Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0089
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 01/02/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Resubmttal is required. A disk will be required due to review by ESD |
| 01/02/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 01/02/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Junction At Iron Horse Development Package (3rd Review) DP12-0089 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 2, 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This development package was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for the entire site. 2. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 10, 2013 3. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 4. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The existing easements shown to be "ABANDONED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT" will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. 5. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E As this project comprises numerous parcels, once the alley is abandoned, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Due to the changes to the plan the individual parking plan (IPP) will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this development package. Once approved the vehicle parking requirements can be reviewed. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L Provide the sequence number for all proposed easements. These easements will need to recorded prior to approval of the development package. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Based on the information provided under the "SITE DATE 3. REQUIRED/PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS" the following Modification of Development Regulations (MDR) or Board of Adjustment for Variance is required: a. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and Table 3.2.6-I, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000, the required North street perimeter yard setback is based on the height of the proposed building wall, measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. Based on a wall height of 65'-0", the required perimeter yard setback is 65'-0", the proposed street perimeter yard setback is 40'-0". b. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and Table 3.2.6-I, ADT of 140 or less, the required South street perimeter yard setback is based on the ½ the height of the proposed building wall, measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location. Based on a wall height of 68'-0", the required perimeter yard setback is 34'-0", the proposed street perimeter yard setback is 23'-9". c. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4, Development Designator 33, Perimeter Yard Indicator "DD", the required perimeter yard setback to adjacent R-3 zoned parcels is 1 ½ times the height of the building exterior wall. Based on a wall height of 68'-0" the required East perimeter yard setback to the adjacent R-3 zoned parcel is 102'-0", proposed perimeter yard setback to the adjacent R-3 zoned parcels is 79'-7". 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Per LUC Section 3.2.3.2.B, Development Designator 33, the allowed building height is 50'-0", proposed building height is 60'-0". A Modification of Development Regulations (MDR) or Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. 10. The MDR or Board of Adjustment must be approved prior to approval of the development package. If approved provide the number, date of approval, what was approved, and any conditions of approval on the development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0089 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, approved Pima County Combo Request form. |
| 01/02/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Junction At Iron Horse Development Package MDR review only DP12-0089 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 9, 2013 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This development package was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for the entire site. the following comments have been provided for MDR review only. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Based on the information provided under the "SITE DATE #3. REQUIRED/PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS" the following Modification of Development Regulations (MDR) or Board of Adjustment for Variance is required: a. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and Table 3.2.6-I, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000, the required North street perimeter yard setback is based on the height of the proposed building wall, measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. Based on a wall height of 55'-3", the required perimeter yard setback is 55'-3", the proposed street perimeter yard setback is 40'-0". b. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and Table 3.2.6-I, ADT of 140 or less, the required South street perimeter yard setback is based on the ½ the height of the proposed building wall, measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location. Based on a wall height of 48'-11", the required perimeter yard setback is 24'-6", the proposed street perimeter yard setback is 23'-9". c. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4, Development Designator 33, Perimeter Yard Indicator "DD", the required perimeter yard setback to adjacent R-3 zoned parcels is 1 ½ times the height of the building exterior wall. Based on a wall height of 53'-2" the required East perimeter yard setback to the adjacent R-3 zoned parcel is 79'-9", proposed perimeter yard setback to the adjacent R-3 zoned parcels is 75'-7". 3. The MDR or Board of Adjustment must be approved prior to approval of the development package. If approved provide the MDR number, date of approval, what was approved, and any conditions of approval on the development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0089 |
| 12/26/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 01/02/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/02/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |