking layout and show all accessible requirements such as: dimensions, grade slopes, concrete wheel stop, curb ramp. a. Please delete the detectable warning stip at the curb ramp. It is not required at this location. b. Show the slope of the ramp c. Show all ramp dimensions including the top landing. d. Make the accessible parking space "Van Accessible, 11'-0" wide. 3. Replace the concrete wheel stop. Reference zoning requirements. 4. Insure all new concrete accessible routes comply with ICC A 117.1, 403.3, max running slope of 5% and max cross lopes of 2%. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/02/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Per a discussion with the applicant David Garcia, RA this plan is being pulled from review prior to finishing my 1st submittal review due to the amount of errors that have already been found by Zoning and Engineering. The applicant will resubmit the plans after revising it to be full code compliant due to greater than 25% expansion. DP Package is a full code complaint review per the Zoning Section. Verify that all aspects of DS Sec.2-01 have been met. Provide a drainage report that discusses the adjacent SFHA Zone AE along Van Burn that effect the property along the western property line. Verify FFE of both the existing and proposed building. Verify existing and future right of way information with existing and future curb/sidewalk locations along with SVTs. The DP document must clearly delineate the limits of the 100 year floodplain and the plan must be stamped by a civil engineer for drainage aspects only. Verify access to the refuse enclosure if Zoning is requiring a barrier from the property to the existing alley. JG |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/14/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |