Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0089
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/12/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/13/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/14/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Junction At Iron Horse Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0089 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 14, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This development package was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for the entire site. 2. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 10, 2013 The following comments are based on the "LAYOUT TO BE USED WITH A DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SUBMITTAL (DS 2-01) dated 12-2009. This layout document can be viewed @ http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/DevPackageSubmittalLayout.pdf; 3. The sheet order is not correct. All general notes are to be on the cover sheet or a sheet following the cover sheet, organized under a heading indicating which plan the note(s) are for, i.e. site, grading, etc. The development plan/site plan should follow the demolition/existing conditions plan. The Native Plant Preservation plan should follow the Irrigation plan. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 4. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP12-0089 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.a List the IPP #T12SA00091 in the lower right corner, adjacent to the title block, on all sheets. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.a As a general note provide the IPP case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval on the plan. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a As a general note provide the floor area for each building. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Until the floor area for each building is provided the Floor Area Ratio cannot be verified. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The existing easements shown to be "ABANDONED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT" will need to be abandoned prior to approval of the development package. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E As this project comprises numerous parcels, once the alley is abandoned, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Until the parking angle is provided for the angled parking shown along the south side of the parking is provided the parking area access lane (PAAL) width requirement cannot be verified. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L Sheet 2 Keynotes 4 & 41 reference "DOCKET______, PAGE______". This should be "SEQUENCE NUMBER__________". These easements will need to recorded prior to approval of the development package. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Per LUC 3.2.6.3 Measurement. The width of the perimeter yard is the distance measured horizontally from a specified point to the face of each exterior building wall at the walls highest point. That said on sheet 1, the "REFERENCE SITE PLAN" shows "4TH FLOOR PARAPET HEIGHT 46'-4". Under 'SITE DATE, 3." the "4-STORY HT = 45'-0". Clarify which wall height is correct. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Provide building elevations so that all setbacks can be verified. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Provide the height of the proposed "NEW PIPING ENCLOSURE" so that setback requirements can be verified. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s) on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0089 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, approved Pima County Combo Request form. |
| 06/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 2 OF 16 1. The pedestrian route to the dumpster area does not have to be accessible. SHEET 5 OF 16 2. Please provide large scale details for all sidewalk ramps and stairs as per notes 18 and 21. Include dimensions, handrails, risers, treads slopes and elevation grades. a. Please provide elevations of all types of handrails. 3. Insure the slopes of all accessible routes comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% max running and 2% max cross slopes. 4. For all open stairs, please provide reduced vertical clearance as required by ICC A117.1, Section 307.4. SHEET 6 OF 16 5. Ditto comment 2 above SHEET 7 OF 16 6. At detail 7: For all curb ramps within the property boundaries, please comply with ICC A117.1, Section 406. a. For all flared sides of the ramps a 1:10 slope max must be provided b. Detectable warnings are only required when the ramp is part of a marked crossing only. 7. At detail 8, ditto comment 6b. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/15/2012 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#251059 June 14, 2012 Grenier Engineering Inc Attn: John Grenier 5524 E 4th St Tucson, Arizona 85711 Dear Mr. Grenier: SUBJECT: The Junction at Iron House DP12-0089 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 12, 2012. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. " Overhead facilities run through the site (Alley) Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 06/18/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/19/2012 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Denied | Plant materials look O.K. but not able to read all the notes. Please have them add my standard notes for planting in the ROW if they are not already on there. Thanks. Gary City of Tucson Department of Transportation Standard Notes for Planting in ROW 1. It is the owners responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section 2. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. 3. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. 4. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities. 5. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter) 6. Contractor to obtain a Right Of Way excavation permit prior to construction within the right-of-way. |
| 06/20/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | June 22, 2012 DP12-0089 T12OT00865 The Development Package and Floodplain Use Permit are not approved at this time. Please address the following and provide a response letter detailing how each has been addressed. 1. Revise the sheet order and notes to conform to the Development Package Development Standard requirements. 2. Revise note 27 on Sheet 1 to reflect that the project is within a special flood hazard area, FEMA zone AE. The SFHA zone is effective until changed by FEMA with a Letter of Map Revision. 3. Show sight visibility triangles for the street intersections adjacent to the project. Show dimensions for the parking areas in the street as well. 4. Clarify the status of the "Public Right of Way Easement" shown on the plan. The current assessor's map and the current GIS map indicate the area is Bean Avenue. If the Right of Way has been or will be abandoned, clearly indicate the details on the plan and explain in your response letter. 5. Show on the site or grading plans the maneuverability for the solid waste enclosures.(DS 6-01.5.3.B) 6. The floodplain use permit will be approved when the DP is approved. Loren Makus Loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/20/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (Sewer keynote S1, 2389.79') is less than 12" lower than the first floor elevation of the northeast building (2391.00'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 06/25/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary. LUC 3.7.3 & DS 2-06.3.7. Revise the landscape plan to show and identify the required screening along the east side of the site. 2) Identify the location for storage of the APC's mentioned on Sheet 1, Site Data notes 6. 3) Complete Project Note 1 on sheet 12. 4) Revise the NPP Plan to include provisions for preservation fencing Fencing is required during construction for individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. The area to be fenced shall be beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.0, DS -06 Figure 1. 5) The proposed enclosure for the booster pump and backflow preventor is located in the required street landscape border along 10th Street. Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border. LUC 3.7.3. This enclosure exceeds the maximum allowed encroachment. 6) Revise the landscape plan to include square footage of all street landscape borders and the calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage. DS 2-07. 7) Dimension the width of landscape borders on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. Provide additional dimension for any ROW areas used. 8) Revise the parking lot tree calculation on Sht. 13. to: correspond with the site plan calc., to then exclude any structurally covered or underground motor vehicle parking spaces, to count only trees located within ten feet* of the vehicular use area, and to meet or exceed the minimum number of trees required. *Vehicular Use Area. Any area of a site or structure used for the parking, storage, or standing of motor vehicles. The vehicular use area includes access drives, maneuvering areas, refuse collection locations, loading spaces, and any landscaping and screening within ten (10) feet of these areas. (Ord. No. 10016, §2, 8/2/04) (Ord. No. 10886, §21, 03/22/11) 9) In areas where a required landscape border falls within the vehicular use area, up to 50% of the canopy trees may be counted towards both the minimum parking lot canopy tree requirement and the landscape border canopy tree requirement. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.B 10) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. Add the required standard ROW notes to the plans as necessary. |
| 06/28/2012 | JWILLIA4 | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 June 27, 2012 To: JOHN GRENIER M. P.E. GRENIER ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: THE JUNCTION AT IRON HORSE Development Plan - 1st submittal DP12-0089 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Ref. A 2. Sheet 1: Include the following Permitting Note (Ref. A): A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 3. Sheet 9: Call out the proposed manhole on site as public. Ref. A 4. Sheet 9: Demonstrate accessibility to the proposed public manhole on site per WWM Std. Dtl 111. Ref. F 5. Sheet 9: Show the existing 6" public sewer line on site and call out the construction plan #. Call out the manhole with rim and invert elevations. Ref. A 6. Sheet 9: Call out the portion of public sewer to be abandoned and contact Mr. Steve Reuter w/PCRWRD @ 740-6608 to begin the process of abandonment. Ref. A 7. Sheet 9: Show the existing 24" public sewer line continuing west of MH #9908-20. Ref. A This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements - Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 06/29/2012 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 29, 2012 Michael Schooler GDA Southwest LLC 250 S. Craycroft Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: DP12-0089 THE JUNCTION AT IRON HORSE Development Package Dear Michael: Your submittal for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 3 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE ROLLED 3 Rolled Copies of the Revised Development Package (PDSD, Wastewater) 2 Copies of the Pima County Combo Request Documents (PDSD) 2 Copies of Building Elevations (PDSD) 1 CD of all documents and plans above. (PDSD) 1 Check made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |