Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0098
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/27/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/06/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please indicate the location of existing fire hydrants on site plan. |
| 09/11/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Projects within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown (RND) Zone shall be reviewed in accordance with the Administrative Design Review Procedures; 23A-32. Applications for RND Zone shall be referred to the design review board (DRB) to be scheduled for consideration at the first available meeting for determination of preliminary findings and commendations. Include with re-submittal DRB review approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 2. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed 3. Additional comments may apply |
| 09/12/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/17/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0098 140 E. Broadway Blvd Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: 09/13/12 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Per review of the submitted plans , aerial photos and a visit to the proposed site, the buildings to the south and east appear to be part of the entire proposal. Therefore the plans must show how these three buildings will work as one site. The elimination of the existing parking spaces for the Julian Drew buildings must either be relocated or included in the RND Infill Incentive District Core review or a MDR review process for the entire 3 parcel site. It appears that with the additional square footage added by the proposed expansion that greater than 25% increase in GFA for the 3 parcels will require full code compliance for the entire 3 parcels. A tax parcel combination or a covenant regarding development and use of real property would be required to be supplied at the next submittal. Provide a development package submittal per DS 2-01 for all 3 parcels. Please contact Russlynn Wells at 837-4948 for further information regarding the development of this site. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0098.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 09/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the future location of the gas meter d. the location of the building connection to the public sewer e. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 09/17/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Insufficient data provided for an accessible review. 2. Show accessible routes in and out of the building 3. Show parking layout and accessible parking to be provided. 4. Further comments to follow with detail information provided. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/24/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Gene Goldstein DATE: September 25, 2012 6225 N. Cam. Primeria Alta, #136 Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: Julian Drew Bldg., 140 E. Broadway Blvd. Development Package, DP12-0098 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 13 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package and Drainage Statement The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. General Notes. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. D.S. 2-01.3.7. 6. List special exceptions, zoning variances, zoning and development standard modifications, overlay zones, and other reviews that are applicable to the project. a. List special exceptions, variances, and modifications such as Sec. 2.8.10.8, Modification of Development Regulations (MDR), Sec. 5.1.7, Board of Adjustment (BOA), Sec. 5.1.8, Design Review Board (DRB), Sec. 5.1.9, Historical Commission, Sec. 5.1.10, Historic District Advisory Board (HDAB), Sec. 5.3.4 and 5.3.5, a Design Development Option (DDO), 5.3.9 Special Exception Land Uses, Sec. 5.4.1 and General Legislative Procedures, and 5.4.3 Zoning Examiner Legislative Procedure (SE), or DS 1-01.0, Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR), by case number, in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval. b. List overlay zones that are applicable to the property, such as Sec. 2.8.1, Hillside Development Zone (HDZ); Sec. 2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ); Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ); Sec. 2.8.6, Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ); Sec. 2.8.7, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; Sec. 2.8.8, Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ), 2.8.9 Drachman School Overlay (DSO), or 2.8.10 Rio Nuevo And Downtown (RND) of the LUC; or Sec. 29-12 through 29-19 Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) Ordinance of the Tucson Code, by case number, in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note state that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria, and provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. If there is more than one (1) lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the overlay zones. Projects involving Historic Preservation Zones, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zones (involving demolition), or overlay zones, require separate review and approval. c. If the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Development Standard 9-06.0., specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area. 3. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-01.3.8. C. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. E. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). G. Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled "to be removed" or "to be retained." 4. Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. D.S. 2-01.3.9. H. Proposed traffic circulation: 2. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 5. If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. c. Show all loading zones, and vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, and the design vehicle. J. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) N. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared inaccordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or onsite runoff discharge points. O. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. T. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/140 E. Broadway Blvd. DEVPKG-SITE |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/18/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |