Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0099
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/05/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | |
| 07/09/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/09/2012 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/12/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 26, 2012 SUBJECT: Discount Cab Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Chuck Meyer, RA LOCATION: 829 W Silverlake Rd, T14S R13E 2 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0099 and T12OT01005 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Floodplain Use Permit, Drainage Report (Greg Carlson Engineering LLC, 02JUL12) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Greg Carlson Engineering LLC, 01JUL12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0099) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.5: Revise the development plan document and "Sheet Index" to include the landscape, irrigation and water harvesting sheets. 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to accurately label and dimension the future curb/sidewalk location based on the MS&R Plan for a 100-foot right-of-way. Label and dimension the future sight visibility triangles in plan view. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.42: Revise the development plan document to label Silverlake Road as a "Collector MS&R." 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to provide a 2.5-foot overhang from the proposed parking stalls and the 6-foot chain link fence adjacent to the eastside of the new building. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension a 1-foot separation from the proposed company parking canopy and the required 24-foot PAAL width along the north side of the structure. 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to dimension the parking spaces under the proposed parking canopy. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the development plan document to verify that the area on site called out as "Existing Chip-Seal" meets the surfacing requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.9.3. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise Sheet 4 to call out the water harvesting area adjacent to the eastside of the existing building. Label General Note #17 in plan view. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Per DS Sec.10-02.10.3.4 revise the development plan document and detail to show that the portion of the proposed storm drain system that extends into the public right-of-way (Mission View Wash) is constructed out of reinforced concrete with the minimum diameter of 18-inches. Provide a manhole at the junction between RCP and HDPE or revise the entire stretch of storm drain to be constructed out of reinforced concrete. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise the development plan document to provide scour/erosion protection at the outlet end of the proposed 18-inch RCP into Mission View Wash to prevent slope erosion. Verify the minimum limits of disturbance for mitigation purposes. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise Sheet 3 of the development plan document to correctly label Sheet 5 (not 4) for the Catch Basin & Pipe Detail reference. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.4: Revise Sheet 3 of the development plan document to label the required finish floor elevation for the new building. It is acknowledged that the FFE is shown on Sheets 4 and 5 however provide the label on the overall master site plan sheet. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document to provide the minimum 5-foot width of sidewalk within the right-of-way of Silverlake Road per DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A. The plan set shows existing sidewalk at 3.8-feet which does not meet the 5-foot requirement due to a full code compliant submittal. 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise General Note #3 on Sheet 3 to reference the proposed COT/PC Standard Detail for Public Improvement #207 for the proposed modified curb access ramp. 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and provide a detail for the refuse enclosure to provide all aspect for construction purposes. The detail must match DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3b for the required enclosure walls with gates, minimum compressive strength for the concrete, required bollard locations, dimensions for 10'x10' clear area, etc. 18) A right-of-way use permit application will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way and for the proposed drainage infrastructure that is proposed into the Mission View Wash. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE REPORT: 19) DS Sec.9-06.2.1: All proposed development within property that includes any Regulated Area as defined in Development Standard 9-06.2.2 shall identify and delineate the Regulated Areas and the Protected Riparian Area. The Regulated Areas on this site are the existing 100-year floodplain limit, specifically the encroachment into the Mission View Wash for the storm drain outlet. Revise the development plan document, specifically the Landscape Plan, to provide the 100-year floodplain information (regulatory limits) on the plant inventory and landscape/mitigation plans. 20) DS Sec.9-06.2.5.B: The project proposes encroachment (storm drain outlet with erosion protection) within the Regulated Areas of the Mission View Wash and will require a Environmental Resource Report (ERR) to demonstrate conformance with DS Sec.9-06 and Chapter 29 of the Tucson Code. The Environmental Resource Report must include all items (a-x) within this section. SWPPP: 21) Per City of Tucson Code Ordinance 10209, Chapter 26 Section 26-42.2: The SWPPP exhibits must be signed and sealed by the engineer of record, revise. "For land disturbing activities that fall under the jurisdiction of this Article, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and certified by an engineer, or a landscape architect and submitted along with the application for a grading permit to the City of Tucson Development Services Department" 22) Part III.C.3.b: Show areas of soil disturbance and areas that will not be disturbed. This includes the area around the storm drain outlet into Mission View Wash. Label all sediment protection around all disturbed areas to prevent excess from entering Mission View Wash. 23) Part III.C.3.j: Specify existing vegetated areas (trees, brush, etc.) and boundaries of environmentally sensitive areas and buffer zones that are to be preserved. Refer to Landscape Plan for required re-vegetation requirements. 24) Part IV.B.1: If culverts are present on-site, describe measures that will be used to minimize erosion at and around the culvert(s). Clarify inlet and outlet protection for the proposed storm drain during construction. 25) Part IV.B.1: Describe measures for preventing and responding to spill, including spill notification requirements. Provide the emergency contact information (name and telephone number) for Pima County and AZ Department of Environmental Quality on the exhibits. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and ERR that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 07/19/2012 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Please indicate on plan the nearest fire hydrant on public street. Two fire hydrants are required and only one is shown as proposed. The number of hydrants is based on Appendix B and C of the 2006 IFC. The required fire flow is 2,250 GPM for 2 hours at 20psi residual pressure based on Type IIB construction and a proprosed 12,000 square foot building. Appendix C requires 2 fire hydrants for the 2,250 GPM fire flow. |
| 07/25/2012 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 07/26/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Discount Cab Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0099 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 26, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This development package was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.), Land Use Code (LUC). 2. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 4, 2013 The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.2.4 Provide a title block in the lower right quadrant of the landscape, irrigation and water harvesting sheets. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E The landscape, irrigation and water harvesting sheets should have the page number and number of sheets within the title block. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E The total number of sheets should include the landscape, irrigation and water harvesting sheets. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP12-0099. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.5 The "SHEET INDEX" located on sheet 1 should include the landscape, irrigation and water harvesting sheets. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 As the curb shown along Silverlake Road is not at the future curb location per the COT MS&R show the future curb and future sight visibility triangles on the plan. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 The area on site called out a "EXISTING CHIP-SEAL" needs to meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.9.3. Add a note stating this. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Clarify what the "T-SHPED TURNAROUND PER DS 3-01.0" is for. Development Standard 3-01.0 is for Street Development. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Remove all reference to "CLASS 1, CLASS 2" from all sheets as they are not applicable. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4 Long-term Bicycle Parking is met. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Under "GENERAL NOTES (SITE PLAN) SETBACKS AND SCREENING" the street perimeter yard is not correct. Per a determination by the COT Zoning administrator any proposed project that borders a street designated on the COT MS& R maps is considered developing area. That said the street perimeter yard for this project is based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.b ADT of 1,000 or greater - 21 feet or the height (H) of the proposed exterior building wall, which ever is greatest. Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0099 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 07/30/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 3/6 1. As there are no architectural drawings included with this submittal package, please provide a large scale detail of the concrete ramp to the existing building entrance showing all accessibility requirements such as; dimensions, grade elevations, landings, handrails, clearances and slopes. a. Provide a handrail elevation also showing all accessible requirements. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/31/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/01/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8.4.2 2) All tentative plats, development plans, site plans, plot plans or other plans providing for approval of development within property that includes any Regulated Area as defined in Development Standard 9-06.2.2.A shall identify and delineate the Regulated Areas and the Protected Riparian Area on the property. The boundary of the Regulated Area and the Protected Riparian Area should be clearly depicted on applicable submittal documents. DS 9-06.2.4 3) Revise the Water Harvesting plan to include the values for "catchment area provided". Columns 5-9 currently show "0" for this row, even though a catchment ratio is provided in the following row. Also, In most cases much of the permeable planted portion of the WHIA may be included in the calculation for catchment area. Revise as necessary. DS 10-03 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/27/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |