Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0090
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/13/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
06/13/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
06/15/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET C2.1 1. At the accessible parking layout: a. Provide the parking space width dimension b. Grade slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 303.3; max 2% slope in all directiions. 2. Grade slopes for the marked crossing are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% max on running slopes and 2% max on cross slopes.. 3. At the ramp to the Vacant Space: a. The elevation difference from the middle landing to the top landing is 3.09'. The 18' length of the ramp at a 1:12 slope will hardly be long enough for this 3.09' rise. 4. Note 14 refers to a sidewalk detail 3/C3.1. Detail 3/C3.1 is a concrete wheel stop detail. 5. For all new accessible route slopes, ditto comment 2. 6. If the rear door of the Bakery is a required exit, the service gate is to comply with the IBC, Section 1108.1.9, Panic Hardware. 7. Please provide handrails on both side of the bakery ramp. SHEET C3.1 8. Detail 9, please include a "Van Accessible" sign. 9. Detail 7, please show actual calculated riser and tread dimensions complying with the 2006 IBC, Section 1009.3. END OF REVIEW |
06/20/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0090 4821 E. Grant Rd. Development TRANSMITTAL DATE: 06/22/12 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-01.2.6 A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 2. DS 2-01.3.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site and the developer of the project shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. 3. DS 2-01.3.2. The title block shall include the following information. B. A brief legal description is to be provided. 4. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0090. Place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets. 5. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 List the Use in general note #2 on sheet 2 of 10 as existing - Food Service "30", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C and Sec. 3.5.13.5 6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b List as a general note that this project meets the criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) 7. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.a Clearly indicate on the footprint of the building on the site plan the area of expansion. 8. DS 2-01.3.7.H.5.a The vehicle parking spaces located on the north side of the trash enclosure will be required to be a minimum of ten (10) feet in width. See LUC Sec. 3.3.6.4.B.2 A motor vehicle off-street parking space shall have a minimum width of ten (10) feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height. 9. DS 2-01.3.9.R Per DS 2-08.3.1 a pedestrian circulation path (sidewalk) is required to connect all buildings (Bakery and Vacant space) and all dumpster areas. Clearly indicate the minimum width (4') of all pedestrian circulations paths. Missing for the handicap ramps in front of the vacant space. Indicate the width at the top of the ramp. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0090.doc |
06/21/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter d. the location and size of the private sanitary sewer collection system e. the location of the building connection to the private sewer f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
06/22/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 25, 2012 SUBJECT: Paradise Bakery Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Architectural Design Group Inc; Attn: David Garcia, RA LOCATION: 6550 S Midvale Rd; T15S R13E Sec15; Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0090 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Provide a Drainage Statement for the property. Verify that removal of the landscape areas do not conflict with the master drainage report for the entire development due to it being located within a Balance Basin of Swan Road Wash. The Drainage Statement must verify that the proposed development meets the original intent of the Master Drainage Report. SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval. 2) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.1: Revise the development plan document to include the name, mailing and email addresses and phone numbers of the primary property owner and the site developer under the Project Directory Section on Sheet T1.1. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.B: Revise the title block on the development plan document to include a brief legal description of the site. 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0090) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.4: Revise the development plan document to provide the project-location map in the upper right corner of the Sheet T1.1 per DS Sec.2-01.2.6. 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.H.5: Revise the development plan document to provide for the required 10-foot parking space dimensions for the stalls adjacent to the proposed refuse enclosures. Per LUC Sec.3.3.6.4.B.2 "A motor vehicle off-street parking space shall have a minimum width of ten (10) feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height." 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.H.5: Revise the development plan document to clearly Keynote (#24) the vertical curbing that separates the handicap space pedestrian access area from the existing 24-foot PAAL. Verify the separation with a keynote and label the dimensions of the stripped area in plan view. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to clarify how pedestrian circulation from the proposed building connects to all other areas of development (including the future vacant space area) and to the proposed refuse enclosures per DS Sec.2-08.3.1. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and detail for the refuse enclosure to provide all aspect for construction purposes. The detail must match DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, etc. Any deviation from the Development Standard and Figure 3a will require prior approval from Environmental Services along with a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) application and approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
06/26/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | exception. |
06/26/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a revised landscape plan. C9-79-63, DS 2-07.2.1.A 2) Revise the landscape buffer note on Sheet C1.1 to reflect the required border on Grant Rd. 3) Grant Rd. should not be referenced as a Gateway Route on sheet C1.1. LUC 2.8.4 |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
07/16/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |