Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0089
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/26/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/27/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | The project plans are not approved. Need DSMR to address 9 APC's listed in plans. In addition, plans need to detail how APC's will be serviced and brought to curb. General note that on site mgmt will address refuse on site does not cover APC's. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 11/28/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Junction At Iron Horse Development Package (3rd Review) DP12-0089 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 30, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This development package was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for the entire site. 2. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 10, 2013 3. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 4. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The existing easements shown to be "ABANDONED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT" will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. 5. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E As this project comprises numerous parcels, once the alley is abandoned, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Due to the changes to the plan the individual parking plan (IPP) will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this development package. Once approved the vehicle parking requirements can be reviewed. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Due to the changes to the plan the individual parking plan (IPP) will need to be submitted and approved prior to approval of this development package. Once approved the bicycle parking requirements can be reviewed. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L Provide the sequence number for all proposed easements. These easements will need to recorded prior to approval of the development package. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Provide building elevations so that all building perimeter yard setback requirements can be verified. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Based on the information provided under the "SITE DATE 3. REQUIRED/PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS" the following Modification of Development Regulations (MDR) or Board of Adjustment for Variance is required: a. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and Table 3.2.6-I, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000, the required North street perimeter yard setback is based on the height of the proposed building wall, measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. Based on a wall height of 58'-8", the required perimeter yard setback is 58'-8", the proposed street perimeter yard setback is 40'-0". b. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and Table 3.2.6-I, ADT of 140 or less, the required South street perimeter yard setback is based on the ½ the height of the proposed building wall, measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location. Based on a wall height of 55'-2", the required perimeter yard setback is 27'-7", the proposed street perimeter yard setback is 23'-9". c. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4, Development Designator 33, Perimeter Yard Indicator "DD", the required perimeter yard setback to adjacent R-3 zoned parcels is 1 ½ times the height of the building exterior wall. Based on a wall height of 58'-8" the required East perimeter yard setback to the adjacent R-3 zoned parcels is 88'-0", proposed perimeter yard setback to the adjacent R-3 zoned parcels is 79'-6". As building elevations were not provided with this submittal the required perimeter yard setbacks could not be verified. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The required West perimeter yard setback does not appear to be shown correctly. Based on an ADT of >140 the required setback should be 29'-4". 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Per LUC Section 3.2.3.2.B, Development Designator 33, the allowed building height is 50'-0", proposed building height is 55'-2". A Modification of Development Regulations (MDR) or Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. As building elevations were not provided with this submittal the required perimeter yard setbacks could not be verified. 13. The MDR or Board of Adjustment must be approved prior to approval of the development package. If approved provide the number, date of approval, what was approved, and any conditions of approval on the development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0089 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, approved Pima County Combo Request form. |
| 12/04/2012 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 December 4, 2012 To: JOHN GRENIER M. P.E. GRENIER ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: THE JUNCTION AT IRON HORSE Development Plan - 3rd submittal DP12-0089 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan. |
| 12/05/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. No issues with the Landscape plan submitted. 2. Prior to landscape approval signature include with re-submittal MDR or DRB approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 3. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed 4. Additional comments may apply |
| 12/07/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/07/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/10/2012 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Review completed. Revisions required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/26/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/26/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |